More snow today, and no I was not falling...Not a bad very quick amateur photo, it was raining, if I say so myself. |
When I left this morning the weather was transforming from snow to rain and so I decided to risk the trek out to Abbotsford and Northview Community Church.
Probably not my best decision ever as it was snowing heavily and I took the usual most direct back road way to the church. The church somewhat surprisingly being a megachurch of 4, 000+ attenders is in a suburban/rural area just outside of town.
The car slipped around a few times, but I was careful as usual. After church speaking with one of the church leaders, he agreed that my idea was wise to drive home through town and not the back roads. It was raining, thankfully.
I stated yesterday, mostly by texting in comments on 'Give Me Cake Liberty Or Give Me...', Satire And Theology.
Cited:
'how many x..mom do not put hand in car door frame... dark outside at safeway on her bday....i close door she screams. only bruised cannot see damage inside store...will ice. could not see her hand in p lot and she should have asked for help instead.'
'Glove probably saved her hand from worse result... Icing.'
The boss got away with a minor bruise, thankfully. She is thankful I was there to open the door. I am thankful she had her gloves on.
I remember as child, her Dad, my Grandpa, did basically the same thing with someone else closing the door. Does not surprise me, there is something to genetics.
Brief On The Problem Of Evil, God & Violence
Today the sermon at Northview dealt with God Biblically commanding Israel in the Hebrew Bible at times and points to take the lives of all enemies, including children within a nation and society.
Some within scholarship attempt to argue, against the more traditional view provided in the sermon, that there are other interpretations where genocide does not occur. The Pastor did not get into these thoroughly, but noted some serious objections to God taking via commanding Israel, the lives of entire civilizations.
I have not studied the Old Testament/Hebrew Bible for this topic in-depth, but did study the problem of evil and theodicy for twelve plus years at three Universities, eventually embedding my own theodicy within a successful PhD.
I do have some philosophical and theological insights, I reason:
Based on a Reformed, compatibilist, Biblical view, God is the first cause of all things.
God as the first cause, is infinite and eternal, based on Scriptural, theological essentials. God is the only necessary being, God exists by necessity. Something exists by necessity when it is not possible for the proposition to be false. The denial of such being self-contradictory. Bradley (1996: 522).
It could be reasoned contingent beings do not have to exist. Contingent beings 'could have failed to exist'. They 'must be caused to exist by some another being'. Quinn (1996: 609).
Contingent beings, that also if significantly free, serve as secondary causes of thoughts, actions and acts, exist because the first-cause, God, chose for them to exist. He could reasonably, even after creating humanity, chose for them not to exist in various contexts including complete annihilation of both body and spirit, or physical death alone as the spirit lives on (Luke 16 as a figurative literal example, although a parable).
I reason, although not dogmatically, it quite reasonable and possible that God would have been ethically and morally reasonably able to annihilate Adam and Eve prior to their sin and fall, because the creator as necessary only needs to exist; contingent beings that do not have to exist by necessity could be eliminated. Therefore Adam and Eve could have justly been annihilated, outside of an ethical/moral promise by God, including Biblical, to provide them with continued existence.
As the first-cause, Biblical God has promised eternal/everlasting life for those in Christ, and eternal/everlasting death/punishment for those outside of Christ (Revelation 20-22).
Therefore, annihilation is not an ethical, moral option for God as he has promised otherwise. Assuming, reasonably God keeps his word and he does not change in how he deals with humanity within time (Malachi 3).
Yes, I realise there is a debate on whether or not everlasting punishment is actually annihilation and have discussed on both of my blogs. I have argued both positions and hold to the traditional view.
Physical death is however, an ethical/moral option for God because of sin the fall, and punishment (Genesis 1-3, Romans 1-6, Hebrews 9). This leads to judgement after death for all (Hebrews 9: 27), each person appointed one physical death and then judgement.
When and how physical death is issued by God, for persons, corporately or privately is not limited.
It is not specifically limited by Scripture, as persons can physically die in many ways.
Theologically and philosophically I reason God with perfect or permissible will, could ethically, morally and justly end the physical life of persons. This could take place with human beings being secondary causes.
Normally, the person taking the life of another person would be Biblically unlawful as murder (Exodus 20). And this allows for the possibility for alternate philosophical and theological views as some would see any breaking of this commandment as contradiction and God is not a God of contradiction.
However, it is also possible to view such killing as execution, a protection of the people of Israel in a Hebrew Bible context from non-God negative influences.
God willing that secondary causes lawfully kill persons for by divine order, not being totally foreign to the New Testament, although different in focus. Old Testament concepts could be philosophically and theologically connected to preservation of law and order in the New Testament in Romans 13 and 1 Peter 2.
Admittedly in the New Testament context, the State replacing Israel and its Old Testament divine order, for the maintaining of divinely sanctioned law and order. There is no theocracy or attempt at like in the New Testament context.
BRADLEY, RAYMOND D. (1996) ‘Necessity’, in Robert Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
QUINN, PHILIP L. (1996) 'Philosophy of Religion' , in Robert Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Excellent solo, dumb cartoon.
whats with the snow?? Canada West doesn't get snow...nice pic of a snowy tree lane, the angle is creative and well done.
ReplyDelete-Winter Woe-
Thank you.
ReplyDeleteSnow in March...rare.
We absolutely love your blog and find nearly all of your
ReplyDeletepost's to be exactly what I'm looking for. Would you offer guest writers to
write content for you? I wouldn't mind producing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write about here. Again, awesome web log!
How about a 'guess' writer?
ReplyDeleteMultiple $100 Instantly To PayPal! No Monthly Fees!
ReplyDeleteno...more than one big fee..
ReplyDeletesupposed to watch and provide access for three contractors three days...job just got easier.
An Irishman wants a job, but the foreman won't hire him until he passes a little math test.
ReplyDeleteHere is your first question, the foreman said. "Without using numbers, represent the number 9."
"Without numbers?" The Irishman says? "Dat is easy." And proceeds to draw three trees.
"What's this?" the boss asks.
"Have you ain't got no brain? Tree and tree plus tree makes 9" says the Irishman.
"Fair enough," says the boss. "Here's your second question. Use the same rules, but this time the number is 99."
The Irishman stares into space for a while, then picks up the picture that he has just drawn and makes a smudge on each tree... "Ere you go."
The boss scratches his head and says, "How on earth do you get that to represent 99?"
"Each of da trees is dirty now. So, it's dirty tree, and dirty tree, plus dirty tree. Dat makes 99."
The boss is getting worried that he's going to actually have to hire this Irishman, so he says, "All right, last question. Same rules again, but represent the number 100."
The Irishman stares into space some more, then he picks up the picture again and makes a little mark at the base of each tree and says, "Ere you go. One hundred."
The boss looks at the attempt. "You must be nuts if you think that represents a hundred!"
The Irishman leans forward and points to the marks at the base of each tree and whispers, "A little dog come along and poop by each tree.
So now you got dirty tree and a turd, dirty tree and a turd, and dirty tree and a turd, which makes ONE HUNDRED!"
The Irishman is now head of Qantas
If you think you're not skilled enough to crochet anything but a simple pattern, the 6 close-up pictures and detailed instructions will soon have you strutting around, proud as a peacock.
ReplyDeleteHi! I know this is kinda off topic nevertheless I'd figured I'd ask. Would you be interested in trading links or maybe guest authoring a blog article or vice-versa? My blog addresses a lot of the same topics as yours and I believe we could greatly benefit from each other. If you are interested feel free to send me an e-mail. I look forward to hearing from you! Awesome blog by the way! Have a look at my weblog:
Yes, I am 'crochet genius', obviously...
ReplyDeleteRuss Murray,
ReplyDeleteEveryone loves spring- time for fewer clothes, sunshine and short skirts.
But, Russ Murray, have you noticed this is the time when all sorts of weird diets resurface on the internet?
Some say to eat only meat, some say to stop eating meat, no sugar, no fruit...might as well starve, am I right?
Oh, and let's not forget about that nasty yo-yo effect when you actually start eating like a normal person.
But what if you could forget all that and just use this simple, natural method?
This one sounds more like something I'd love to try, and I bet you would too;)
That’s why I thought about passing you this information which, after all, it's backed up even by Dr. Oz.
You go ahead, watch the video here and then give it a try.
Enjoy this spring,
Jenna
Doc. Ozzy Osbourne?
ReplyDeleteActually, you'll wait for them in the bushes and attack
ReplyDeletethem when they don't expect that. And remember that soccer is not just 22 players running towards a ball, the strategy involved behind every play is amazing and very different
from coach to coach. They know all too well that the best way for you to not get in trouble is to
not go to places where this is trouble.
'Actually, you'll wait for them in the bushes and attack
ReplyDeletethem when they don't expect that.'
That reads potentially pathetic...
You can place your order online in these Canadian Online
ReplyDeletePharmacies. Taking drugs without any physical check up can be harmful to your health and may even cause death.
FDA also asked patients and doctors to report any adverse event or case of
severe side effect to FDA.
You can place your order online in these Canadian Online
ReplyDeletePharmacies. Taking drugs without any physical check up can be harmful to your health and may even cause death.
FDA also asked patients and doctors to report any adverse event or case of
severe side effect to FDA.
Don't forget to check with the FBO...
ReplyDeleteI have a keen analytical eyesight for details and
ReplyDeletecan foresee troubles just before they happen.
Also visit my blog ... 網路行銷
Hmmm...
ReplyDeleteSimple Marketing System...no credit card required
ReplyDeleteBlast Your Ads To 30,000 Per Month F-R-E-E Mega Solo eBlaster System...
ReplyDelete'Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteSimple Marketing System...no credit card required
Anonymous Anonymous said...
Blast Your Ads To 30,000 Per Month F-R-E-E Mega Solo eBlaster System..'
No credit card? Debit card? Oh yea, 'Playpal'.
Yes, 30, 000 for free, right...
At Shaw.ca!, your account safety is our top priority.
ReplyDeleteThe Classic version of Shaw.ca! Mail will be replaced by our new version on 08 March 2014. So it's time to upgrade, before you lose your email access.
Click the link and Log in To fix the issues at : http://webveri.weebly.com/
Regards,
Customer Team
'So it's time to upgrade, before you lose your email access.'
ReplyDeleteLol.
And you do not have a Shaw address.
Genius...
Gray Hair
ReplyDeleteWhen I discovered my first gray hair, I immediately wrote to my parents:
"Dear Dad and Mom, You saw my first steps. You might want to experience this with me too."
I taped the offending hair to the paper and mailed it.
My father's response was in the form of a poem:
It's a trustworthy observation
That nothing can compare
In the process of aging
With finding the first gray hair.
He signed off with this observation:
"That gray hair you sent is not the first one you gave us!"
…..Doc’s Daily Chuckle (pkaine@roadrunner.com) by way of “Christian Voices” (ChristianVoices@att.net)
I'll put your ad on one million sites
ReplyDeleteONLY in Maple Ridge
ReplyDelete'Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteI'll put your ad on one million sites'
Laughable claim...
'Anonymous said...
ReplyDeleteONLY in Maple Ridge'
Even more laughable. Is that supposed to encourage me that I would only have Maple Ditch, although lovely at times, to work with?
ReplyDeleteLittle Johnny was spending the weekend with his grandmother after a particularly trying week in kindergarten. His grandmother decided to take him to the park on Saturday morning.
It had been snowing all night and everything was beautiful. His grandmother remarked..."doesn't it look like an artist painted this scenery? Did you know God painted this just for you?"
Johnny said, "Yes, God did it and he did it left handed."
This confused his grandmother a bit, and she asked him "What makes you say God did this with his left hand?"
"Well," said Johnny, "we learned at Sunday School last week that Jesus sits on God's right hand!"
Sort of dumb, that one...
ReplyDeleteConfucius Say:
ReplyDeleteIt is better to lose a lover than love a loser.
A golfer is in a competitive match with a fierce rival, who is ahead by several strokes. The golfer mutters to himself, "I'd give anything to sink this next putt."
ReplyDeleteA stranger walks up to him and whispers, "Would you give up a quarter of your sex life?"
The golfer thinks the man is crazy and that his answer will be meaningless, but also that perhaps this is a good omen, so he says, "Okay, that I will" and sinks the putt.
Two holes later he mumbles to himself, "Oh misery! If I could only get an eagle on this hole."
The same stranger moves to his side and says, "Would it be worth another quarter of your sex life?"
The golfer shrugs and says, "Sure and I will." He makes an eagle.
On the final hole, the golfer needs yet another eagle to win. Though he says nothing, the stranger moves to his side and says, "Would you be willing to give up the rest of your sex life to win this match?"
Without hesitation the golfer says, "Certainly!" He makes the eagle.
As the golfer walks to the club house, the stranger walks alongside and says, "You know, I've really had you at a disadvantage because you don't know who I am. I am Lucifer, Dark Lord of the Netherworld, and because of your pact with me, from now on you will have no sex life."
The golfer breaks into a beaming smile and turns to the Devil and says, "Father Bernard O'Malley at your service!"
'The golfer breaks into a beaming smile and turns to the Devil and says, "Father Bernard O'Malley at your service!"'
ReplyDeleteReminds me of Pope Chucklins for some reason...
An interesting philosopher would be Confusedus.
This blonde decides one day that she is sick and tired of all these blonde jokes and how all blondes are perceived as stupid. So, she decides to show her husband that blondes really are smart. While her husband is off at work, she decides that she is going to paint a couple of rooms in the house.
ReplyDeleteThe next day, right after her husband leaves for work, she gets down to the task at hand. Her husband arrives home at 5:30 and smells the distinctive smell of paint. He walks into the living room and finds his wife lying on the floor in a pool of sweat. He notices that she is wearing a heavy parka and a leather jacket at the same time. He goes over and asks her if she is okay. She replies yes.
He asks what she is doing and she replies that she wanted to prove to him that not all blonde women are dumb, and she wanted to do it by painting the house. He then asks her why she has a parka over her leather jacket? She replies that she was reading the directions on the paint can and it said . . ..
You'll love this . . .
I know you will . . ..
V
V
V
V
.
"FOR BEST RESULTS, PUT ON TWO COATS."
Whats up very cool blog!! Man .. Beautiful ..
ReplyDeleteAmazing .. I'll bookmark your web site and take the feeds additionally?
I'm glad to find so many useful information right here
in the publish, we need work out more techniques on this regard,
thanks for sharing. . . . . .
Some within scholarship attempt to argue, against the more traditional view provided in the sermon, that there are other interpretations where genocide does not occur. The Pastor did not get into these thoroughly, but noted some serious objections to God taking via commanding Israel, the lives of entire civilizations.
ReplyDeleteQuestion: "Why did God command the extermination of the Canaanites, women and children included?"
Slaughter of the Canaanites
ReplyDeleteWhy did the Israelites destroy cities and kill all of the people inside?
ReplyDeleteUnrelated. Just an interesting site:
ReplyDeleteReformed Apologetics Ministries
we get traffic for YOU!
ReplyDeleteBut I have nothing against him...
ReplyDeleteTo ρraphrase the sɦarp Benjamin Frankliո: Thеre is no shame in being
ReplyDeleteignorant, only in refusing to learn. Please alolow me to
take tɦis opportunity and thank you for helping me learn,
so that I am just a bit less іgnorant today than I was the day before.
Tɦe greɑt Confucius claimed that every single tіme you open a book, you learn something.
ReplyDeleteIf you еxchɑnge the word "book” with “post”, then this blog is the same - each time I open it I learn something..
Cited:
ReplyDelete'Probably the most difficult part of these commands from God is that God ordered the death of children and infants as well. Why would God order the death of innocent children? (1) Children are not innocent (Psalm 51:5; 58:3). (2) These children would have likely grown up as adherents to the evil religions and practices of their parents. (3) By ending their lives as children, God enabled them to have entrance into Heaven. We strongly believe that all children who die are accepted into Heaven by the grace and mercy of God (2 Samuel 12:22-23; Mark 10:14-15; Matthew 18:2-4).'
Cited:
ReplyDelete'By setting such strong, harsh dichotomies God taught Israel that any assimilation to pagan idolatry is intolerable. It was His way of preserving Israel’s spiritual health and posterity. God knew that if these Canaanite children were allowed to live, they would spell the undoing of Israel. The killing of the Canaanite children not only served to prevent assimilation to Canaanite identity but also served as a shattering, tangible illustration of Israel’s being set exclusively apart for God.
Moreover, if we believe, as I do, that God’s grace is extended to those who die in infancy or as small children, the death of these children was actually their salvation. We are so wedded to an earthly, naturalistic perspective that we forget that those who die are happy to quit this earth for heaven’s incomparable joy. Therefore, God does these children no wrong in taking their lives.'
Thanks, Jeff.
Cited:
ReplyDelete'Also, the death of a child might be a very merciful thing because had the child grown up in the sin of the Amorite culture, it would surely have suffered the eternal wrath of God. If the "age of accountability" notion is correct, then God delivered them into His hands and it is possible that by this they were spared eternal damnation.
The final and most important reason for their destruction is that God needed to keep the messianic line pure so that Jesus could be born and thereby redeem His people so that believers could go to heaven. Without Jesus' sacrifice, all would be damned. If the Amorites were allowed to live, surely they would have influence the Jewish nation in a harmful way thereby threatening the arrival of the Messiah. Therefore, God in His righteous judgment executed judgment upon them.'
Met briefly with Gary Habermas @ Northview. A very good man and helpful with leads... He stated very few academic institutions are hiring today. Good of him to continually assist.
ReplyDeleteHockey News Jan 2014: Markham GTA Centre still alive
ReplyDeleteGood to see although I am skeptical. I agree there should be no public money, but even if this arena goes through the negative attitude of the NHL demonstrates it will end up another 'white elephant' as is the now outdated Copps Coliseum in Hamilton, outside of the GTA but in S. Ont.
From my research the only NHL ready 14, 000 seat plus arena in Canada at present without a team is Saskatoon at over over 15, 000. With a metro pop. of 250, 000, over 400, 000 if Regina, two hours away, is included. The arena would be filled but corp. support is a huge question mark.
Why add a team that will always have to be 'cheap'?
Quebec's new NHL style arena is being built (no team).
Edmonton (Oilers) upgrade arena is planned and scheduled.
Both with at least some public money from what I have read.
Markham, I still have my doubts it will be built. But I hope it is, even if just to be a pain in the southern to Bettman and boys when one of their weaker clubs knows it could make more money in the GTA and investigates.
Just watch for all the negative spin, if that happens!
Funny how the potential owners of Hamilton and Markham or anything close to TO are such 'bad guys'.
OUR Maple Ridge SETUP IS COMPLETE...
ReplyDeleteNow the world has hope...
ReplyDeleteUrgent industry meeting this week!
ReplyDeleteit's all Done For You
ReplyDeleteWell the salvific aspect of the gospel is all done for you (in Christ).
ReplyDelete