 |
| Bristol, England-Google+ |
God and Sovereignty
Peter Kreeft (1988) explains that the
problem of evil is the most serious problem in the world,[1] and
is a very serious objection to theism.[2]
Roman Catholics Peter Kreeft and Ronald
K. Tacelli (1994) suggest that God faces no real barriers in actions he wishes
to commit, and that only what God allows, such as human sin, could thwart God’s
plans.[3]
They note if God did not allow human
beings the option to misuse their freedom, they would not be human but animal
or machine[4] having less value than creatures that
had the potential to be persuaded by God to follow him, and turn from wrong
doing.[5]
Satan
Kreeft, working with Ronald K. Tacelli,
states Satan is a deceiver of humanity,[6] and this
implies the assumption that Satan has personality.[7]
In Regard to Calvinism
They note that some, but not all, forms
of Calvinism subscribe to a view of hard determinism that denies any human free
will.[8] I would reason that in light of their
statement[9] that most Calvinists are not hard
determinists.[10]
On Desires and Freewill
Kreeft and Tacelli approach desires in
a similar way as Mele as they state that human beings have innate desire for
natural things such as food and drink,[11] and
external desires such as sports cars and political office.[12]
Kreeft and Tacelli’s innate desires concept would somewhat correspond to Mele’s
intrinsic ones as these would be the inner most human desires.[13] Kreeft and Tacelli’s external desires would be
similar to Mele’s extrinsic desires,[14] which
would be secondary desires fulfilled in order to fulfill the deepest human
desires.[15]
Immanence and Transcendence
Kreeft and Tacelli explain that God’s
immanence means the creator must give created beings what they need.[16] If God was not actively communicating being[17] to all his creation, his creation would cease to
exist.[18]
It is stated that God as transcendent
is not part of the material universe.[19] God is
‘other’ than his creation yet maintains it as transcendent.[20]
Universalism
Kreeft and Tacelli explain that universalism
is universal salvation and has been considered by some well-known orthodox
Christians over the centuries[21] as a viable
alternative to hell, although Kreeft and Tacelli reject this alternative.[22]
KREEFT,
PETER (1988) Fundamentals of the Faith, San Francisco, Ignatius
Press.
KREEFT,
PETER AND RONALD K. TACELLI (1994) Handbook of Christian Apologetics,
Downers Grove, Illinois, InterVarsity Press.
MELE, ALFRED
R. (1996) ‘Extrinsic Desire’, in Robert Audi, (ed.), The Cambridge
Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
[1] Kreeft
(1988: 54-58).
[2] Kreeft
(1988: 54-58).
[3] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 96).
[4] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 138).
[5] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 138). This assumes incompatibilism but it is true that
human beings would be vastly different with significantly less freedom due to
divine determining factors.
[6] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 294).
[7] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 294).
[8] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 137).
[9] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 137).
[10] My
research demonstrates that hard determinism is problematic for the majority of
Calvinists and those within Reformed theology because Scripture (Romans 1-3,
for example) condemns persons for sin and holds them morally accountable.
Therefore, persons must at least freely embrace their own actions within soft
determinism in order for punishment to be just.
[11] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 78).
[12] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 78).
[13] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 78).
[14] Mele
(1996: 259).
[15] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 78).
[16] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 93-94).
[17] Kreeft
and Tacelli with the use of the word ‘being’ are stating that God, in an
abstract sense, is communicating himself to his creation.
[18] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 93-94).
[19] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 93).
[20] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 93).
[21] This
would, of course, provide another opportunity for a PhD thesis.
[22] Kreeft
and Tacelli (1994: 286).
---
CBS Denver
I heard this story on 'The
Briefing' at Albert Mohler.com
Cited
'Colorado Vets See Spike In Cases Of ‘Stoner Dogs’'
Cited
'The popularity of medical marijuana in Colorado has had an
unintended side effect — dogs getting stoned, sometimes with deadly results.
Some people firmly believe that if medical marijuana helps people, it also
helps their pets, but that’s not always the case.
Marijuana can be harmful and sometimes toxic for dogs. New
research shows that with medical marijuana, the number of dogs getting sick
from pot is spiking. “They basically have lost a lot of their fine motor
control, they have a wide-based stance and they are not sure on their feet,”
said Dr. Debbie Van Pelt of VRCC, the Veterinary Specialty and Emergency
Hospital in Englewood.'
Cited
'Most of the time veterinarians say dogs get the medical marijuana
by eating their owners food products that are laced with marijuana that were
left out in the open. More and more dispensaries sell those kinds of products.'
Cited '“We need people to realize it is potentially toxic and potentially fatal
to their pets,” Van Pelt said.'
The Colorado Stoner Dogs...
It reads and sounds like a potential new professional sports team
for the State...
I do feel bad in regard to the suffering dogs.
I am not interested in marijuana for recreational use, or the use
of any substance that is significantly mind altering.
Therefore I would only consume alcohol and as well over-the
counter and prescription medication, where applicable, in moderation.
For those that use medical marijuana the common sense approach
would be to keep these products stored in a private place as would be
potentially lethal over-the counter or prescription drugs.
