Thursday, March 31, 2022

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part II

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part II

THE ORTHODOX STUDY BIBLE, NEW TESTAMENT AND PSALMS (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Nashville, Tennessee, Thomas Nelson Publishers

The review of this fine, academic source, continues.

Brief Review of The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part I

Glossary from Reverend John Morris, PhD

Quote

'A statement of belief. Creeds in their earlier form were used by the apostles, and many are recorded in the New Testament (Eph. 5: 14; 1 Tim. 3: 16; 2 Tim. 2:11-13). The creed used throughout the Church was adopted at the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and expanded at the Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381. The Nicene Creed is used at baptisms, the Divine Liturgy, and in personal prayers.' (796).

Wikipedia: Liturgy 

λειτουργία/leitourgia 


'Liturgy (leitourgia) is a Greek composite word meaning originally a public duty, a service to the state undertaken by a citizen. Its elements are leitos (from leos = laos, people) meaning public, and ergo (obsolete in the present stem, used in future erxo, etc.), to do. From this we have leitourgos, "a man who performs a public duty", "a public servant", often used as equivalent to the Roman lictor; then leitourgeo, "to do such a duty", leitourgema, its performance, and leitourgia, the public duty itself.'


Smartfaith.net

Cited 

'Kevin Simington (B.Th. Dip. Min.) is a theologian, apologist and social commentator.' 

Cited 

'Contrary to some people’s misguided views, liturgy was not a later ‘add-on’ instituted by a stultified church but was a vital part of Christian worship from the very beginning. The New Testament contains many references to the ongoing practice of liturgical worship as well as actual examples of first century liturgy.'

Comments

The smartfaith.net comments are in agreement with the Orthodox Study Bible, in as much that liturgy was practiced within the New Testament and the New Testament era. To use the first New Testament reference from the Orthodox text, quoting a saying in Ephesians 5: 14:

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

14 For this reason [a]it says, “Awake, sleeper, And arise from the dead, And Christ will shine on you.” 

Footnotes a) Ephesians 5:14 Or He

The Orthodoxy text uses the 

New King James Version (NKJV)

14 Therefore He says: “Awake, you who sleep, Arise from the dead, And Christ will give you light.”

The Orthodoxy text states that verse 14 is an early baptism hymn, and that baptism is illumination. (450).

From my Reformed and Anabaptist perspective, baptism is a key New Testament practice (ordinance or sacrament, depending on the denomination) that represents a sign of regeneration (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter 1: 23) for a believer. 

1 Peter 3: 21

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you—not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience—through the resurrection of Jesus Christ...
---

A good conscience exists via regeneration and the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ to a believer.

From this brief review in Part 1, we can see that a creed is a statement of belief; whereas liturgy is a form of public worship. So, a liturgy may be a creed and vice-versa.

Both are a biblical means of expressing theological truths. 

Selected source from cited links 

Fortescue, A. (1910). Liturgy, In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved March 20, 2022 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09306a.htm
---

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part II

One notable, historical key creed

C.A. Blaising explains that the Council of Nicea was the first ecumenical (many churches, my add) council in the history of the Christian Church. (774). This was convened by Roman Emperor, Constantine. (774). The Nicene Creed which resulted was the first to have the claim of universal theological authority throughout the Roman Empire (774). From Blaising, it was an 'almost unanimous production' (774) that was accepted for the universal Church.

From the Cairns text on page 24, is a Chronology of Church History, up to 1521 AD/CE. I could not find an image online and so I took a photo with my LG phone, below.

The first creed listed is the Nicene Creed from the Council of Nicea in 325 AD/CE. Paraphrasing the Pocket Dictionary, the Council of Nicea was convened by the Roman Empire, Constantine (83) in regards to Arianism (83), which denied the deity of Jesus Christ, based on the teachings of Arius (died 335-336) (15). 

George Newlands explains that Arius believed that Jesus Christ was the incarnate Logos, but was subject to change. (103). The Logos, itself, was therefore subject to change. (103). The Logos for Arius would not be eternal God. This is error in my view as the nature of God the Son, God the Word (Logos/Λόγος), is eternal, infinite and immutable (the Gospel of John, Chapter 1, clearly portrays the Word of God, as fully God). As Jesus Christ was fully human, his body would change, as would any other human being. But his divine nature, as the God the Word, Logos, would not. 

Does the resurrected body of Jesus Christ change? As now immortal, I doubt it. (Referencing the example of resurrected humanity in 1 Corinthians 15).

Arius reasoned that as God was immutable, my term paraphrasing (103), Jesus Christ could not be God. (103). Therefore he reasoned the Logos was not God. This is a misunderstanding of trinitarian theology and the biblical text by Arius and within Arianism. The same could be stated for denying the deity of Christ over the issue of impassibility (103). Jesus Christ as fully human, would suffer, but God in nature cannot suffer. God is impassible in my view, at least in that God's ontological nature cannot be changed by suffering. I do reason that God with infinite knowledge, does understand all suffering.


Blaising documents that Arianism argued that the Son cannot have the same exact essence as God the Father, because then 'the essence would be divisible'. (774). Arianism stated that the Son only does God the Father's will, as do all other creatures. (774). 

The Pocket Dictionary documents that the Nicene Creed teaches that God the Son is of one substance with God the Father (83) as in homoousios (83), ὁμοούσιος (my add). As spirit (John 4: 24) God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit, have one nature as three distinctions/persons. The Nicene Creed was revamped slightly at the Council of Constantinople in 381 AD/CE (83). 

V.L.Walter reasons that 'the most compelling argument against Arianism' (75), in agreement with Athanasius, is that only God incarnate, could reconcile and redeem fallen humanity to a holy God. (75).

I would state that God the Son, Jesus Christ, as infinite could outlast finite sin on the cross. A finite being, as in Arianism, could not do so. God the Son, Jesus Christ, as perfect human being, could serve as the divine sacrifice for sin and simultaneously conquer death.

Romans 6: 23 King James Version (KJV)

23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

The Nicene Creed, in my view, biblically protects the New Testament, Trinitarian theology of the deity of Jesus Christ. Yes, in the incarnation, God the Son, God the Word (John 1) took an additional human nature that does not mix with the infinite, eternal nature of God. God the Son, remains, fully God the Son, even as incarnate Jesus Christ.
---

ARIUS


Cited

'As with most heretics, Arius is known primarily through the eyes of his opponents; only a few letters of Arius himself survive. Modern studies of Arius and Arianism are scarce: Henry Melvill Gwatkin, Studies of Arianism: Chiefly Referring to the Character and Chronology of the Reaction Which Followed the Council of Nicaea (1882; 2d ed. 1900), and John Henry Newman, The Arians of the Fourth Century (1833; 4th rev. ed. 1876), are helpful but prejudiced and outdated. Of general surveys, G.L. Prestige, Fathers and Heretics (1940); Jean Daniélou and Henri Marrou, The Christian Centuries, vol. 1: The First Six Hundred Years (1963; trans. 1964); and Henry Chadwick, The Early Church (trans. 1967), can be consulted with profit.'

ATHANASIUS, SAINT, PATRIARCH OF ALEXANDRIA, (-373) (1970). St. Athanasius on the Incarnation : the Treatise De Incarnatione. Verbi Dei. London :A. R. Mowbray & Co.

BLAISING, C.A (1996) ‘Nicea Council of’ in Walter A. Elwell (ed.) Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.

CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House. 

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press. 

NEWLANDS, GEORGE (1999) 'Christology', in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Limited.

SHELBY, BRUCE L. (1982) Church History In Plain Language, Word Books, Waco, Texas. 

WALTER, V.L. (1996) ‘Arianism’ in Walter A. Elwell (ed.) Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.















Thursday, March 24, 2022

According to some scientists, the soul/spirit may not die

According to some scientists, the soul/spirit may not die

Photo: Beautiful World is with Bashir Rehman, March 21, 2022, Prague, Facebook

Preface

The first linked article was on my Facebook feed, yesterday.

Citations in italics, my comments in regular text. As I am not a scientist, my comments will more so be from a theological and philosophical, background and biblically based.

agoodone.me

(Appears to be a 2022) article on Facebook)

Cited 

According to scientists, the ‘soul’ does not die, it 'returns to the Universe

An initial thought. If the human soul or spirit could ever be significantly, scientifically, empirically, demonstrated, some aspects of metaphysics would then become, in a sense, physics. 

Referenced


Louis P. Pojman defines metaphysics as beyond physics. The study of ultimate reality, which is not accessible/available through empirical senses. He lists free will, causality, the nature of matter, immortality and the existence of God as being within the study of metaphysics. Pojman (1995: 598). 

Simon Blackburn explains the term was used for three books from Aristotle after 'Physics' and is a term that raises enquiry about questions that cannot be answered by science and its empirical methods. Blackburn (1996: 240).

Referenced


Louis P. Pojman explains that the term a priori comes from the Latin “preceding” and is knowledge that is not based on sense experience but is innate or known to human beings by the meanings of words and definitions. Pojman (1996: 595). Arthur Pap defines a priori knowledge as being independent of experience. Pap (1973: 666). 

Pojman writes that a posteriori comes the Latin “the later” and is knowledge that is obtained from human sense experience only, as in the five senses. Pojman (1996: 595). Blackburn reasons that something can be known a posteriori when it cannot be known a priori. Blackburn (1996: 21-22). 

If science and physics could significantly demonstrate the soul/spirit as within empirical knowledge, then philosophically, at least, aspects of metaphysics could be considered physical, empirical, a posteriori knowledge. 

I would, however, deduce that many aspects of the spiritual realm would still remain within metaphysics and therefore, based on the philosophy of religion, definition, at least, a priori knowledge. 

Within Biblical and Reformed traditions, we believe in God as spirit (John 4: 24) and angelic and demonic beings as spirit (s). This primarily based on scriptural revelation and a rational, reasonable faith and philosophy/theology. The academic disciplines of Biblical Studies and Theology may be connected to, as in my case, the use of Philosophy of Religion. Biblically, the theological content of the nature of the soul/spirit is non-empirical, but the human means of divine revelation, the Hebrew Bible writers and prophets, the New Testament writers and apostles, and Jesus Christ as God incarnate, were empirically experienced as religious history.

As a non-scientist and non-physicist, I have no firm opinion on any empirical, possibility of demonstrating the human soul/sprit. I am simply reviewing and responding to the article and some related links.


Cited 

People who are religious or spiritual typically believe in a paradise or an afterlife. Some people believe that nothing happens to us and that we simply die. Others, on the other hand, think that our souls continue to exist after we die. A couple of researchers claim to have the evidence to suggest that this is a possibility.

I realize that many scientists do not believe in the existence of a human soul/spirit.


Paraphrasing, philosopher and expert on the resurrection and near death experiences, Dr. Gary Habermas in several of the audio discussions I have heard:

If there is any reasonable evidence for the existence of the soul/spirit after death, then naturalism is dead.

Naturalism

Nature is viewed as the fundamental and original source for all that exists, and therefore all reality needs to be explained in terms of nature. All events find an adequate explanation within nature itself. Dubray (1911)(2007: 1).

I highly doubt that naturalism and empiricism can ever fully explain all reality. The infinite nature of God, for example, as spirit (John 4: 24), makes this highly unlikely.


Cited 

Our souls do not disappear when our bodies die 

Two specialists claim that while our bodies die, our consciousness – or soul – lives on indefinitely after significant investigation. Quantum mechanics, they claim, enables this. Quantum mechanics is a branch of physics that studies how matter behaves at the atomic and subatomic levels. It explains the properties of molecules and atoms, as well as the processes that produce them. 

This includes the following: Neurons Electrons Protons Quarks Gluons Other esoteric particles 

Consciousness, according to scientists Stuart Hameroff and Sir Roger Penrose, is simply information stored at the quantum level. 

My British theses work required me to research and cite scientific and philosophical journals in regards to consciousness.


Rocco J. Gennaro (2006) of Indiana State University documents grammatically that the main term under review, consciousness is derived from the Latin con (with) Gennaro (2006: 1). and scire (know). Gennaro (2006: 1).

Michael Winkelman (2004) of the American Anthropological Association writes that common understanding of a model of consciousness includes attention-awareness, phenomenal experiences, self-referencing, learning and the use of information, interpreting meanings, having goals, and systems of social reference.[6] Winkelman (2004: 1). 


Cited 

Orchestrated Objective Reduction This storage procedure, according to the duo, is called Orchestrated Objective Reduction (Orch-OR). This is accomplished by protein-based microtubules, a structural component of human cells that carries quantum information. 

Cited 

If the person is resuscitated...

...the information simply returns to the microtubules, and the person regains consciousness. A “near-death experience” is what we term it. If, on the other hand, the patient dies, their awareness may exist as a soul outside of the body. 

Cited 

'What we consider the here and now, this world, it is actually just the material level that is comprehensible,” explaines Dr Hans-Peter Durr. “The beyond is an infinite reality that is much bigger.” 

Theologically and philosophically, I consider only God as infinite reality. Everything else is finite creation. But, I think I get the point being made here that there is according to some scientists and physicists, a reasonable possibility that reality exists, beyond what is presently known within empirical science.

Cited 

Consciousness is derived from deeper level microtubule vibrations, according to Hameroff and Penrose’s study. This not only aids in a better understanding of human consciousness, but it may also aid in the treatment of mental, neurological, and cognitive disorders. 



Cited

“Illusion of Death” -In the Quantum Universe We Exist Indefinitely Posted on Jul 5, 2019 

Cited 

The renowned mathematical physicist, Sir Roger Penrose at the University of Oxford and researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in Munich suggest that the physical universe that we live in is only our perception and once our physical bodies die, there is an infinite beyond. Some believe that consciousness travels to parallel universes after death. 

 Cited 

“The beyond is an infinite reality that is much bigger… which this world is rooted in. In this way, our lives in this plane of existence are encompassed, surrounded, by the afterworld already… The body dies but the spiritual quantum field continues. In this way, I am immortal.” 

Cited 

In “Beyond Biocentrism: Rethinking Time, Space, Consciousness, and the Illusion of Death,” Robert Lanza asks “does the soul exist?” The theory he propounds says we’re immortal and exist outside of time. Biocentrism postulates that space and time are not the hard objects we think. Death does not exist in a timeless, spaceless world. His new scientific theory suggests that death is not the terminal event we think. 

The biblical concepts of paradise (heaven 1) and hades (hell 1) are where post-mortem souls/spirits are present. This appears to be different realms created by God, specifically for a post-mortem context. The culminated Kingdom of God (heaven 2) is a restored universe and earth (Revelation 20-22, 2 Peter 3). The lake of fire (hell 2) is where death and hades are cast into in Revelation 20.




Cited 

Can our brains help prove the universe is conscious? By David Crookes , All About Space magazine published 29 days ago (2022) 

Cited 

"Consciousness — or better, conscious experience — is obviously a part of reality," Johannes Kleiner, a mathematician and theoretical physicist at the Munich Center For Mathematical Philosophy, Germany, shared in an interview. "We're all having it but without understanding how it relates to the known physics, our understanding of the universe is incomplete." With that in mind, Kleiner is hoping math will enable him to precisely define consciousness. Working with colleague Sean Tull, a mathematician at the University of Oxford, U.K., the pair are being driven, to some degree, by a philosophical point of view called panpsychism. 

Cited 

This claims consciousness is inherent in even the tiniest pieces of matter — an idea that suggests the fundamental building blocks of reality have conscious experience. Crucially, it implies consciousness could be found throughout the universe. 

Cited 

"A mathematical theory can be applied to many different systems, not just brains," Kleiner told All About Space via email. "If you develop a mathematical model of consciousness based on data obtained from brains, you can apply the model to other systems, for example, computers or thermostats, to see what it says about their conscious experience too." 

Cited 

And if it's shown that the universe is conscious, what then? What are the consequences? "There might be moral implications. We tend to treat systems that have conscious experiences different from systems that don't," said Kleiner. Yet if it is proven that consciousness plays a causal role in the universe, it would have huge consequences for the scientific view of the world, said Kleiner. "It could lead to a scientific revolution on a par with the one initiated by Galileo Galilei," he said. Advertisement And that really is something to bear in mind.

A conscious soul/spirit, post-mortem implies a conscious, infinite, eternal, first-cause, that is in my theistic view, the biblical God. This implies that there are moral implications such as judgement of post--mortem persons (Revelation 20, perhaps general, 2 Corinthians 5, for those within the Christian Church in particular) for deeds (Revelation 20).

Revelation 20:12 New American Standard Bible (NASB): And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne, and books were opened; and another book was opened, which is the book of life; and the dead were judged from the things which were written in the books, according to their deeds.

Those within the book of life, have their deeds and sins covered by the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ, biblically speaking. The remaining, fully judged for deeds, become residence of the lake of fire (Revelation 20).
---

ARISTOTLE (1936) Physics, Translated by Apostle, Hippocrates G. (with Commentaries and Glossary). Oxford: University Press. 

ARISTOTLE (2018). Physics, Translated by Reeve, C. D. C. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing Company.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) ‘A priori/A posteriori’, in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, p. 21-22. Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BONJOUR, LAURENCE. (1996) ‘A Priori’, in Robert Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

BUTCHAROV, PANAYOT (1996) ‘Metaphysics’, in Robert Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

DUBRAY, C.A. (1911)(2007) ‘Naturalism’ in New Advent: Catholic Encyclopedia, New York, Robert Appleton Company.http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10713a.htm 

EDWARDS, PAUL AND ARTHUR PAP (1973) (eds), ‘A priori knowledge: Introduction’, A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press. 

GENNARO, ROCCO, J. (2006) ‘Consciousness’, in The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Martin, Tennessee, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

GUYER, PAUL AND ALLEN W, in KANT, IMMANUEL (1781)(1787)(1998) Critique of Pure Reason, Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

HUME, DAVID (1739-1740)(1973) ‘A Treatise of Human Nature’, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press. 

HUME, DAVID (1779)(2004) Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, Lawrence, Kansas. 

KANT, IMMANUEL (1781)(1787)(1998) Critique of Pure Reason, Translated and edited by Paul Guyer and Allen W. Wood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

KANT, IMMANUEL (1781)(1787)(1929)(2006) Critique of Pure Reason, Translated by Norman Kemp Smith, London, Macmillan. 

KANT, IMMANUEL (1788)(1997) Critique of Practical Reason, Translated by Mary Gregor (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 

KANT, IMMANUEL (1788)(1898)(2006) The Critique of Practical Reason, Translated by Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, London, Longmans, Green, and Co. 

KANT, IMMANUEL (1791)(2001) ‘On The Miscarriage of All Philosophical Trials in Theodicy’, in Religion and Rational Theology, Translated by George di Giovanni and Allen Wood, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 

KENT, JOHN (1999) ‘Positivism’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd. 

KRIKORIAN, K. (1944)(2007) (ed.), Naturalism and the Human Spirit, New York, Columbia University Press, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/naturalism/

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

POJMAN, LOUIS P. (1996) Philosophy: The Quest for Truth, New York, Wadsworth Publishing Company. 

WEIRICH, PAUL. (1996) ‘Comte, Auguste’, in Robert Audi (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

WINKELMAN, MICHAEL (2004) ‘Understanding Consciousness Using Systems Approaches and Lexical Universal’, American Anthropological Association, Arlington, Virginia, American Anthropological Association.

Sunday, March 20, 2022

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part I

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed: Part I

THE ORTHODOX STUDY BIBLE, NEW TESTAMENT AND PSALMS (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Nashville, Tennessee, Thomas Nelson Publishers

The review of this fine, academic, source continues.

Glossary from Reverend John Morris, PhD

Quote

'A statement of belief. Creeds in their earlier form were used by the apostles, and many are recorded in the New Testament (Eph. 5: 14; 1 Tim. 3: 16; 2 Tim. 2:11-13). The creed used throughout the Church was adopted at the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and expanded at the Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381. The Nicene Creed is used at baptisms, the Divine Liturgy, and in personal prayers.' (796).

Comments

From my Reformed, Anabaptist (evangelical) theological background, the Divine Liturgy is not terminology used. This is within Orthodoxy, language for the 'Eucharistic service of the Orthodox Church'. (802).

Orthodox Church in America: The Divine Liturgy 

Cited 

'The word liturgy means common work or common action. The Divine Liturgy is the common work of the Orthodox Church. It is the official action of the Church formally gathered together as the chosen People of God. The word church, as we remember, means a gathering or assembly of people specifically chosen and called apart to perform a particular task.'

Cited

'The Divine Liturgy is the common action of Orthodox Christians officially gathered to constitute the Orthodox Church. It is the action of the Church assembled by God in order to be together in one community to worship, to pray, to sing, to hear God’s Word, to be instructed in God’s commandments, to offer itself with thanksgiving in Christ to God the Father, and to have the living experience of God’s eternal kingdom through communion with the same Christ Who is present in his people by the Holy Spirit.'

Cited 

'The Divine Liturgy is always done by Orthodox Christians on the Lord’s Day which is Sunday, the “day after Sabbath” which is symbolic of the first day of creation and the last day—or as it is called in Holy Tradition, the eighth day—of the Kingdom of God. This is the day of Christ’s resurrection from the dead, the day of God’s judgment and victory predicted by the prophets, the Day of the Lord which inaugurates the presence and the power of the “kingdom to come” already now within the life of this present world.' 

'The Divine Liturgy is also celebrated by the Church on special feast days.' 

Saint George Greek Orthodox Cathedral: The Divine Liturgy

Greenville, South Carolina

Cited 

'What is the Purpose of the Divine Liturgy? The transformation of wine, water and bread into the Divine Body and Blood of Christ; for the sanctification of the faithful, who receive remission of their sins and the inheritance of the kingdom of heaven. St.Cabasilas 

It is the coming together of the heavenly Kingdom with earthly life. The Church of heaven, the Church triumphant, and the church here on earth, the Church Militant, join in this grand celebration to glorify God and to be in union with Him. 

We come to this service to be transformed through the partaking of Holy Communion. This is the same as saying we partake of Jesus Christ's Flesh and Divinity. Holy Communion and the Divine Liturgy cannot be separated. This the greatest of all mysteries. All should come prepared to be partakers of the Divine gift.'

Cited

'What is the Meaning of the Word Liturgy? The word Liturgy comes from an ancient Greek word leitos (people) and erogon (work), Literally it means the work of the people. This word was used initially to refer to service given to the state by citizens for the betterment of the public good. We can think of the divine Liturgy as the public work for the benefit of the people so God’s people will be cared for by Him. As we participate in this service we are serving God through our work in the Divine Liturgy.'

Wikipedia: Liturgy 

λειτουργία/leitourgia 


'Liturgy (leitourgia) is a Greek composite word meaning originally a public duty, a service to the state undertaken by a citizen. Its elements are leitos (from leos = laos, people) meaning public, and ergo (obsolete in the present stem, used in future erxo, etc.), to do. From this we have leitourgos, "a man who performs a public duty", "a public servant", often used as equivalent to the Roman lictor; then leitourgeo, "to do such a duty", leitourgema, its performance, and leitourgia, the public duty itself.'


Smartfaith.net

Cited 

'Kevin Simington (B.Th. Dip. Min.) is a theologian, apologist and social commentator.' 

Cited 

'Contrary to some people’s misguided views, liturgy was not a later ‘add-on’ instituted by a stultified church but was a vital part of Christian worship from the very beginning. The New Testament contains many references to the ongoing practice of liturgical worship as well as actual examples of first century liturgy.'

Comments

The smartfaith.net comments are in agreement with the Orthodox Study Bible, in as much that liturgy was practiced within the New Testament and the New Testament era. To use the first New Testament reference from the Orthodox text, quoting a saying in Ephesians 5: 14:

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

14 For this reason [a]it says, “Awake, sleeper, And arise from the dead, And Christ will shine on you.” 

Footnotes a) Ephesians 5:14 Or He

The Orthodoxy text uses the 

New King James Version (NKJV)

14 Therefore He says: “Awake, you who sleep, Arise from the dead, And Christ will give you light.”

The Orthodoxy text states that verse 14 is an early baptism hymn, and that baptism is illumination. (450).

From my Reformed and Anabaptist perspective, baptism is a key New Testament practice (ordinance or sacrament, depending on the denomination) that represents a sign of regeneration (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter 1: 23) for a believer. 

1 Peter 3: 21

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you—not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience—through the resurrection of Jesus Christ...
---

A good conscience exists via regeneration and the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ to a believer.

From this brief review in Part 1, we can see that a creed is a statement of belief; whereas liturgy is a form of public worship. So, a liturgy may be a creed and vice-versa.

Both are a biblical means of expressing theological truths. 

Selected source from cited links 

Fortescue, A. (1910). Liturgy, In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved March 20, 2022 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09306a.htm

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Brief Bullets on Testosterone (Thanks to The Rage for the link)

 

• At the roughly 6 minute mark forward: Agreed, within pornography, sexual success, is a lie.

• In my opinion, the man (person) that visits a prostitute is also not a sexual success.

• 1 Corinthians 6:15-16: King James Version (KJV) 15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. 16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh

• Beware of spiritual, sexual bonding, to the wrong type of partner, and/or too many partners.

• @ roughly the 7 minute mark, Wilson (paraphrased) seems to make a connection between the, as he notes, decline of testosterone and the rise of the acceptance of pornography. 

• By God's grace, I am not addicted to pornography. 

• By God's grace, I am not declining in a manly sense.

• @ roughly the 8: 40 mark forward, the (paraphrased) responsible men, in my view, in a Christian sense, require willing relatable female partners to work with.

•  NOT, as many assume in the Church, simply and always based on similar age and level of looks.

•  Especially, as the intellectual, non-conformist types, like myself, often resent being boxed in with such limited philosophical depth and limited use of reason.

•  Rather a legitimate, biblical, relationship leading to marriage, is based on significant, but not necessarily near maximal, mutual, spiritual, intellectual and romantic attraction.

• @ 9: 20 roughly forward: Agreed, (paraphrased) there are physically attractive women in pornography. 

• But, it is a destructive attractiveness...

ELWELL, WALTER AND YARBROUGH, ROBERT W., Third Edition (2013) Encountering The New Testament, Grand Rapids, Baker Academic. 

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring The New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books. 

FEE, GORDON D. (1987) The First Epistle To The Corinthians, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

MARSH, PAUL, W. (1986) ‘1 Corinthians’, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

Tuesday, March 01, 2022

Contradictory premises/Pulling the carpet II

Photo: January 17, 2022, NASA

Contradictory premises/Pulling the carpet II

Part II of a posting from 2016.

Thursday, August 04, 2016: Contradictory premises: Pull the carpet...

Contradictory premises 

From

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London. 

'The problem with contradictory premises is that they cannot both be true. If one is true, the other must be false, and vice versa. In other words, we can be certain that at least one of them must be false, and cannot generate a sound argument.' (69). We do not need to see the conclusion here, we already reasonably know, that at least the premises are contradictory. One premise might be true, but not both. A valid argument can have a false premise. (69). As long as the premise (s) are not true and the conclusion false, it is logically possible to have a valid argument. 

Premise-Conclusion

TT, FF, FT, TF 

A true premise (s) and false conclusion (TF) from these combinations, cannot possibly be logically valid. However, as Pire recognizes, a sound (true) argument has all true premises. (69). It has a true conclusion. 

The classic 'the moon is made of green cheese' (69), is documented as a valid premise, but not a premise in a sound (true) argument. It is not reasonable from empirical, scientific evidence that the moon is made of green cheese, but it is not an illogical premise as such. 

I have suggested to my friends that in arguments, when one disagrees with the conclusion, deny a premise first, if that can be reasonably, truthfully done. This pulls the carpet. It prohibits one from being dragged into accepting a questionable conclusion after hastily accepting premises and then having to philosophically backtrack... 

Here is a common, paraphrased, psychological, motivational, premise and conclusion.

Premise

You are the main creator of your life.

Conclusion

Therefore, if it is going to be, it is up to you.
---

I deny the premise and pull the carpet, by stating:

God is infinite.

God is necessary.

God is the primary cause of all things.

A human being is finite.

A human being is contingent (dependent on what is necessary as the sufficient cause).

A human being is a secondary cause (of some things).
---

I also deny the conclusion, simultaneously. If it is going to be, it is secondarily up to you.


Cited 

Confusion of Necessary with a Sufficient Condition 

A causal fallacy you commit this fallacy when you assume that a necessary condition of an event is sufficient for the event to occur. A necessary condition is a condition that must be present for an event to occur. A sufficient condition is a condition or set of conditions that will produce the event. A necessary condition must be there, but it alone does not provide sufficient cause for the occurrence of the event. Only the sufficient grounds can do this. In other words, all of the necessary elements must be there. 

Cited 

I don't know why the car won't run; I just filled the gas tank. 

A sufficient condition is a condition or set of conditions that will produce the event.

The vehicle needs to be started too. A missing premise.

I reason that as God is the necessary cause of all things, directly or indirectly, God is also the sufficient cause of all things. As a theistic philosopher of religion and theologian within the Reformed tradition, everything that occurs is caused by God, either directly willed, or indirectly willed, which could also be called, allowed.


Necessary versus Sufficient conditions

Philosopher Blackburn explains... 

'If p is a necessary condition of q, then q cannot be true unless p is true. If p is a sufficient condition of q, then given that p is true, q is so as well.' (73). Blackburn provides the example: Steering well is a necessary condition of driving well... (73). But it is not sufficient, as one can steer well, but be an overall bad driver. (73). Perhaps, one steers very well, but is overly occupied by texting while driving. (My add, and not my practice) 

This concept from Blackburn with the use of symbolic logic, provides a level of complexity, yet consistent and logical at the same time. But providing a true example provides another level of difficulty. 

A solid/true example

Infinite attributes (a) are a necessary condition of infinite nature (b). 

Infinite attributes (a) are a necessary condition of infinite nature (b), then infinite nature (b) cannot be true unless infinite attributes (a) are true. If infinite attributes (a) are a sufficient condition of infinite nature (b), then given that infinite attributes (a) are true, then infinite nature (b) is so as well. 

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London. 

Edited for an entry on academia.edu, April 22, 2022