Venice: trekearth |
Preface:
My work week ends early as I am taking today, Friday, off to see Rush at Rogers Arena. This will be the tenth time viewing Rush and perhaps the last, as they are ending major touring.
I thought I would once again look through my MPhil/PhD theses material for something not fully presented previously and I had dealt with privation previously mostly from the perspective of Augustine and John Hick that were major and significant PhD exemplars.
------
Thomas Aquinas (1261)(1920) writes in Summa Theologiae that evil was only possible from a corruption of the good.[1] Leibniz noted that evil itself only comes from privation.[2]
My work week ends early as I am taking today, Friday, off to see Rush at Rogers Arena. This will be the tenth time viewing Rush and perhaps the last, as they are ending major touring.
I thought I would once again look through my MPhil/PhD theses material for something not fully presented previously and I had dealt with privation previously mostly from the perspective of Augustine and John Hick that were major and significant PhD exemplars.
------
Thomas Aquinas (1261)(1920) writes in Summa Theologiae that evil was only possible from a corruption of the good.[1] Leibniz noted that evil itself only comes from privation.[2]
Since evil cannot exist by itself[3] it
would be impossible, in Augustine’s view, for all good to be removed from the
nature of a being as there would therefore be no entirely, purely evil entity.[4] He went on to say that an incorruptible
nature, such as that of God, would be far better than a corruptible nature,[5] but for the corruptible nature to exist it
must possess some goodness.[6]
John Hick concludes that Augustine and
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) were not content with merely establishing a Biblical
doctrine of God’s goodness and the related goodness of his creation.[7]
Augustine and Aquinas were
influenced by Neo-Platonic thought and equated being with goodness, so that greater existence (existence
without evil) meant greater goodness.[8] Aquinas postulates that everything desired as an end is
perfection,[9] and that since every nature desires its own being and perfection,
this is good.[10] Therefore evil cannot
signify a being, form, or nature, as evil is not desirable and is only possible
by corrupting the good.[11]
It appears that Hick’s point is reasonable,[12]
at least to the extent that greater goodness does not equal greater existence.[13] This is difficult to measure because as
discussed previously in this work, much of traditional theology states that all
creation has been corrupted.[14]
We are therefore comparing imperfect
creatures that are in existence with hypothetical perfect creatures, and we are
attempting to judge whether or not these hypothetical creatures would have
greater existence because they were perfectly good. This becomes a very speculative procedure,
and I agree with Hick that the Augustinian view of God’s goodness is accurate
in regard to human goodness being secondary to God’s, as finite beings contain
finite goodness.[15] Hick, however, denies the
metaphysical doctrine that human beings were created good,[16]
and I would respectfully differ siding with Augustinian and Reformed
traditions.[17]
AQUINAS, THOMAS
(1261)(1920) Summa Theologica,
Translated by Fathers of the English
Dominican Province, London, Fathers of the English Dominican
Province.
AUGUSTINE
(388-395)(1964) On Free Choice of the
Will, Translated by Anna S.Benjamin and L.H. Hackstaff, Upper Saddle River,
N.J., Prentice Hall.
AUGUSTINE
(398-399)(1992) Confessions,
Translated by Henry Chadwick, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
AUGUSTINE
(400-416)(1987)(2004) On the Trinity,
Translated by Reverend Arthur West Haddan, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers,
Series One, Volume 3, Denver, The Catholic Encyclopedia.
http://www.newadvent.org/fathers/130104.htm
AUGUSTINE
(421)(1998) Enchiridion, Translated
by J.F. Shaw, Denver, The Catholic
Encyclopedia.
AUGUSTINE
(426)(1958) The City of God,
Translated by Gerald G. Walsh, Garden City, New York, Image Books.
AUGUSTINE
(427)(1997) On Christian Doctrine,
Translated by D.W. Robertson Jr., Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall.
AUGUSTINE
(427b)(1997) On Christian Teaching,
Translated by R.P.H. Green, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1539)(1998) The Institutes of the
Christian Religion, Book II, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids,
The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1539)(1998) The Institutes of the
Christian Religion, Book IV, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids,
The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College.
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.html
CALVIN, JOHN
(1540)(1973) Romans and Thessalonians,
Translated by Ross Mackenzie, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation
of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1550)(1978) Concerning Scandals,
Translated by John W. Fraser, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1552)(1995) Acts, Translated by
Watermark, Nottingham, Crossway Books.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1553)(1952) Job, Translated by Leroy
Nixon, Grand Rapids, Baker Book
House.
CALVIN, JOHN
(1554)(1965) Genesis, Translated by
John King, Edinburgh, The Banner of Truth Trust.
HICK, JOHN
(1970) Evil and The God of Love,
London, The Fontana Library.
HICK, JOHN
(1978) ‘Present and Future Life’, Harvard
Theological Review, Volume 71, Number 1-2, January-April, Harvard
University.
HICK, JOHN
(1981) Encountering Evil, Stephen T.
Davis (ed.), Atlanta, John Knox Press.
HICK, JOHN
(1993) ‘Afterword’ in GEIVETT, R.
DOUGLAS (1993) Evil and the Evidence for
God, Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
HICK, JOHN
(1993) The Metaphor of God Incarnate,
Louisville, Kentucky, John Know Press.
HICK, JOHN
(1994) Death and Eternal Life,
Louisville, Kentucky, John Knox Press.
HICK, JOHN
(1999) ‘Life after Death’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology,
Kent, SCM Press.
LEIBNIZ, G.W.
(1710)(1998) Theodicy, Translated by
E.M. Huggard Chicago, Open Court Classics.
SCHELLING,
F.W.J. (1845)(1936) Schelling, Of Human
Freedom, Translated by James Gutmann, The Open Court Publishing Company,
Chicago.
[1] Aquinas (1261)(1920: 1.48.1).
[2] Leibniz (1710)(1998: 219). Schelling also discusses this view of
Leibniz. Schelling (1845)(1936: 45).
[4] Augustine (421)(1998: Chapter 13: 7).
[6] Augustine (421)(1998: Chapter 13: 7).
[7] Hick (1970: 176).
[8] Hick (1970: 176). Augustine (388-395)(1964: 117). Augustine (421)(1998: Chapter 13: 7). Aquinas (1261)(1920: 1.48.1).
[10] Aquinas (1261)(1920: 1.48.1).
[11] Aquinas (1261)(1920: 1.48.1).
[13] Although I reason
God is infinitely good and Satan, for example, can at best be finitely evil.
But satanic power can conceivably grow.
[15] Hick (1970: 178).
[17] Augustine (388-395)(1964: 33). Calvin (1539)(1998: Book II, Chapter 2, 7).
Rome: Facebook |
Also on Privation
June 28, 2007 Augustine and Hick
November 19, 2008 Augustine and Hick