Monday, April 30, 2018

Repentance

Windows Wallpaper

I presented a version on this on Satire Und Theology, Sunday. I have added material...
---

Repentance

Our pastor spoke well, on repentance on Sunday.

From my Reformed perspective, God causes regeneration in the chosen person (s), in Christ (Ephesians 1, 2, Romans 8-9).

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Ephesians 1

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ, 4 just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before [d]Him. In love 5 [e]He predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ to Himself, according to the [f]kind intention of His will, 6 to the praise of the glory of His grace, which He freely bestowed on us in the Beloved. 7 In [g]Him we have redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of His grace 8 which He [h]lavished on [i]us.

Ephesians 2 later...

Romans 8

28 And we know that [k]God causes all things to work together for good to those who love God, to those who are called according to His purpose. 29 For those whom He foreknew, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brethren; 30 and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified.

Romans 9 14

What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15 For he says to Moses, “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy, and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”[f] 16 It does not, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. 17 For Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”[g] 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?

God causes this regeneration as primary cause and it is embraced by those in Christ as a secondary cause. The divine, primary cause alone actually saves a person. Secondary cause here means a human being embraces the work of the primary cause as opposed to by force or coercion. This compatibilistic approach therefore features soft and not hard determinism.

Non-exhaustive examples of God regenerating:

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Titus 3:5-7 5

He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, 6 whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, 7 so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs [a]according to the hope of eternal life.

John 3 3

Now there was a man of the Pharisees, named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews; 2 this man came to Jesus by night and said to Him, “Rabbi, we know that You have come from God as a teacher; for no one can do these [a]signs that You do unless God is with him.” 3 Jesus answered and said to him, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born [b]again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”

Within my Reformed theology, in the salvation process, regeneration would include (non-exhaustively) God providing grace, faith, (legal) justification, sanctification and repentance to persons. Atonement is multifaceted with many aspects, but a key is that God the Son, Jesus Christ, within the triune Godhead, provides these to human beings by divine power alone.

God enlightening someone, now in Christ, to repent is as an aspect of human salvation by grace through faith alone. The person in Christ, embracing repentance or any aspect of salvation, does not technically save that person, but this is the person embracing this aspect his/her salvation, which is the atoning and resurrection work of God the Son, Jesus Christ applied.

I acknowledge there are other examples in the New Testament such as James that state:

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

James 2:24 24

You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.

Ephesians 2: 8-10 8

For by grace you have been saved through faith; and [h]that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

The justification discussed in James is a justification of works, as in a sign on true regeneration and faith is works. Someone that is not regenerated will not have the works mentioned in both James 2 and Ephesians 2: 10.

Barclay reasons that Paul and James are not in disagreement. (79). Faith and deeds are not opposites, they are inseparable. (79). Someone must be moved to faith by God, and that faith will demonstrate works for God.

Lexicon

παλιγγενεσία

Root word From πάλιν (G3825) and γένεσις (G1078)

new birth, reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration

Lexicon

γεννάω

From a variation of γένος (G1085) γεννάω gennáō, ghen-nah'-o; from a variation of G1085

to procreate (properly, of the father, but by extension of the mother); figuratively, to regenerate:—bear, beget, be born, bring forth, conceive, be delivered of, gender, make, spring. 

Lexicon

ἄνωθεν 

Root word From ἄνω (G507) ἄνωθεν ánōthen, an'-o-then; from G507 

from above; by analogy, from the first; by implication, anew:—from above, again, from the beginning (very first), the top.

BARCLAY, WILLIAM (1976) The Letters of James and Peter, Philadelphia, The Westminster Press.

STRONG, J. (1890)(1986) Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Burlington, Welch Publishing Company.

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Hylozoism

Miami Beach: trekearth.com

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

A busy day driving around for work and typing in a warm office. Another 'new word' for me.

Hylozoism is the doctrine that all matter is endowed with life. (182).

Cambridge states (paraphrased) that this is the view that all matter is by nature alive or that all bodies have some degree of life. (352). In modern times, hylozoism is connected to animism and is considered a naive view by many philosophers. (355). Cambridge writes that some theistic philosophers have claimed this is a form of atheism. (355)

To connect this doctrine with atheism supposes, in my view, reasoning along the lines that
if everything in existence in the universe, naturally is life, there is no need of a first cause or God to create.

To insist finite matter could have always existed is to fall prey to a vicious regress, which is a regress which never solves its own problem and is not reasonable, even as philosophers debate whether
a vicious regress can be logical or not. Premises can be logical, as can conclusions, without being necessarily true. I have come to the conclusion that a vicious regress can be logical, but is unreasonable.

For example, this god was caused by this god, this god was caused by this god, to infinity.

Logical, not contradictory, as a god without contradiction could be caused by another god, to infinity;
but not reasonable as each of these gods is finite and the finite has limited existence, not being eternal. What is reasonably required is an infinite, first cause, God, to begin, at least, a creation process. See Genesis 1, John 1 as examples within a biblical framework.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press

MOURELATOS, ALEXANDER, P.D. (1996) General Editor, Robert Audi, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Monday, April 23, 2018

Providence, sovereignty and human free will (MPhil & PhD Edit)

Today

MPhil, Bangor University, 2003: The Problem of Evil: Anglican and Baptist Perspectives 

Chapter 11, entitled The Mystery of Providence, is the centre piece of Carson’s book and sets out his philosophical outlook concerning the problem of evil in light of God’s sovereignty and human freedom.

Carson stated: The Bible as a whole, and sometimes in specific texts, presupposes or teaches that both of the following propositions are true:

1. God is absolutely sovereign, but his sovereignty never functions in such a way that human responsibility is curtailed, minimized, or mitigated.

2. Human beings are morally responsible creatures–they significantly choose, rebel, obey, believe, defy, make decisions, and so forth, and they are rightly held accountable for such actions; but this characteristic never functions so as to make God absolutely contingent...so far as the Bible is concerned, the two propositions are taught and are mutually compatible. Carson (1990: 201).

PhD, University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, 2010: Theodicy and Practical Theology

It could be understood that providence would be the method by which God has sovereign control over his creation, and as Calvin notes, God’s providence has him work through persons. Calvin (1543)(1996: 36). Philip Edgcumbe Hughes (1990) explains that through God’s providence the world is dependent, for if God did not maintain it, it would cease to exist. Hughes (1990: 45). In Law of Nature, Edwards (1731-1733)(2006) explains that providence is the means by which God governs the world as the supreme judge of the universe. Edwards (1731-1733)(2006: 553).

My MPhil and PhD view of compatibilism (soft determinism) allows for significantly free human beings to commit free actions, simultaneously influenced and determined by an outside force, but never with the use of constraint, coercion or force. If/when coercion or force is used, by a primary or secondary cause, upon another secondary cause, this cancels significant human (or angelic moral) responsibility as a secondary cause of thoughts, acts and actions. As under strain, significant limited free will would not exist.

God is reasoned the first cause of all things, with moral perfection as infinite and perfectly good.

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book II, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.html

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.html

CALVIN, JOHN (1540)(1973) Romans and Thessalonians, Translated by Ross Mackenzie, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. CALVIN, JOHN (1550)(1978) Concerning Scandals, Translated by John W. Fraser, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

CALVIN, JOHN (1552)(1995) Acts, Translated by Watermark, Nottingham, Crossway Books. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1553)(1952) Job, Translated by Leroy Nixon, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1554)(1965) Genesis, Translated by John King, Edinburgh, The Banner of Truth Trust.

CARSON, DONALD.A. (1981) Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility, Atlanta, John Knox Press.

CARSON, DONALD.A. (1990) How Long, O Lord?, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

CARSON, DONALD.A. (1996) The Gagging of God, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House. 

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1729)(2006) Sovereignty of God, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1731-1733)(2006) Law of Nature, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University.

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1754)(2006) Freedom of the Will, Flower Mound, Texas. Jonathanedwards.com.

HUGHES, PHILIP, EDGCUMBE (1990) A Commentary On The Epistle To The Hebrews, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Saturday, April 21, 2018

The universe is exhausted between them


LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York. (Philosophy)

The continuation of text review: I am half way through this text review.

Key symbols

≡df = Equivalence by definition
 : = Equal (s)
 ε = Epsilon and means is
⊃ = Is the same as
 ⊨ is Entails
˜ = Not
∃ = There exists
∃! = There exists
∴ = Therefore
· = Therefore
< = Is included
v = a logical inclusive disjunction (disjunction is the relationship between two distinct alternatives).
x = variable
. = Conjunction meaning And
0 = Null class
cls = Class
 int = Interpretation
---

The author summarizes on page 193. In symbolic logic, every class includes itself; every class includes the sub-classes of the sub-classes; every class is included in a universe class and includes an empty class. (193). The universe class is not the same as the universe of discourse. In other words the universe of discourse contains the universe class. The universe class does not contain the universe of discourse. Every class has a complement and the class and its complement are mutually exclusive. The universe is exhausted between them. (193). In other words, every class has a non-class.

Langer explains that by definition, mutual inclusion is called equality the sum of two elements a and b, which is written a + b and the product is shown as a x b. (193). Together they are the whole system of classes. (193).

Any two classes have a sum and product, if they are mutually exclusive (In symbolic logic) the product is 0. (193).

I reason based on Langer in regard to every class:

0 + 0 = 0
0 x 0 = 0

Based on my interpretation of Langer, if we created a universe of discourse  with a universe class of those within the Kingdom of God, the non-class would be those not within the Kingdom of God. This would equate to all of humanity. Or in other words, 0 persons would not be within the universe class.

There exists at least one class 0 that for any class cr (Christians) 1, 0 is included in a. (a + b).

There is a class of no Christians, in this universe of discourse.

In other philosophical words:

In these classes, Langer never assumes a universe class where there is not a non-version within.