Thursday, February 08, 2007

The Horror


Sundial, Chilleurs-Aux-Bois, France

This article is inspired by the extra cable movies channels my Mom has purchased. My Mom is a retired senior with some health issues and spends a fair amount of the time watching television and being on the internet. Many of the movies are of good quality, but some of the horror/suspense/thriller films seem to lack basic quality in the story and are very disturbing.

As a child and teenager I remember staying up late and watching some classic horror/suspense/thriller movies with Vincent Price such as Pit and the Pendulum (1961), The Raven (1963), The Abominable Dr. Phibes (1971), and Dr. Phibes Rises Again (1972). I personally do not enjoy watching this kind of material often, and I do not necessarily recommend that these films be viewed, but I have to admit that although these movies contained some disturbing scenes they were basically well written stories with good acting. These films although dealing with some evil subject matter still appeared to have significant artistic merit. Many of the current horror/suspense/thriller movies to me lack basic quality of story, have very disturbing scenes, glorify evil, and promote fear. I do not have a problem with evil being artistically shown in films in either the context of our real world or a fantasy world such as in The Wizard of OZ (1939), The Harry Potter series (2001), The Lord of the Rings Trilogy (2001), or in the excellent new Spanish film I just viewed in the theatre, Pan's Labyrinth (2006). I do not see much artistic merit in films that appear to focus on promoting evil as something that should be glorified as entertainment and at the same time promote a fear of evil. Many modern horror/suspense/thriller films seem more concerned with establishing an atmosphere of terror rather than an atmosphere of artistically looking at the problem of evil. Below are portions of reviews from screenit.com of some of the movies I have had the misfortune of running into with my remote control. I debated on whether or not to include graphic material as in torture details but decided not to, however, that information can be found through the links provided.

Hostel (2005)

http://www.screenit.com/movies/2006/hostel.html

The following is a brief summary of the content found in this R-rated horror/suspense film. Profanity consists of at least 100 "f" words, while many other expletives and colorful phrases are also uttered. Sexually explicit dialogue is present, as are several sexual encounters (featuring nudity, movement and sounds) and various views of nonsexual nudity (many views of bare breasts, butts and some female full frontal).

Violence consists of many people being tortured, wounded and killed via sadistic means, most of which has extremely bloody and gory results (the film is definitely not for the squeamish), and those scenes and other moments of peril will likely be quite unsettling or suspenseful to viewers. The perpetrators of such acts, those who support them, and others have bad attitudes, while some of that and other behavior might be enticing for some disturbed kids to imitate.


Saw (2004)

http://www.screenit.com/movies/2004/saw.html

Here's a brief summary of the content found in this R-rated suspense/thriller. Profanity consists of at least 27 "f" words, while other expletives and colorful phrases are uttered. Some brief, but sexually explicit dialogue is present, a man calls off an affair in a motel room and a man's bare butt is very briefly seen in a nonsexual context.

Violence consists of lethal and bloody acts where people are killed by various means and in various fashions (shootings, a head repeatedly smashed, etc.), others are threatened and/or severely injured, and the results of earlier, unseen violence are visible (with extremely grisly and bloody results).


Those scenes and other moments (including some jump scenes) may be disturbing, suspenseful or downright scary to viewers, especially those with low tolerance levels for such material as well as younger kids if allowed to watch this. The killer who's responsible for the deaths and sick traps obviously has a bad attitude, while a married man is noted as having an affair (with some other related tense family material being present). A man smokes several times and a woman is noted as being a drug addict, but no use occurs.

The Devil’s Reject’s (2005)

http://www.screenit.com/movies/2005/the_devils_rejects.html

Here's a brief summary of the content found in this suspense film that's been rated R. Profanity consists of at least 203 "f" words, while plenty of other expletives and colorful phrases are also uttered. Various instances of sexually explicit (and sometimes crude) dialogue are present (including talk of bestiality and necrophilia) as is a sex scene with nudity, movement and related sounds, other sexual material, and various instances of full frontal and partial female nudity, while scantly clad women are also seen.

Violence consists of people being killed by various means (gunfire, stabbing and much more), while there are also scenes of sadistic torture. Much of that has extremely bloody and gory results, and those scenes and other moments of peril might be disturbing and/or suspenseful to viewers. All of the main characters have extreme cases of bad attitudes (including the cop after the killers).


Thanks for reading.

Russ:)

11 comments:

  1. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0078788/

    Apocalypse Now (1979)

    Tagline: The Horror. . . The Horror. . .

    ReplyDelete
  2. I thought Apocalypse Now was a good, artistically made movie, admittedly with a number of disturbing scenes. It serves a noble purpose of reminding us that in certain situations, ordinary people can become conditioned to perpetrating horrific acts, and yet each person has their own choice to make. Not unlike Pan's Labyrinth.

    The reviews posted seem amusingly strange in always rating a character's "bad attitude". This term seems absurdly understated when talking about horror movie characters...

    ReplyDelete
  3. The reviews serve the purpose of the article, but I agree that "bad attitude" is a strange term to use.

    I saw Apocalypse Now in the theatre when I was kid and thought it was a decent film.

    Thanks Chuck.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't remember if Mr. Price was in it or not, but when I was little I watched "The Fall of The House of Usher". I remember being scared to death. I hated it then but I love it now. I love any movie that GIVES me emotion. If it makes me laugh, or cry, are scream, or sit up all night nervous about every sound, then it's a good movie.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the comment,

    I have to admit I would probably find the film somewhat interesting.

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0053925/

    House of Usher(1960)

    It does star Vincent Price.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "Saw" was truly disturbing and led me to question the mental health of whomever wrote it. That person is a perverse, depraved individual to dream up such sick and bizarre things.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Ruthie,

    I have had similar thoughts to yours when viewing portions of these films. I feel like turning away, or doing something to stop these situations, while some others, including the producers seemingly actually enjoy this type of material.

    Cheers.:)

    ReplyDelete
  8. When I was almost too young to remember (maybe 4 years old?), I saw the original "The Fly." I remember that I got so scared I hid behind the rocking chair I was sitting in.

    Many years ago, I was at my sister's house (I think), and they were showing "Pet Cemetery." The people in the movie acted so irritatingly stupid, that I got up and walked outside. When characters in a movie do things that are so unbelievably stupid that they endanger their own lives and the lives of others, and act like they have no brains at all, I just get irritated to the point that I want to punch one of them. To me, that movie wasn't scary; it was just extremely irritating. A lot of horror movies seem like that to me.

    Years ago, I rented "Wrong Turn." Though I don't normally like horror movies, I admit that I rented it only because it had Eliza Dushku in it, and at the time, I thought she was hot. Well, before the movie was over, I turned it off, and returned it to the video store. It showed unbelievably evil things, horrible torture, mass murder, and cannibalism. I was angry and offended.

    There are two other movies I remember completely offending me, although neither of them were horror movies.

    One was "Scarface." My brother-in-law has believed for years that "Scarface" is the greatest movie of all time, and he taught that to his kids. So, one day when I was at their house, one of my nephews found out that I had never seen the movie, and at first he didn't believe me, but then he was just totally shocked. He insisted that I absolutely HAD to see the movie, right then and there. So they put the movie on. Well, not only was I very much offended by the constant cursing, and continuously blasphemy of the Lord's Name, but shooting people and hacking them up so totally offended me, that I walked out of their house, and went for a long walk down the road. They couldn't understand my anger or my being offended, and they were mad that I had been offended by it.

    The other movie that really offended me was "Alexander" (2004). I rented the movie, thinking, "Cool! A movie about Alexander the Great, with sword fighting and all that!" Well, when they started showing the homosexual scenes (and I read that, because of criticism, they actually removed eight minutes from the DVD, cutting back the portrayal of homosexuality---I can't imagine how bad it had been BEFORE that editing!), I was so offended that I turned it off immediately and returned it to the video store that same night, without watching the rest of it. I told the workers at the store that I was returning it, and I refused to watch the rest of it, because I was deeply offended by it. They let me rent another movie at no extra charge.

    I read on Wikipedia that I wasn't the only one offended by the movie. A group of 25 Greek lawyers initially threatened to file a lawsuit against both Director Oliver Stone and the Warner Bros. film studio for what they claimed was an inaccurate portrayal of history. At the British premiere of the film, Stone blamed "raging fundamentalism in morality" for the film's United States box office failure.

    As I said, I don't normally watch horror movies. But the few I have watched have been more irritating than scary to me. I remember, many years ago, when I watched "Poltergeist," I was not scared when I watched it, but I had eerie thoughts about it the next day when I was out working on a roof. I don't like movies that leave you with a bad feeling. I like movies that leave you with a good feeling.

    The only movie in recent years that I remember being scary was "Signs" (2002). And, I was not really very scared when I watched it; only after the movie was over did I become a bit scared. Of course, the fact that I was watching the movie at 2 AM, alone in a strange house that I had never been in at night before, was the main reason. Every time I walked past this one window, I expected the alien (from the movie) to put his face up against the window from the outside. And, with the shower also having a window, while I was showering, I kept imagining that same alien suddenly pressing his face up against the window. Needless to say, I had a hard time getting to sleep.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To me, that movie wasn't scary; it was just extremely irritating. A lot of horror movies seem like that to me.

    I agree, Jeff. Many horror movies count too much on human stupidity.

    It showed unbelievably evil things, horrible torture, mass murder, and cannibalism. I was angry and offended.

    These things anger me as well.

    Eliza Dushku in it, and at the time, I thought she was hot.

    I will look her up.:)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Everyone leaves a legacy. How would you feel if you made some of these horrible horror films that are totally sick and depraved? What kind of accomplishment is that? These films are not art, they are filth!
    -Two Thumbs Down-

    ReplyDelete
  11. It is a reasonable deduction to think that $$$ overrides legacy in the minds of some of these movie producers. I do not know motives, but my point is a good one.

    ReplyDelete