Sunday, March 20, 2022

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed-Part I

The Orthodox Study Bible: Creed: Part I

THE ORTHODOX STUDY BIBLE, NEW TESTAMENT AND PSALMS (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Nashville, Tennessee, Thomas Nelson Publishers

The review of this fine, academic, source continues.

Glossary from Reverend John Morris, PhD

Quote

'A statement of belief. Creeds in their earlier form were used by the apostles, and many are recorded in the New Testament (Eph. 5: 14; 1 Tim. 3: 16; 2 Tim. 2:11-13). The creed used throughout the Church was adopted at the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325 and expanded at the Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381. The Nicene Creed is used at baptisms, the Divine Liturgy, and in personal prayers.' (796).

Comments

From my Reformed, Anabaptist (evangelical) theological background, the Divine Liturgy is not terminology used. This is within Orthodoxy, language for the 'Eucharistic service of the Orthodox Church'. (802).

Orthodox Church in America: The Divine Liturgy 

Cited 

'The word liturgy means common work or common action. The Divine Liturgy is the common work of the Orthodox Church. It is the official action of the Church formally gathered together as the chosen People of God. The word church, as we remember, means a gathering or assembly of people specifically chosen and called apart to perform a particular task.'

Cited

'The Divine Liturgy is the common action of Orthodox Christians officially gathered to constitute the Orthodox Church. It is the action of the Church assembled by God in order to be together in one community to worship, to pray, to sing, to hear God’s Word, to be instructed in God’s commandments, to offer itself with thanksgiving in Christ to God the Father, and to have the living experience of God’s eternal kingdom through communion with the same Christ Who is present in his people by the Holy Spirit.'

Cited 

'The Divine Liturgy is always done by Orthodox Christians on the Lord’s Day which is Sunday, the “day after Sabbath” which is symbolic of the first day of creation and the last day—or as it is called in Holy Tradition, the eighth day—of the Kingdom of God. This is the day of Christ’s resurrection from the dead, the day of God’s judgment and victory predicted by the prophets, the Day of the Lord which inaugurates the presence and the power of the “kingdom to come” already now within the life of this present world.' 

'The Divine Liturgy is also celebrated by the Church on special feast days.' 

Saint George Greek Orthodox Cathedral: The Divine Liturgy

Greenville, South Carolina

Cited 

'What is the Purpose of the Divine Liturgy? The transformation of wine, water and bread into the Divine Body and Blood of Christ; for the sanctification of the faithful, who receive remission of their sins and the inheritance of the kingdom of heaven.' St.Cabasilas 

Cited

'It is the coming together of the heavenly Kingdom with earthly life. The Church of heaven, the Church triumphant, and the church here on earth, the Church Militant, join in this grand celebration to glorify God and to be in union with Him. 

We come to this service to be transformed through the partaking of Holy Communion. This is the same as saying we partake of Jesus Christ's Flesh and Divinity. Holy Communion and the Divine Liturgy cannot be separated. This the greatest of all mysteries. All should come prepared to be partakers of the Divine gift.'

Cited

'What is the Meaning of the Word Liturgy? The word Liturgy comes from an ancient Greek word leitos (people) and erogon (work), Literally it means the work of the people. This word was used initially to refer to service given to the state by citizens for the betterment of the public good. We can think of the divine Liturgy as the public work for the benefit of the people so God’s people will be cared for by Him. As we participate in this service we are serving God through our work in the Divine Liturgy.'

Wikipedia: Liturgy 

λειτουργία/leitourgia 


'Liturgy (leitourgia) is a Greek composite word meaning originally a public duty, a service to the state undertaken by a citizen. Its elements are leitos (from leos = laos, people) meaning public, and ergo (obsolete in the present stem, used in future erxo, etc.), to do. From this we have leitourgos, "a man who performs a public duty", "a public servant", often used as equivalent to the Roman lictor; then leitourgeo, "to do such a duty", leitourgema, its performance, and leitourgia, the public duty itself.'

New Advent sources below. not cited by me personally

Cited

CABROL AND LECLERCQ, Monumenta Ecclesiæ Liturgica. I, Reliquiæ Liturgicæ Vetustissimæ (Paris, 1900-2); 

BRIGHTMAN, Liturgies Eastern and Western, I. Eastern Liturgies (Oxford, 1896); 

DANIEL, Codex Liturgicus Ecclesiæ universæ (4 vols., Leipzig, 1847-53); 

RAUSCHEN, Florilegium Patristicum, VII. Monumenta eucharistica et liturgica vetustissima (Bonn, 1909); FUNK, Patres Apostolici (2 vols., Tübingen, 1901), and Didascalia et Constitutiones Apostolorum (Paderborn, 1905), the quotations in this article are made from these editions; 

PROBST, Liturgie der drei ersten christl. Jahrh. (Tübingen, 1870); 

IDEM, Liturgie des vierten Jahr. u. deren Reform (Münster, 1893); 

DREWS, Untersuchungen über die sogenannte clementin. Liturgie (Tübingen, 1906); 

DUCHESNE, Origines du Cuite chrét. (Paris, 1898); 

RAUSCHEN, Eucharistie und Buss-sakrament in den ersten sechs Jahrh. der Kirche (Freiburg, 1908); 

CABROL, Les Origines liturgiques (Paris, 1906); 

IDEM, Introduction aux Etudes liturgiques (Paris, 1907). For further bibliography see articles on each liturgy. For liturgical languages, as well as liturgical science, treating of the regulation, history, and dogmatic value of the Liturgy, see RITES.


Smartfaith.net

Cited 

'Kevin Simington (B.Th. Dip. Min.) is a theologian, apologist and social commentator.' 

Cited 

'Contrary to some people’s misguided views, liturgy was not a later ‘add-on’ instituted by a stultified church but was a vital part of Christian worship from the very beginning. The New Testament contains many references to the ongoing practice of liturgical worship as well as actual examples of first century liturgy.'

Comments

The smartfaith.net comments are in agreement with the Orthodox Study Bible, in as much that liturgy was practiced within the New Testament and the New Testament era. To use the first New Testament reference from the Orthodox text, quoting a saying in Ephesians 5: 14:

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

14 For this reason [a]it says, “Awake, sleeper, And arise from the dead, And Christ will shine on you.” 

Footnotes a) Ephesians 5:14 Or He

The Orthodoxy text uses the 

New King James Version (NKJV)

14 Therefore He says: “Awake, you who sleep, Arise from the dead, And Christ will give you light.”

The Orthodoxy text states that verse 14 is an early baptism hymn, and that baptism is illumination. (450).

From my Reformed and Anabaptist perspective, baptism is a key New Testament practice (ordinance or sacrament, depending on the denomination) that represents a sign of regeneration (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter 1: 23) for a believer. 

1 Peter 3: 21

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

Corresponding to that, baptism now saves you—not the removal of dirt from the flesh, but an appeal to God for a good conscience—through the resurrection of Jesus Christ...
---

A good conscience exists via regeneration and the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ to a believer.

From this brief review in Part 1, we can see that a creed is a statement of belief; whereas liturgy is a form of public worship. So, a liturgy may be a creed and vice-versa.

Both are a biblical means of expressing theological truths. 

Selected source from cited links 

Fortescue, A. (1910). Liturgy, In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved March 20, 2022 from New Advent: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09306a.htm

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Brief Bullets on Testosterone (Thanks to The Rage for the link)

 

• At the roughly 6 minute mark forward: Agreed, within pornography, sexual success, is a lie.

• In my opinion, the man (person) that visits a prostitute is also not a sexual success.

• 1 Corinthians 6:15-16: King James Version (KJV) 15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ? shall I then take the members of Christ, and make them the members of an harlot? God forbid. 16 What? know ye not that he which is joined to an harlot is one body? for two, saith he, shall be one flesh

• Beware of spiritual, sexual bonding, to the wrong type of partner, and/or too many partners.

• @ roughly the 7 minute mark, Wilson (paraphrased) seems to make a connection between the, as he notes, decline of testosterone and the rise of the acceptance of pornography. 

• By God's grace, I am not addicted to pornography. 

• By God's grace, I am not declining in a manly sense.

• @ roughly the 8: 40 mark forward, the (paraphrased) responsible men, in my view, in a Christian sense, require willing relatable female partners to work with.

•  NOT, as many assume in the Church, simply and always based on similar age and level of looks.

•  Especially, as the intellectual, non-conformist types, like myself, often resent being boxed in with such limited philosophical depth and limited use of reason.

•  Rather a legitimate, biblical, relationship leading to marriage, is based on significant, but not necessarily near maximal, mutual, spiritual, intellectual and romantic attraction.

• @ 9: 20 roughly forward: Agreed, (paraphrased) there are physically attractive women in pornography. 

• But, it is a destructive attractiveness...

ELWELL, WALTER AND YARBROUGH, ROBERT W., Third Edition (2013) Encountering The New Testament, Grand Rapids, Baker Academic. 

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring The New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books. 

FEE, GORDON D. (1987) The First Epistle To The Corinthians, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

MARSH, PAUL, W. (1986) ‘1 Corinthians’, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

Tuesday, March 01, 2022

Contradictory premises/Pulling the carpet II

Photo: January 17, 2022, NASA

Contradictory premises/Pulling the carpet II

Part II of a posting from 2016.

Thursday, August 04, 2016: Contradictory premises: Pull the carpet...

Contradictory premises 

From

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London. 

'The problem with contradictory premises is that they cannot both be true. If one is true, the other must be false, and vice versa. In other words, we can be certain that at least one of them must be false, and cannot generate a sound argument.' (69). We do not need to see the conclusion here, we already reasonably know, that at least the premises are contradictory. One premise might be true, but not both. A valid argument can have a false premise. (69). As long as the premise (s) are not true and the conclusion false, it is logically possible to have a valid argument. 

Premise-Conclusion

TT, FF, FT, TF 

A true premise (s) and false conclusion (TF) from these combinations, cannot possibly be logically valid. However, as Pire recognizes, a sound (true) argument has all true premises. (69). It has a true conclusion. 

The classic 'the moon is made of green cheese' (69), is documented as a valid premise, but not a premise in a sound (true) argument. It is not reasonable from empirical, scientific evidence that the moon is made of green cheese, but it is not an illogical premise as such. 

I have suggested to my friends that in arguments, when one disagrees with the conclusion, deny a premise first, if that can be reasonably, truthfully done. This pulls the carpet. It prohibits one from being dragged into accepting a questionable conclusion after hastily accepting premises and then having to philosophically backtrack... 

Here is a common, paraphrased, psychological, motivational, premise and conclusion.

Premise

You are the main creator of your life.

Conclusion

Therefore, if it is going to be, it is up to you.
---

I deny the premise and pull the carpet, by stating:

God is infinite.

God is necessary.

God is the primary cause of all things.

A human being is finite.

A human being is contingent (dependent on what is necessary as the sufficient cause).

A human being is a secondary cause (of some things).
---

I also deny the conclusion, simultaneously. If it is going to be, it is secondarily up to you.


Cited 

Confusion of Necessary with a Sufficient Condition 

A causal fallacy you commit this fallacy when you assume that a necessary condition of an event is sufficient for the event to occur. A necessary condition is a condition that must be present for an event to occur. A sufficient condition is a condition or set of conditions that will produce the event. A necessary condition must be there, but it alone does not provide sufficient cause for the occurrence of the event. Only the sufficient grounds can do this. In other words, all of the necessary elements must be there. 

Cited 

I don't know why the car won't run; I just filled the gas tank. 

A sufficient condition is a condition or set of conditions that will produce the event.

The vehicle needs to be started too. A missing premise.

I reason that as God is the necessary cause of all things, directly or indirectly, God is also the sufficient cause of all things. As a theistic philosopher of religion and theologian within the Reformed tradition, everything that occurs is caused by God, either directly willed, or indirectly willed, which could also be called, allowed.


Necessary versus Sufficient conditions

Philosopher Blackburn explains... 

'If p is a necessary condition of q, then q cannot be true unless p is true. If p is a sufficient condition of q, then given that p is true, q is so as well.' (73). Blackburn provides the example: Steering well is a necessary condition of driving well... (73). But it is not sufficient, as one can steer well, but be an overall bad driver. (73). Perhaps, one steers very well, but is overly occupied by texting while driving. (My add, and not my practice) 

This concept from Blackburn with the use of symbolic logic, provides a level of complexity, yet consistent and logical at the same time. But providing a true example provides another level of difficulty. 

A solid/true example

Infinite attributes (a) are a necessary condition of infinite nature (b). 

Infinite attributes (a) are a necessary condition of infinite nature (b), then infinite nature (b) cannot be true unless infinite attributes (a) are true. If infinite attributes (a) are a sufficient condition of infinite nature (b), then given that infinite attributes (a) are true, then infinite nature (b) is so as well. 

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

LANGER, SUSANNE K (1953)(1967) An Introduction to Symbolic Logic, Dover Publications, New York.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London. 

Sunday, February 27, 2022

Nice message on LinkedIn

Photo: Google maps, edited by me for privacy considerations. Close to the first house I lived in as a baby/toddler. Port Coquitlam.

The article being referenced:


I appreciate the kind words. 

(Six minute read? I am thrilled to see that)