Thursday, April 22, 2021

Ephesians 2: Works for our neighbour



Photo: facebook_1609984278058_6752763497396676987 Mirabel Vineyards, Kelowna 

Ephesians 2: Works for our neighbour

Ephesians 2: 8-10 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

8 For by grace you have been saved through faith; and [l]this is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; 9 not a result of works, so that no one may boast. 10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

1) Ephesians 2:8 I.e., this salvation

At roughly the 3:30 mark, I am in basic agreement with Pastor Courson. In regeneration (John 3, being born again from God, Titus 3) the believer is saved by grace through faith, in the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ; not by good human works, and never by good human works, but for good human works in Jesus Christ, in salvation.

Paraphrased at roughly the 4:00 mark forward, it is explained that God does not need our works, but our neighbour needs our works. I agree. Proper thoughts and action (s) toward others is something to seek prayerfully.

Further, to be clear theologically, human works cannot save, justify or sanctify, anyone. Clearly within the New Testament, salvation with justification, the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ, and sanctification is from God. But the Christian can and should embrace these in salvation.

In his commentary series Pastor Courson writes that 'Paul says specifically that even the faith it took to be saved is not of ourselves.' (1234). He further notes that dead men do not have faith. (1234). This is spiritual deadness and indeed the unregenerate are actually at odds with God. 

Romans 5: 10  New American Standard Bible (NASB)

10 For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved [a]by His life. Read full chapter Footnotes Romans 5:10 Or in

Pastor Courson references Romans 3 where that 'there is none that seeks after God, no not one (Romans 3: 11) (1234). Salvation is totally based on God's grace. (1235). Romans 3: 11 also explains that no human being is righteous and in Romans 3: 12, it is explained that no one does good. 

This is not a theology of maximal evil within humanity (within total depravity), but is rather explaining that humanity is tainted within its fallen, sinful nature and ontologically (nature and existence) separated from God. The regeneration of a persons in Jesus Christ, in salvation, imputes the righteousness of Christ and applies sanctification, towards ultimate resurrection within the eventually culminated Kingdom of God (1 Corinthians 15, Revelation 20-22) minus any human taint.

Monday, April 30, 2018: Repentance 

Edited from website archives

James 2:24 24 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone. 

The justification discussed in James is a justification of works, as in a sign on true regeneration and faith is works. Someone that is not regenerated will not have the works mentioned in both James 2 and Ephesians 2: 10. Barclay reasons that Paul and James are not in disagreement. (79). Faith and deeds are not opposites, they are inseparable. (79). Someone must be moved to faith by God, and that faith will demonstrate works for God.

Blue Letter Bible 

Cited

παλιγγενεσία 

Transliteration

palingenesia 

Definition new birth, reproduction, renewal, recreation, regeneration 

Cited 

Strong’s Definitions

παλιγγενεσία palingenesía, pal-ing-ghen-es-ee'-ah; from G3825 and G1078; (spiritual) rebirth (the state or the act), i.e. (figuratively) spiritual renovation; specially, Messianic restoration:—regeneration. 

Thayer's Greek Lexicon 

Matthew 19:28 is seemingly, primarily, in the context of messianic restoration. 

Cited 

in the new age or world... 

Titus 3: 5 is in the context of spiritual, human regeneration from God. 

Cited 

moral renovation, regeneration, the production of a new life consecrated to God... 

BARCLAY, WILLIAM (1976) The Letters of James and Peter, Philadelphia, The Westminster Press. 

BRUCE, F.F. (1987) Romans, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville.

CRANFIELD, C.E.B. (1992) Romans: A Shorter Commentary, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

DUNN, JAMES D.G. (1988) Romans, Dallas, Word Books.

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1995) The New American Commentary: Romans, Nashville, Broadman & Holman Publishers.

STRONG, J. (1890)(1986) Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Burlington, Welch Publishing Company.

Wednesday, April 21, 2021

PhD: Twitter quote 72

PhD: Twitter quote 72

Zoom last Saturday: JCZ photo

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter
 

Twitter version I

Jonathan Edwards (1729)(2006) writes that God has the power to bestow upon anyone of his creatures good, evil, or indifference for the greater good. Edwards (1729)(2006: 414). 

Twitter version II

Edited from PhD

This sovereign divine control is accepted despite the obvious problem of evil occurring in God’s creation. Edwards (1729)(2006: 414). 

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1729)(2006) Sovereignty of God, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University. http://edwards.yale.edu/archive/documents/page?document_id=10817&search_id=&source_type=edited&pagenumber=1 

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1731-1733)(2006) Law of Nature, New Haven, Connecticut, Jonathan Edwards Center, Yale University. 

EDWARDS, JONATHAN (1754)(2006) Freedom of the Will, Flower Mound, Texas. Jonathanedwards.com. 


My photo below, same Zoom event. I think this is Sir Robin explaining...

Arne looks like he is holding back telling a joke.


Monday, April 19, 2021

Getting rid of Religious Studies?

Getting rid of Religious Studies?

Photo: Loniest house in the world - Elliðaey island, Iceland. Facebook 150421 


Preface

This interesting American article above arrived on my Google News feed, last week.

Cited article portions

My comments not in italics

As universities reopened this past fall, the educational landscape was significantly altered by the Covid-19 pandemic.

In my humble opinion, since I started my academic trek in 1991, the amount of work available in my related academic fields has shrunk. I am content doing research, writing, editing and revising within the same disciplines on this website and Satire Und Theology, assisting at church, and having other sources of income.

Cited 

Canisius College in Buffalo, N.Y., for instance, responded to its $20 million deficit with layoffs, salary cuts and the elimination of nine majors. Though Canisius is a 150-year-old Jesuit school, its eliminations included the religious studies major.

No shock. The financial feasibility of academic programs is very relevant. I accept that...

Cited 

Canisius is not alone in this decision. Elmira College, Hiram College and Connecticut College have either eliminated or expect to eliminate their religious studies programs.

Cited 

Religion and, more specifically, Christianity is not only expendable at universities but often actively excluded. From my personal experience in graduate school at the University of Chicago, professors derided religion, students readily signaled their lack of religious views, and I received surprised looks when I shared my Catholic faith. It was as though the study of English literature and Catholicism were incompatible.

Many within general western societies and within western academia, seemingly place little or no value on the academic disciplines within Religious Studies. To some extent, theistic Philosophy of Religion under the umbrella of Philosophy, may also be deemed less important than many academic fields.

Within Religious Studies and theistic Philosophy of Religion, there are often worldview tensions with aspects of modern secular views.

Cited 

Christianity built upon this philosophy to develop the ethic that dominated Western thought for centuries. Thinkers like St. Thomas Aquinas, St. Anselm of Canterbury and St. Thomas More continued the Catholic intellectual tradition. Their writings shaped philosophy, politics and literature. During a time when the vast majority of the population was illiterate, Catholic monks and members of the clergy were the European literati.

I make uses of these types of sources in my MPhil and PhD theses work.


Cited 

Many hold the assumption that one cannot be religious and intellectual.

This is likely reasoned by many without significant academic training in Biblical Studies, Theology and Philosophy of Religion. Please see my archives for numerous related articles...

I did have to reference some scientific journals and philosophical sources that dealt with scientific issues for my PhD.

Archives: science 

As an intellectual, academic accuracy requires that I intentionally take evidences from numerous academic disciplines objectively. Bias exists but it must be checked by reason, evidence and facts. 

Cited 

Enlightenment bolstered the notion that a religious setting was no longer the best place for intellectual inquiry. Even those who invoked God to substantiate the rights of individuals (including some of the founding fathers of the United States) saw God more as a detached creator than the Christian God. Thus, in academic and intellectual circles, religion continued to wane in importance.

While religion enjoyed a meager presence among Enlightenment intellectuals, late 19th and early 20th-century philosophers often completely excluded it. These philosophies, not coincidentally, were the most iconoclastic; they were devoted to undermining institutions. Karl Marx, for instance, called religion the “opium of the people.” There would be no place for religion, the nation-state or other traditional institutions in a communist social system. 

Today’s public intellectuals are a product of movements and philosophies, including the Enlightenment, nihilism and post-structuralism. As provocateurs who question every assumption from ethics to politics, many public intellectuals act as if institution-probing were their job description. For many contemporary scholars, institutions like marriage, the mainstream media, capitalism and, yes, organized religion are not to be trusted. Their probing of institutions, however, has gone so far that it is leading to their unraveling.

Cited 

The Enlightenment bolstered the notion that a religious setting was no longer the best place for intellectual inquiry.

I have written on the enlightenment...


Cited

I have noted previously edited from my MPhil...

Enlightenment era thinking, which is still prominent in liberal circles today, believes that humanity has the ability to reason out who God is, whereas traditional Christianity believes that God must reveal himself in order for human beings to come to some understanding of who he is. 

So the Enlightenment places greater emphasis on the human mind comprehending God, whereas traditional Christianity puts emphasis on Scripture inspired by God, which must teach human beings about God. 

Two problems come to mind concerning the human mind’s ability to know God.

First, the human mind is finite, God is infinite. It could be said that human beings could only understand God in a limited way. This is not to say that the limited human understanding was in error or without logic, but simply limited. For this reason, I think in this relationship God would have to take the initiative in presenting himself to humanity for greater understanding, and this would lead to revelation. 

Second, I believe there is significant evidence in Scripture and everyday life, that humanity is imperfect and sinful, and in a spiritual condition where they would have to be transformed in order to have a relationship with God. I am not saying that human beings cannot understand things about God without revelation, but I am stating that revelation is required for a changed spirit which could lead to a relationship with God. I, therefore, do not think that human reason outside of revelation should be our final authority in theology. 

Science: the New Religion 

Instead, in many circles, science has become the hallowed institution that will solve all problems (even moral ones). Though the vast majority of Christians embrace the study of science, a number of prominent scientists see Christianity as inimical to rational, scientific approaches to thinking. Steven Pinker, a psychologist and author of Enlightenment Now and The Better Angels of Our Nature, warns against relying on “dogma” rather than trusting science to fill in the gaps of human understanding.

Cited

A number of prominent scientists see Christianity as inimical to rational, scientific approaches to thinking.

Cited 

Signaling a lack of religious views can be about more than just fitting in with fellow students and faculty; it can also be a way of avoiding ridicule.

Cited 

But the bravery of students and faculty members is what will keep religious studies off the chopping block when times are tough. It is what will make intellectuals sit on a stage and express not lukewarm approval but exuberance for the possibilities of religion in scholarship.

There is a danger of scientism, which I have written on in articles:

Archives: scientism 

Blackburn 

Scientism: A pejorative term for the concept that only the methods of natural science and related categories form the elements for any philosophical or other enquiry. Blackburn (1996: 344). 

From Oxford Dictionary Scientism: 1 a a method or doctrine regarded as characteristic of scientists b the use of practice of this. 2 often derogatory, an excessive belief in or application of scientific method. Oxford (1995: 1236). 

A person holding to scientism may abandon the need for a contextual evaluation within Biblical Studies and the related academic research within Theology and Philosophy of Religion; instead embracing scientific explanations alone. 

As a moderate conservative Christian of Reformed and Anabaptist traditions, I reason there is a need for openness to scientific truths, as in being open to inductive scientific evidences and the use of empiricism. For the sake of a reasonable, balanced academic approach, the entirety of worldview should be never be reasoned and accepted, at the expenses of  considering reasonable, deduced, premises and conclusions within Religious Studies and Philosophy of Religion which also does produce truths.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BROWN, C. (1996) The Enlightenment, in Walter A. Elwell (ed.), Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books. 

McGRATH, A. (1992) Bridge-Building, Leicester, Inter-Varsity Press. 

McGRATH, A. (1992) Suffering, London, Hodder and Stoughton Limited. 

PAILIN, D.A. (1999) Enlightenment, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Limited.

OXFORD DICTIONARY OF SCIENCE (2010) Oxford, Oxford University Press.

THE CONCISE OXFORD DICTIONARY (1995) Della Thompson (ed.), Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Wednesday, April 14, 2021

The Orthodox Study Bible: Jude Preface

The Orthodox Study Bible: Jude Preface

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

Author

The Orthodox text documents that Jude was the brother of Jesus (Mathew 13: 55 and Mark 6: 3) and was a relative of Jesus Christ. (583). Jude is considered the author of the Epistle of Jude. (583). Jude is the brother of James, the author of James, and this is not the same James that was one of the twelve apostles.(583). In other words, not James the brother of John.

Book of Jude commenter David F. Payne explains that there is a traditional view, widely held, that Jude was the brother of James, both sons of Mary and Joseph, therefore half-brother of Jesus Christ. Payne (1986: 1590). 

Date

The text states that 60-80 AD seems reasonable. (583). Many scholars, reason the text was written in the 60s or 70s AD. Payne states 70s to 80s AD for the date of writing. Payne (1986: 1590). Payne reasons that the free use of  a non-canonical text (such as Enoch) points to a first-century date. Payne (1986: 1590). Robert Gundry, lists the date as 60s or 70s A.D. (1981: 364).

It is opined that oral tradition has already established basic doctrines in the Church (verse 3). (583). 

Jude verse 3: New American Standard Bible (NASB)

3 Beloved, while I was making every effort to write you about our common salvation, I felt the necessity to write to you appealing that you contend earnestly for the faith that was once for all time handed down to the [a]saints.  Footnotes a) Jude 1:3 Lit holy ones; i.e., God’s people

The teaching of the Apostles is described as being in the past, verses 17-18). (583).

Jude verses 17-18 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

17 But you, beloved, ought to remember the words that were spoken beforehand by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, 18 that they were saying to you, “In the last time there will be mockers, following after their own ungodly lusts.”

Major Theme

The text explains that the Book of Jude 'is a polemic directed against false teachers within the Church.' (583). The theme is similar to that of 2 Peter. (583). The text was designed to counter particular heretical theologies and philosophical views that arose in the Church. Payne (1986: 1590). 

Background Information

In regards to the canonicity, the text states that Jude was not accepted as Scripture by some  as it refers to pseudepigraphal books, such as the Book of Enoch. (583). But this practice is not ruled out in a New Testament context. The Book of Jude was eventually accepted as canonical due to its antiquity and because the text was respected within the Church. (583).

Gnosticism

The heresy may have been gnosticism. (583). This religious system valued the immaterial and rejected the material. (583). This is an unbiblical philosophy. 

Antinomianism was one manifestation and was connected to Gnostic thought. Matter was viewed as evil and in contrast, all spiritual was considered good. Payne (1986: 1590). Payne states that this led to cultivated spiritual lives and misdeeds of the physical nature. Payne (1986: 1590). 

R. MCL. Wilson states gnosticism describes an early religious movement that placed special emphasis upon knowledge (Greek: gnosis) (γνῶσις, my add) of God and the nature and eventual destiny of humanity. Knowledge was needed to liberate the soul from cosmic forces. Wilson (1999: 226). Wilson in ‘Gnosticism’ notes it is the term used to describe a religious movement that existed during the early Christian era. The gnosis was considered a special knowledge of God and the nature of humanity. This gnosis would provide a person with the power to be free from negative cosmic forces. Wilson (1999: 226). Klein, Blomberg, and Hubbard explain that although gnosticism existed in the first century it did not become a full-fledged philosophy until the second and third centuries. Klein, Blomberg, and Hubbard (1993: 382).

Gnosis from the Greek meaning knowledge. The root word is found in the words/concepts agnosticism, gnosticism, diagnosis, prognosis and the obsolete word for epistemology, gnoseology. Blackburn (1996: 159). In the academic discipline of theology, gnosis is noted by Blackburn to be considered higher knowledge of spiritual things, referencing claims of such knowledge within gnosticism. Blackburn (1996: 159). 

Browning writes that gnosis, meaning knowledge, and gnosticism is a term used for 'a kind of religious speculation in vogue in the first two centuries CE'; the Church Fathers being hostile to it because of a perceived opposition to orthodox (Biblical my add) Christianity. Browning (1997: 151). Gnosticism was a broad movement that did have influence over the Church, particularly in the second century states Grenz, Guretzki and Nordling; I John may, for example be attempting to answer and refute gnostic understandings. Pocket Dictionary (1999: 56). Gnosticism would emphasize the spiritual realm over the material realm which was considered evil, often claiming it needed to be escaped. Pocket Dictionary (1999: 56).



γνῶσις, εως, ἡ (Strong: 1108)

Cited 

gnósis: a knowing, knowledge 

Original Word: γνῶσις, εως, ἡ

Brief comments

For me, gnosticism is obviously, biblically, theologically and philosophically false. Angelic spiritual entities have been corrupted by rebellion against God (Genesis 3, the serpent, Satan, also Revelation 12: 9). Fallen angels, not material entities, fell before humanity did, which is both body and spirit.

Revelation 12:9 New American Standard Bible (NASB)

9 And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole [a]world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him. Footnotes Revelation 12:9 Lit inhabited earth

Within the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ, regenerated, believing (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter) humanity in spiritual, material, wholeness, is sanctified, perfected and resurrected (1 Corinthians 15) within the eventual culminated Kingdom of God (2 Peter 3, Revelation 20-22).

BARCLAY, WILLIAM (1976) The Letters of James and Peter, Philadelphia, The Westminster Press.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville. 

ELWELL, WALTER AND YARBROUGH, ROBERT W., Third Edition (2013) Encountering The New Testament, Grand Rapids, Baker Academic.

FEE, GORDON D. (1987) The First Epistle To The Corinthians, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring The New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books.

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press.

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

HOCKING, DAVID (2014) The Book of Revelation, Tustin, California, HFT Publications. 

KLEIN, WILLIAM W., CRAIG, C. BLOMBERG, AND ROBERT L. HUBBARD, JR. (1993) Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, London, Word Publishing. 

MARSH, PAUL, W. (1986) ‘1 Corinthians’, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

MARSHALL, ALFRED (1975)(1996) The Interlinear KJV-NIV, Grand Rapids, Zondervan. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

ORR, R.W. (1986) 'The Letters of John' in The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

PAYNE. DAVID F.(1986) Jude, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

PAYNE. DAVID F.(1986) ‘2 Peter’, in F.F. Bruce, (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Marshall Pickering/Zondervan.

WILSON, R. MCL (1999) ‘Gnosticism’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd.