Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Eastern Orthodox Church


Angara River, Russia (photo from trekearth.com)

For my PhD dissertation research I have had contact with a couple of Orthodox priests. I am not very familiar with the Eastern Orthodox Church. I am adopted and according to a piece of paper given to my adoptive parents and now in my possession, my biological paternal family was Roman Catholic, and my biological maternal family was Eastern Orthodox. I end up being a Presbyterian. The term Orthodox or Orthodoxy is defined within Christianity as meaning a right belief, as opposed to heresy. Grenz, Guretzki, and Nordling (1999: 87). The terms are used in a narrower sense to describe the Eastern Orthodox tradition. Grenz, Guretzki and Nordling. (1999: 88).

P.D. Steeves explains that the theological dimension of the 1054 schism between the Western Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church had to primarily do with the East's rejection of papal authority. Steeves (1996: 805). The Eastern Church viewed the papacy as having honour, but saw all bishops with correct teaching as being equally successors to Peter. Steeves (1996: 805). Earle E. Cairns writes that another difference between the two churches was that in the East marriage was allowed for those in the clergy below the rank of bishop. In the West clergy were not allowed to marry. Cairns (1981: 203). The West and East disagreed in 867 on the filioque (and from the Son in Latin) clause inserted in the Nicene Creed as the West accepted the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son, but this was rejected by the East. Cairns (1981: 205). Although Eastern Orthodoxy holds to the Trinity it disagreed with the idea of two originating principles within the Godhead as the Holy Spirit would proceed from the Father and Son, and not just the Father. Steeves (1996: 805). Many Eastern Orthodox thinkers could accept a formulation where the Holy Spirit proceeds through the Father, or with the Son. Steeves (1996: 805).

From my perspective, within the New Testament it is very debatable to state that Peter was an apostle that had more authority than any other, in particular in light of the fact that Paul most certainly wrote more New Testament books and was a more important theological figure. Concerning marriage, Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 7:7 that he wished all men could be like him and he admits that not all have his gift which seemingly means in context, celibacy and contentment being single. I do not see any Biblical command that all ministers of the gospel should be single. With the issue of the Trinity, Erickson explains that the Holy Spirit does subordinate himself to the Son's ministry, but this does not make him less equal as God. Erickson (1994: 338). In John 20: 22-23, Jesus had his disciples receive the Holy Spirit for their ministry. It could be in a sense stated here that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son, under the Father's authority.

CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.

ERICKSON, MILLARD. (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

GRENZ, STANLEY J. DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press.

STEEVES, P.D. (1996) 'Orthodox Tradition, The' in Walter A. Elwell (ed.), Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.

According to:

http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/denominations/orthodoxy.htm

The denomination now known as Orthodox Christianity, Eastern Orthodoxy, or the Orthodox Church began as the eastern half of Christendom, the site of the former Byzantine Empire.

Today, the highest concentration of Orthodox Christians remains in this area as well as in Russia, although Orthodoxy can be found in countries throughout the world. Approximately 225 million people worldwide are Orthodox Christians.

History of Orthodoxy

Eastern Orthodoxy as a distinct branch of Christianity arose as a result of the first major divide in Christendom occurred in the 11th century with the "Great Schism" between East and West. The separation was not sudden or unexpected, however. For centuries there had been significant religious, cultural, and political differences between the Eastern and Western churches. Religiously, the two regions had different views on topics such as the use of images (icons), the nature of the Holy Spirit, and the date on which Easter should be celebrated.

Culturally, the Greek East has always tended to be more philosophical, abstract and mystical in its thinking, whereas the Latin West tends toward a more pragmatic and legal-minded approach. (According to an old saying, "the Greeks built metaphysical systems; the Romans built roads.")

The political aspects of the split date back to the Emperor Constantine, who moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Constantinople. Upon his death, the empire was divided between his two sons, one of whom ruled the western half of the empire from Rome while the other ruled the eastern region from Constantinople.

These various factors finally came to a head in 1054 AD, when Pope Leo IX excommunicated the patriarch of Constantinople (the leader of the Eastern church). In response, the patriarch anathematized (condemned) the Pope, and the Christian church has been divided into West ("Roman Catholic") and East ("Greek Orthodox") ever since. A glimmer of hope for reconciliation came at the onset of the Crusades later that century, when the West came to the aid of the East against the Turks. But especially after the Fourth Crusade (1200-1204), in which crusaders sacked and occupied Constantinople, the only result was an increase in hostility between the two churches.

However, attempts at reconciliation have been renewed in recent years. In 1964, the Second Vatican Council issued this statement praising its Eastern counterparts:

The Catholic Church values highly the institutions of the Eastern Churches, their liturgical rites, ecclesiastical traditions, and their ordering of Christian life. For in those churches, which are distinguished by their venerable antiquity, there is clearly evident the tradition which has come from the Apostles through the Fathers and which is part of the divinely revealed, undivided heritage of the Universal Church. {2}

On December 7, 1965, the mutual excommunication of 1054 was officially removed by Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras.

Organization and Religious Authority

The Orthodox Church is organized into several regional, autocephalous (governed by their own head bishops) churches. The Patriarch of Constantinople has the honor of primacy, but does not carry the same authority as the Pope does in Catholicism. Major Orthodox churches include the Greek Orthodox Church, the Russian Orthodox Church, the Romanian Orthodox Church, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the Church of Alexandria, the Church of Jerusalem, and the Orthodox Church in America.

The religious authority for Orthodox Christianity is not the Pope as in Catholicism, nor the individual Christian with his Bible as in Protestantism, but the scriptures as interpreted by the seven ecumenical councils of the church.

Orthodoxy also relies heavily on the writings of early Greek fathers such as Gregory of Nyssa, John Chrysostom and St. Basil the Great. Although some Orthodox confessions of faith were produced in the 17th century as counterparts to those of the Reformation, these are regarded as having only historical significance.

Distinctive Orthodox Beliefs

As in all of Christianity, doctrine is important in Eastern Orthodoxy. Orthodox Christians attach great importance to the Bible, the conclusions of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, and right ("orthodox") belief. However, the Eastern Churches approach religious truth differently than the Western Churches. For Orthodox Christians, truth must be experienced personally. There is thus less focus on the exact definition of religious truth and more on the practical and personal experience of truth in the life of the individual and the church. Precise theological definition, when it occurs, is primarily for the purpose of excluding error.

This emphasis on personal experience of truth flows into Orthodox theology, which has a rich heritage. Especially in the first millenium of Christian history, the Eastern Church has produced significant theological and philosophical thought.

In the Western churches, both Catholic and Protestant, sin, grace, and salvation are seen primarily in legal terms. God gave humans freedom, they misused it and broke God's commandments, and now deserve punishment. God's grace results in forgiveness of the transgression and freedom from bondage and punishment.

The Eastern churches see the matter in a different way. For Orthodox theologians, humans were created in the image of God and made to participate fully in the divine life. The full communion with God that Adam and Eve enjoyed meant complete freedom and true humanity, for humans are most human when they are completely united with God.

The result of sin, then, was a blurring of the image of God and a barrier between God and man. The situation in which mankind has been ever since is an unnatural, less human state, which ends in the most unnatural aspect: death. Salvation, then, is a process not of justification or legal pardon, but of reestablishing man's communion with God. This process of repairing the unity of human and divine is sometimes called "deification." This term does not mean that humans become gods but that humans join fully with God's divine life.

The Eastern Orthodox view of the Trinity also differs somewhat from that of the Christian West. In its Christology, Orthodoxy tends to emphasize the divine, preexistent nature of Christ, whereas the West focuses more on his human nature. However, both East and West affirm Christ's full humanity and full divinity as defined by the ecumenical councils. In fact, Christ's humanity is also central to Orthodox faith, in that the divine became human so that humanity might be raised up to the divine life.

The process of being reunited to God, made possible by Christ, is accomplished by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit plays a central role in Orthodox worship: the liturgy usually begins with a prayer to the Spirit and invocations made prior to sacraments are addressed to the Spirit.

It is in the view of the Holy Spirit that Orthodox theology differs from Western theology, and although the difference can seem rather techinical and abstract, it was a major contributor to the parting of East from West in the 11th century. This dispute is known as the Filioque Controversy, as it centers on the Latin word filioque ("and from the Son"), which was added to the Nicene Creed in Spain in the 6th century. The original creed proclaimed only that the Holy Spirit "proceeds from the Father." The purpose of the addition was to reaffirm the divinity of the Son, but Eastern theologians objected both to the unilateral editing of a creed produced by an ecumenical council and to the edit itself. For Eastern Christians, both the Spirit and the Son have their origin in the Father.

Orthodox Worship and Religious Practices

Orthodox worship is highly liturgical and is central to the history and life of the church:

By its theological richness, spiritual significance, and variety, the worship of the Orthodox Church represents one of the most significant factors in this church's continuity and identity. It helps to account for the survival of Christianity during the many centuries of Muslim rule in the Middle East and the Balkans when the liturgy was the only source of religious knowledge or experience. {1}

References

"Eastern Orthodoxy." Encyclopædia Britannica (Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service, 2004).
Second Vatican Council, Decree on the Catholic Eastern Churches, 1964.


Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Questionnaire feedback two


Conwy, Wales (photo from thekingpin68)

1. I presently have 106 questionnaires in and thanks to all participants! I would like to have closer to 200 in and so anyone interested please feel to contact me.

2. A continual comment I am receiving is that the questions do not have context. I mentioned the following in the previous article:

Some church attendees have mentioned that questions can be answered in a variety of ways. A reason for this is that without the academic context of the theoretical work to review it is not always simple to know what is meant by the survey questions. On the other hand the questions are basic enough to provide a theological understanding to provide legitimate results.

I realized when putting the questionnaire together that only my advisor and I would understand to any great degree the full context of some of the questions. This cannot be avoided as only my advisor and I will be thoroughly familiar with all my theoretical work. I am not an expert on empirical and social research methods, but within the questionnaire I am using closed questions with a Likert scale. By closed questions these are ones that are provided with a set of fixed alternatives from which to choose. Bryman (2004: 145). Open questions in contrast would allow persons to respond in any way they choose. Bryman (2004: 145). I am required to use closed questions within this format and need to use the Likert scale. The Likert scale was named after Renis Likert and is a multiple-indicator or item measure of a set of attitudes relating to a particular area or topic. Bryman (2004: 68). The goal of the Likert scale is to measure the intensity of feelings about the area or topic in question. Bryman (2004: 68). Usually each respondent is asked to indicate his/her level of agreement or disagreement with statements or items and the format is often the five point scale. Bryman (2004: 68). The scale ranges from agree strongly to disagree strongly and also provides an option such as not certain. Bryman (2004: 68). It is important that the items are statements and not questions. Bryman (2004: 68).

3. When these problem of evil questions are completed and the results examined I shall have produced empirical theology which is under the broad umbrella of practical theology. Professor Leslie J. Francis and the Practical Theology Team of the University of Wales, Bangor, writes that an element of practical theology is the use of empirical data. In this sense, empirical theology is a way of doing practical theology. Francis (2005: 1). Don Browning writes within ‘Practical Theology and Political Theology’ from Theology Today that practical theology should be a public enterprise that consists of theological reflection on church ministry in the world and should also deal with the theology of professional ministerial activity within the church. Browning (1985)(2005). The empirical results are to supplement philosophical ones found by researching and writing the theoretical work.

4. The questionnaire respondent therefore has an excellent opportunity to help produce a type of theology, even without being a theologian. I have Protestant, Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Anabaptist and non-denominational Christians participating and it is an interesting opportunity to take part in a unique project.

5. As noted in the previous article, in order to provide some context before filling out the questionnaire one can read the short article linked below in which I reviewed five of the main texts I used for the theoretical work. One could also scan other writings on this blog concerning the problem of evil, free will and determinism.

http://thekingpin68.blogspot.com/2007/01/five-influential-books-on-problem-of.html

Thanks.

Russ

BROWNING DON S. (1985)(2005) ‘Practical Theology and Political Theology’, Theology Today, Volume 42, Number 1, Article 2, Princeton, Princeton Theological Seminary.
http://theologytoday.ptsem.edu/apr1985/v42-1-article2.htm.

BRYMAN, ALAN (2004) Social Research Methods, Oxford, University Press.

FRANCIS, LESLIE J. and Practical Theology Team (2005) ‘Practical and Empirical Theology’, University of Wales, Bangor website, University of Wales, Bangor.
http://www.bangor.ac.uk/rs/pt/ptunit/definition.php.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Questionnaire feedback


Reykjavik, Iceland (photo from trekearth.com)

Update: A person has placed my satire and theology blog on a list of atheist blogs. Someone don't know me very well, do they?

http://satireandtheology.blogspot.com/2007/03/this-is-classic.html

Greetings,

The start of another work week and I wish to share a little of the feedback I have received concerning the problem of evil questionnaires I am issuing. I have received 74 surveys back so far and the overall feedback has been positive. I would like between 100-200 completed questionnaires in my possession eventually.

1. Several church attendees have mentioned to me that the questionnaire helped them think about important issues related to evil but was not too long or difficult to complete. They also appreciated the anonymous nature of the survey as no name is required. The questionnaires can be returned by mail with no return address. A previous advisor at Wales informed me that perhaps no one, especially in North America has taken complex theodicy questions and put them in a questionnaire form at a PhD level, although I have done it at a MPhil level previously. I am not an expert at empirical theology and so the positive feedback is encouraging.

2. Some church attendees have mentioned that questions can be answered in a variety of ways. A reason for this is that without the academic context of the theoretical work to review it is not always simple to know what is meant by the survey questions. On the other hand the questions are basic enough to provide a theological understanding to provide legitimate results.

3. A person mentioned that the questionnaire seemed biased. I admit that my written work like all written work comes with bias. I ask the Lord for guidance with my work and depend on the Bible for understanding where applicable. It must be stated that the questions on the questionnaire are not biased in a strong way towards any particular world-view because they are taken from the writings of five different writers. These exemplars are Augustine, Plantinga, Feinberg, Hick, and Gebara. The actual problem of evil questions are therefore representative of five different perspectives and are not simply put together by myself or a committee. Within the questionnaire there are other standard type survey questions concerning the nature of God and sociological questions which my previous advisor helped me place in the questionnaire. If certain concepts related to the problem of evil are missing from the questionnaire it is likely because the ideas were not covered by the writers I reviewed. The survey questions represent views from the theological left and right and in between. The previous blog article below is a review of some main texts I used from the five writers and will provide a brief and basic description of viewpoints expressed by these writers.

http://thekingpin68.blogspot.com/2007/01/five-influential-books-on-problem-of.html

4. A person informed me that a Methodist congregation did not assist me with the questionnaires because Methodists were private people. I answered back that I had received twenty surveys from Methodists that same week! There was no response to my comment.

5. Some questionnaires supposedly went missing, but have since returned.;)

http://satireandtheology.blogspot.com/2007/03/stolen-questionnaires.html

Thank You.

Russ:)

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Near Death Experiences


Poze Islanda, Iceland (photo from trekearth.com)

Greetings,

The link below is from a discussion I commented in from a blog of someone well studied in the Reformed philosophy and free will. I am not sure I was completely understood and blog comments cannot be revised like blog articles as they are done with less preparation. Yes, I reserve the right to revise these blog articles!

http://reformedapologist.blogspot.com/2007/02/oliphint-on-free-will.html

For the sake of clarity the following is a portion of what I wrote concerning my free will theory in my Edwards article on this blog:

http://thekingpin68.blogspot.com/2006/08/jonathan-edwards-and-libertarian-free.html

Human nature and consciousness does not choose to be as it is, but was created by God, and has been corrupt since the fall of humanity. From consciousness and self-awareness, human beings would develop motives and desires, and eventually make limited free will choices. The primary cause of human acts is determined by God who creates the human nature, and influences human choices. The secondary cause of human acts is the individuals that act according to nature, consciousness, motives, desires, and a limited free will influenced by God.

It may be correctly pointed out that what God determines and causes must necessarily (logically must occur) take place. However, I do not think that God coerces or forces individuals to commit actions. Some Calvinists suggest that human beings are not free in any respect, but have liberty to follow their motives and desires. A problem with the use of the term liberty, although I am in agreement with the basic theological concept, is that it is often academically defined as autonomy and/or freedom of choice, therefore confusing the issue for some not familiar with Reformed theology. With my use of the terms compatibilistic free will or limited free will I hope to provide a concept of human freedom that is clearly understood to be different than libertarian free will.

Also concerning the above link it was mentioned by someone else that all schools of thought affirm the ability of one to choose within their human nature. That appears to be generally but not absolutely correct, and as noted I do affirm that persons make choices within their nature as a secondary cause while God is the primary cause. God does not coerce or force persons within the process, but uses all choices for the greater good. Simon Blackburn notes concerning libertarianism that some that hold to the concept are derided for desiring to protect the fantasy of an agent situated outside of the realm of nature altogether. Blackburn (1996: 218).

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) ‘Libertarianism', in Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, p. 218. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

The links below feature a radio debate on Near Death Experiences between resurrection scholar Dr. Garry Habermas and Keith Augustine, Executive Director, Internet Infidels. I have not studied Near Death Experiences so I provide these links for information purposes and do not endorse a position on the issue. However, the topic is interesting for those interested in spiritual matters and the hosts mention a bizarre case of a former atheist who claims to have become a Christian through a Near Death Experience.

http://www.garyhabermas.com/audio/ttmm_nde_pt1.mp3

http://www.garyhabermas.com/audio/ttmm_nde_pt2.mp3

http://www.garyhabermas.com/audio/ttmm_nde_pt3.mp3

Additional: An article on pacifism from a well known Christian blog and my comment.

http://trinitariandon.blogspot.com/2007/03/selfishness-of-pacifism.html

My comment, although it would be better for context to read his short article as well.

Hello Donald,

I scanned your article and think it is helpful. For my BA I attended a Mennonite institution which taught non-resistance. I am not opposed to the use of force by the state to maintain law and order against internal or external forces. One Mennonite professor stated that to be non-resistant meant avoiding war but also included the willingness to give one's life to save another if necessary. This is admirable but a reason that the state needs to at times use force to maintain law and order is to prohibit the death of persons. This sometimes requires the use of force and not just the sacrifice of one holding to non-resistance for another, since the sacrifice may only cause an additional death.

Russ:)