Wednesday, April 04, 2007
Eastern Orthodox Church
Angara River, Russia (photo from trekearth.com)
For my PhD dissertation research I have had contact with a couple of Orthodox priests. I am not very familiar with the Eastern Orthodox Church. I am adopted and according to a piece of paper given to my adoptive parents and now in my possession, my biological paternal family was Roman Catholic, and my biological maternal family was Eastern Orthodox. I end up being a Presbyterian. The term Orthodox or Orthodoxy is defined within Christianity as meaning a right belief, as opposed to heresy. Grenz, Guretzki, and Nordling (1999: 87). The terms are used in a narrower sense to describe the Eastern Orthodox tradition. Grenz, Guretzki and Nordling. (1999: 88).
P.D. Steeves explains that the theological dimension of the 1054 schism between the Western Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church had to primarily do with the East's rejection of papal authority. Steeves (1996: 805). The Eastern Church viewed the papacy as having honour, but saw all bishops with correct teaching as being equally successors to Peter. Steeves (1996: 805). Earle E. Cairns writes that another difference between the two churches was that in the East marriage was allowed for those in the clergy below the rank of bishop. In the West clergy were not allowed to marry. Cairns (1981: 203). The West and East disagreed in 867 on the filioque (and from the Son in Latin) clause inserted in the Nicene Creed as the West accepted the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son, but this was rejected by the East. Cairns (1981: 205). Although Eastern Orthodoxy holds to the Trinity it disagreed with the idea of two originating principles within the Godhead as the Holy Spirit would proceed from the Father and Son, and not just the Father. Steeves (1996: 805). Many Eastern Orthodox thinkers could accept a formulation where the Holy Spirit proceeds through the Father, or with the Son. Steeves (1996: 805).
From my perspective, within the New Testament it is very debatable to state that Peter was an apostle that had more authority than any other, in particular in light of the fact that Paul most certainly wrote more New Testament books and was a more important theological figure. Concerning marriage, Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 7:7 that he wished all men could be like him and he admits that not all have his gift which seemingly means in context, celibacy and contentment being single. I do not see any Biblical command that all ministers of the gospel should be single. With the issue of the Trinity, Erickson explains that the Holy Spirit does subordinate himself to the Son's ministry, but this does not make him less equal as God. Erickson (1994: 338). In John 20: 22-23, Jesus had his disciples receive the Holy Spirit for their ministry. It could be in a sense stated here that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son, under the Father's authority.
CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.
ERICKSON, MILLARD. (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.
GRENZ, STANLEY J. DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press.
STEEVES, P.D. (1996) 'Orthodox Tradition, The' in Walter A. Elwell (ed.), Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.
According to:
http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/denominations/orthodoxy.htm
The denomination now known as Orthodox Christianity, Eastern Orthodoxy, or the Orthodox Church began as the eastern half of Christendom, the site of the former Byzantine Empire.
Today, the highest concentration of Orthodox Christians remains in this area as well as in Russia, although Orthodoxy can be found in countries throughout the world. Approximately 225 million people worldwide are Orthodox Christians.
History of Orthodoxy
Eastern Orthodoxy as a distinct branch of Christianity arose as a result of the first major divide in Christendom occurred in the 11th century with the "Great Schism" between East and West. The separation was not sudden or unexpected, however. For centuries there had been significant religious, cultural, and political differences between the Eastern and Western churches. Religiously, the two regions had different views on topics such as the use of images (icons), the nature of the Holy Spirit, and the date on which Easter should be celebrated.
Culturally, the Greek East has always tended to be more philosophical, abstract and mystical in its thinking, whereas the Latin West tends toward a more pragmatic and legal-minded approach. (According to an old saying, "the Greeks built metaphysical systems; the Romans built roads.")
The political aspects of the split date back to the Emperor Constantine, who moved the capital of the Roman Empire from Rome to Constantinople. Upon his death, the empire was divided between his two sons, one of whom ruled the western half of the empire from Rome while the other ruled the eastern region from Constantinople.
These various factors finally came to a head in 1054 AD, when Pope Leo IX excommunicated the patriarch of Constantinople (the leader of the Eastern church). In response, the patriarch anathematized (condemned) the Pope, and the Christian church has been divided into West ("Roman Catholic") and East ("Greek Orthodox") ever since. A glimmer of hope for reconciliation came at the onset of the Crusades later that century, when the West came to the aid of the East against the Turks. But especially after the Fourth Crusade (1200-1204), in which crusaders sacked and occupied Constantinople, the only result was an increase in hostility between the two churches.
However, attempts at reconciliation have been renewed in recent years. In 1964, the Second Vatican Council issued this statement praising its Eastern counterparts:
The Catholic Church values highly the institutions of the Eastern Churches, their liturgical rites, ecclesiastical traditions, and their ordering of Christian life. For in those churches, which are distinguished by their venerable antiquity, there is clearly evident the tradition which has come from the Apostles through the Fathers and which is part of the divinely revealed, undivided heritage of the Universal Church. {2}
On December 7, 1965, the mutual excommunication of 1054 was officially removed by Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras.
Organization and Religious Authority
The Orthodox Church is organized into several regional, autocephalous (governed by their own head bishops) churches. The Patriarch of Constantinople has the honor of primacy, but does not carry the same authority as the Pope does in Catholicism. Major Orthodox churches include the Greek Orthodox Church, the Russian Orthodox Church, the Romanian Orthodox Church, the Bulgarian Orthodox Church, the Church of Alexandria, the Church of Jerusalem, and the Orthodox Church in America.
The religious authority for Orthodox Christianity is not the Pope as in Catholicism, nor the individual Christian with his Bible as in Protestantism, but the scriptures as interpreted by the seven ecumenical councils of the church.
Orthodoxy also relies heavily on the writings of early Greek fathers such as Gregory of Nyssa, John Chrysostom and St. Basil the Great. Although some Orthodox confessions of faith were produced in the 17th century as counterparts to those of the Reformation, these are regarded as having only historical significance.
Distinctive Orthodox Beliefs
As in all of Christianity, doctrine is important in Eastern Orthodoxy. Orthodox Christians attach great importance to the Bible, the conclusions of the Seven Ecumenical Councils, and right ("orthodox") belief. However, the Eastern Churches approach religious truth differently than the Western Churches. For Orthodox Christians, truth must be experienced personally. There is thus less focus on the exact definition of religious truth and more on the practical and personal experience of truth in the life of the individual and the church. Precise theological definition, when it occurs, is primarily for the purpose of excluding error.
This emphasis on personal experience of truth flows into Orthodox theology, which has a rich heritage. Especially in the first millenium of Christian history, the Eastern Church has produced significant theological and philosophical thought.
In the Western churches, both Catholic and Protestant, sin, grace, and salvation are seen primarily in legal terms. God gave humans freedom, they misused it and broke God's commandments, and now deserve punishment. God's grace results in forgiveness of the transgression and freedom from bondage and punishment.
The Eastern churches see the matter in a different way. For Orthodox theologians, humans were created in the image of God and made to participate fully in the divine life. The full communion with God that Adam and Eve enjoyed meant complete freedom and true humanity, for humans are most human when they are completely united with God.
The result of sin, then, was a blurring of the image of God and a barrier between God and man. The situation in which mankind has been ever since is an unnatural, less human state, which ends in the most unnatural aspect: death. Salvation, then, is a process not of justification or legal pardon, but of reestablishing man's communion with God. This process of repairing the unity of human and divine is sometimes called "deification." This term does not mean that humans become gods but that humans join fully with God's divine life.
The Eastern Orthodox view of the Trinity also differs somewhat from that of the Christian West. In its Christology, Orthodoxy tends to emphasize the divine, preexistent nature of Christ, whereas the West focuses more on his human nature. However, both East and West affirm Christ's full humanity and full divinity as defined by the ecumenical councils. In fact, Christ's humanity is also central to Orthodox faith, in that the divine became human so that humanity might be raised up to the divine life.
The process of being reunited to God, made possible by Christ, is accomplished by the Holy Spirit. The Spirit plays a central role in Orthodox worship: the liturgy usually begins with a prayer to the Spirit and invocations made prior to sacraments are addressed to the Spirit.
It is in the view of the Holy Spirit that Orthodox theology differs from Western theology, and although the difference can seem rather techinical and abstract, it was a major contributor to the parting of East from West in the 11th century. This dispute is known as the Filioque Controversy, as it centers on the Latin word filioque ("and from the Son"), which was added to the Nicene Creed in Spain in the 6th century. The original creed proclaimed only that the Holy Spirit "proceeds from the Father." The purpose of the addition was to reaffirm the divinity of the Son, but Eastern theologians objected both to the unilateral editing of a creed produced by an ecumenical council and to the edit itself. For Eastern Christians, both the Spirit and the Son have their origin in the Father.
Orthodox Worship and Religious Practices
Orthodox worship is highly liturgical and is central to the history and life of the church:
By its theological richness, spiritual significance, and variety, the worship of the Orthodox Church represents one of the most significant factors in this church's continuity and identity. It helps to account for the survival of Christianity during the many centuries of Muslim rule in the Middle East and the Balkans when the liturgy was the only source of religious knowledge or experience. {1}
References
"Eastern Orthodoxy." Encyclopædia Britannica (Encyclopædia Britannica Premium Service, 2004).
Second Vatican Council, Decree on the Catholic Eastern Churches, 1964.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I was supposed to meet with the Orthodox priest today, but was stuck in construction zones, got lost and arrived too late. I will attempt to attend a service this weekend.
ReplyDeleteMy impressions of the Divine Liturgy: http://kjsulli.blogspot.com/2005/12/smells-bells.html
ReplyDeleteI'm really leaving this comment because I'm interested in your questionnaire on the problem of evil.
Thanks Kyle.
ReplyDeleteI tried to email you via your email address. If that does not work please email me at rnmwales@shaw.ca
I was intrigue with the Orthodox Church years ago because I was getting frustrated with Fundamentalism and Finneyism that was a part of most of my early adult life. What peaked my interested was the book Sham Peals for Real Swine and Portofino by Frank(y) Schaeffer. Franky Schaeffer is the son of France Schaeffer who later converted to Orthodox Christianity. I even went to a Orthodox Church to listen to Frank Schaeffer speak on his conversion.
ReplyDeleteAt the time it seems to be the solution to the nuttiness of the religion that I grew up with. I am happy to tell that my journey went another direction.
Timotheus
http://www.skubalon.net
Thanks Timotheus.
ReplyDeleteWhen I was little my family attended the United Church of Canada. Although it had it errors and downplayed the gospel message, the Lord in my view used it to have me begin thinking about God and Christ as God. Over the last 16 years of academic education, the Lord has moved me towards largely Reformed theology. Since I was little I have always had a strong view of God's sovereignty.
Kingpin,
ReplyDeleteI got the E-mail at my AOL address. I didn't realize my regular E-mail wasn't showing up in my profile! You will receive a reply with the filled out questionnaire from kjsulli[at]gmail[dot]com.
Thanks!
Cheers, Kyle.
ReplyDeleteRuss
The trip to the Orthodox Church was worthwhile. I have one questionnaire in and another on the way. They were nice folks as was the priest. I reason that since they believe in the atoning work of Christ and his resurrection that they are a Christian church, and the priest viewed me as a Christian. There would be some theological differences as they hold to baptismal regeneration, which I do not hold to. In conjunction with my PhD work on theodicy, I view salvation as being caused by a regeneration of the spirit by the Holy Spirit through a sovereign act of God and would not necessarily take place at baptism. The Orthodox Church also venerates Icons which I see no need for as Christians. Christ is the mediator to the Father as in Hebrews 12: 24. Another learning experience...
ReplyDeleteYou really need to read Ware.
ReplyDelete(http://www.amazon.com/Orthodox-Church-New-Timothy-Ware/dp/0140146563) Some of your web sources are of doubtful credibility.
There are a few inaccuracies here, but you may see them as minor, being raised in a protestent setting.
First of all, there is no dispute over the Primacy of Peter, nor that all Bishops have equal footing. Patriachs of the Church are all considered equal, but that is a higher rank than Bishop. Peter, according to Orthodoxy, is First among Equals. In the Roman Church, he is merely first.
Second, a number of things continue to keep Orthodoxy and Christianty appart, and although Constantinople has recinded (in part) banns of excommunication, not all of the Patriarchs have.
Next there are a few theological issues that seperate the church. First and formost is the Filioque. Where the Roman Church professes that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, the Orthodox Church professes the Father as the sole source of the Godhead.
There are also practical issues in worship, including the concern of the Orthodox Church over the use of tinture in the Roman Eucherist, and the Roman concern over the Eastern use of leavened bread for the host.
Hi thanks for the comment.
ReplyDeleteYou really need to read Ware.
(http://www.amazon.com/Orthodox-Church-New-Timothy-Ware/dp/0140146563) Some of your web sources are of doubtful credibility.
It would be good if you could provide quotations from the book you mentioned. My only web source used is religionfacts.com, the others are academic books.
There are a few inaccuracies here, but you may see them as minor, being raised in a protestent setting.
Not really, I am going by what the sources stated, but I suppose they may be writing from Protestant perspectives.
First of all, there is no dispute over the Primacy of Peter, nor that all Bishops have equal footing. Patriachs of the Church are all considered equal, but that is a higher rank than Bishop. Peter, according to Orthodoxy, is First among Equals. In the Roman Church, he is merely first.
What I stated was the following:
P.D. Steeves explains that the theological dimension of the 1054 schism between the Western Roman Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church had to primarily do with the East's rejection of papal authority. Steeves (1996: 805). The Eastern Church viewed the papacy as having honour, but saw all bishops with correct teaching as being equally successors to Peter. Steeves (1996: 805). I don't think your point is fully dealing with what I stated and you are going beyond what was mentioned, but thanks for the added input. Looking at Steeves again, he states that "while granting a certain primacy of honor to the papacy, Orthodoxy saw all right-standing bishops as equally successors of Peter." (1986: 805).
Steeves according to the text is a Professor of History at Stetson University and received his PhD from the University of Kansas.
Second, a number of things continue to keep Orthodoxy and Christianty appart, and although Constantinople has recinded (in part) banns of excommunication, not all of the Patriarchs have.
Orthodoxy is not Christian?
Thank you.
Next there are a few theological issues that seperate the church. First and formost is the Filioque. Where the Roman Church professes that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son, the Orthodox Church professes the Father as the sole source of the Godhead.
That was discussed in the article. I stated the following:
The West and East disagreed in 867 on the filioque (and from the Son in Latin) clause inserted in the Nicene Creed as the West accepted the procession of the Holy Spirit from the Son, but this was rejected by the East. Cairns (1981: 205). Although Eastern Orthodoxy holds to the Trinity it disagreed with the idea of two originating principles within the Godhead as the Holy Spirit would proceed from the Father and Son, and not just the Father. Steeves (1996: 805). Many Eastern Orthodox thinkers could accept a formulation where the Holy Spirit proceeds through the Father, or with the Son. Steeves (1996: 805).
There are also practical issues in worship, including the concern of the Orthodox Church over the use of tinture in the Roman Eucherist, and the Roman concern over the Eastern use of leavened bread for the host.
Thanks.
Russ
Thanks Biby, your blog looks cool as well.
ReplyDelete