Yesterday |
PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.
The fallacy of reification is also known as hypostatization. It consists in the supposition that certain words denote real things. (178). The 'redness' of the sunset, as example. Pirie reasons 'redness' is not present with a red sun, red ball, or red anything. (178).
The fallacy is turning descriptive qualities into real things. (178).
Perceived redness can vary from wavelengths. Oxford Science defines colour as the sensation produced when light of different wavelengths falls onto the human eye. (178). The visible spectrum varies continuously with wavelength ranges. (178). There is an abstract aspect to the human evaluation of colours and how each set of human eyes would interpret the sensations of light and colour.
I see dark red, you see red-blue, etcetera. It is not an error to describe the redness of something in subjective terms, but it should not be understood as objective terminology.
Reification occurs when it is assumed that the descriptive attributes are as real as the objects they depend on. (178).
Logically fallacious
'Reification (also known as: abstraction, concretism, fallacy of misplaced concreteness, hypostatisation)
Description: When an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete, real event or physical entity -- when an idea is treated as if had a real existence.
Example #1: How can you not want to go jogging? Look at that street -- it’s calling your name. It wants your feet pounding on it. “Jog on me!”'
Oxford Dictionary of Science, (2010), Sixth Edition, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.
Yesterday |
No comments:
Post a Comment