Monday, February 01, 2010
Audio post: Free will theodicy versus sovereignty theodicy praxis
Durham Cathedral, Durham, England
Summary:
I speculate that theological praxis of sovereignty theodicy is more certain and comforting than free will theodicy, as transworld depravity is overcome by taking the primary choice of human belief in God away from corrupted human beings and placing it in the hands of a sovereign God.
Praxis:
Simon Blackburn writes that the term praxis originated in the era of Aristotle and included the concept of goal-directed action, the action in itself being part of the end. Praxis is not concerned with merely applying theoretical knowledge but adding to knowledge in the process of practically applying theory.
BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BRUCE, F.F. (1985)(1996) Romans, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.
Audio post:
praxis.mp3
By the way, primerically is a word I invented which is like primarily but means primarily with many numbers.;)
Art taken from You Tube by Jeff Jenkins of Thoughts and Theology in links. Image edited to fit by thekingpin68.
Thanks, Jeff!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
very nice of you to give us something to watch while listing. My I suggest a cage fighting video next time. LOL, Rick b
ReplyDeleteYes, very good idea. Captain Freedom, represting free will theodicy can battle Calvin Luther Edwards, of the sovereignty perspective. Perhaps they can do a tag team with Major Liberal represting atheism and The Sentimental One representing soul-making views.
ReplyDeleteThe joy of trying to market
high-end academics.
Thanks, Rick.:)
A fantastic picture of Durham Cathedral but how on earth can you already be in February??? If I see it right, that is, ............ Monday February 1 2010
ReplyDeleteThanks, M.D.
ReplyDeleteI think the Durham photo was probably from Google images. I change the date of the post as I would like two posts per month and so I make it work.
Russ:)
How about a sweet video of Jesus Crushing Lucifer under his foot? Of course it would have to be created by some one with skills
ReplyDeleteGood one, Rick.
ReplyDeleteRuss,
ReplyDeleteI think your audio lectures are getting better and better, with the exception of the brief high-pitched voice change at the very beginning, which I personally would have left out. Other than that, your audios are definitely improving, and it seems to me that you are putting more energy into your talks, which I think is key. I suspect that putting more energy into a talk makes that talk more interesting to listen to. That seemed to be the case in the Speech classes I took in college.
What you don't like the humour? Oh well.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the encouragement.
Trying to find a video similar to what Rick suggested. Haven't found a really good one yet, but this is interesting:
ReplyDeleteSatan - The Defeated Foe of God, Christ Jesus
What you don't like the humour? Oh well.
ReplyDeleteSorry. Maybe I just have a different sense of humor. For example, the British generally seem to enjoy a 'silly' type of humor which I don't really care for. As a more specific example, many people seem to like Mel Brooks' History of the World Part 1 and consider it a classic, but I never really cared for it. I also don't really like dry humor or puns. Everyone is different.
Cool, Jeff, no problems.
ReplyDeleteI am trying to work out some bugs associated with this post and FileFreak...no shock.
Stay tuned.
Here are some interesting self-defense moves. Of course, they would have to be practiced until they become second nature and until they are done with speed and exact precision, as the slightest error could mean injury or death.
ReplyDeleteSelf Defense moves
Okay Jeff, please notice that there are now two versions of the audio post from FileFreak. Although I deleted the first one from the folder because the second one would not load, the first one still works for some reason.
ReplyDeleteI actually practice moves similar to those self-defence ones from your link. But I am less circular in motion and probably use more brute force.
ReplyDeleteI have switched from mainly hard art defences to more evasive soft art defences since about 2001.
In thinking about theological and philosophical lectures, I came across this video (not really making any point or statement; just thought it was appropriate):
ReplyDeleteThe Art of the Lecture: Justice, a Harvard University Cours
Interaction is a key, and I plan on using it. That means less work for me as well. I have used interaction during my teaching internships.
ReplyDeleteJeff, actually that approach is standard now for most professors I have come across.
Cheers.
LOVE THE WILD CHASE :) HAVE TO GO BACK & LISTEN TO YOUR AUDIOS NOW :)
ReplyDeleteThanks, the two versions are the same except I deleted the guru section out of the second version!
ReplyDeleteGod bless, SHER.
Okay Jeff, please notice that there are now two versions of the audio post from FileFreak.
ReplyDeleteThe first version has a short imitation of a guru that Jeff does not like, but the guru went over well on the satire blog previously:
I was going to listen to it again to see if maybe I would like it better, now that I know it's supposed to be a guru's voice, but it says "File Not Found. The file you requested does not exist. It may have been deleted or the URL is incorrect."
Although I deleted the first one from the folder because the second one would not load, the first one still works for some reason.
As noted, it does not work for me.
But Jeff may be right and so here is a more totally serious version of the audio presentation:
Yes, I do like that one better.
Art by Jeff Jenkins of Thoughts and Theology in links.
Please note that I did not create that; I merely took a screen shot of a YouTube video. Such an image would be easy to create, but since I found an already-existing image that fit precisely, I just took a screen shot. (Why re-create the wheel?)
Jeff, actually that approach is standard now for most professors I have come across.
OK, interesting. I did not know that.
I can still get the first version on my computer, but I will try and reload it onto FileFreak.
ReplyDeleteI remember watching the Road Runner racing Speedy Gonzalez years ago, and I loved the idea of pitting them against each other in a race. I also liked the ideas of Freddy vs. Jason and Alien vs. Predator, though I admit the actual movies were not as good as the idea of it. I also loved the idea of the Flash vs. Superman, though the comic book was more thrilling than the animated version. HERE is a brief animation of the two of them fighting, which I had not seen before. And HERE is the Smallville version of it, though, since it is them as teenagers, it is more like Kid Flash vs. Superboy, but without any costumes.
ReplyDeleteWell done with the Flash and Superman. I have a comic over on kingpinned where they fight.
ReplyDeleteOkay, Jeff, the first audio is back up.
Here is a game I really wish I had. Batman vs. Liu Kang sounds like a great fight, but Superman or Wonder Woman vs. any of the characters from Mortal Kombat (with the possible exception of Shang Tsung or Quan Chi, or any other characters that use magic) is a ridiculous concept...but still loads of fun.
ReplyDeleteMORTAL KOMBAT vs DC UNIVERSE
Okay, Jeff, the first audio is back up.
ReplyDeleteYes, it works for me now. I listened to that first part again. I still like it better without that part. But maybe that's just me. Maybe some of your other readers will disagree with me. Maybe you should take a vote on it, like the audience interaction with lectures that was mentioned earlier.
Nice audio blog, very interesting topics and very well said and presented, practice makes perfect...although I think its wise to drop "The Groovy Guru" from your lectures, he is still a character that makes me laugh.
ReplyDeleteOverall...Good Job!
-Lavish Listener-
I always wondered who was faster, The Roadrunner or Speedy, what a cool race, wonder what would have happened if Wylie the Coyote could have ran faster??
ReplyDelete-Cartoons for the Curious-
'Nice audio blog, very interesting topics and very well said and presented, practice makes perfect...although I think its wise to drop "The Groovy Guru" from your lectures, he is still a character that makes me laugh.
ReplyDeleteOverall...Good Job!
-Lavish Listener-'
Thanks, L.L., while that is why I played you the second clip.:)
Curious,
ReplyDeleteCould the Road Runner give the Flash a good race?
MORTAL KOMBAT vs DC UNIVERSE
ReplyDeleteJeff, I have seen it previously on You Tube. It looks first-rate.
Well, Jeff, Bobby likes the guru but agrees with you that the audio presenation is better without him.
ReplyDeleteI guess it depends on the listener.
Cheers.
Jeff said That seemed to be the case in the Speech classes I took in college.
ReplyDeleteGroan.... My next 6 weeks in school are speech and English. I hate that stuff so much it seriously will be hard to keep my 4.0 GPA Going. Rick b
Rick, I eventually studied 40 hours per exam. I advise that you study much.
ReplyDeleteCGI Arminian debates CGI Calvinist (with synthesized British voices):
ReplyDeletedebate
I side with the Calvinist, from the bit we sampled, although for myself I prefer the term Reformed.
ReplyDeleteAs you suggested, I tried listening to your audio post (in a new browser tab) whilst watching the cartoon.
ReplyDeleteIt did not work out very well... :p
At least it is still there.
ReplyDeleteCheers.:)
I guess turning down the volume on the cartoon would help...
ReplyDeleteWorst movie fight ever?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3XeMqJSye0
-zomba_luv_tank
Thanks, Jamie.
ReplyDeleteThis is funny as well...
atheism blogs
Satire and theology is listed under atheism blogs.
Really liked listening to the Praxim audio, Varun
ReplyDeleteThanks very much, Varun.
ReplyDeleteRuss:)