Sunday, November 03, 2013

Otto Weber (PhD Edit)

Neuschwanstein Castle-trekearth
Otto Weber (PhD Edit)

Preface

Another PhD edit which adds depth to my PhD presented on this website and also isolates certain key Theologians and Philosophers, even if not key thesis exemplars.

Originally placed on this website 20131103 and with slight revisions for an entry on academia.edu, 20240710.

Omnipotence

Otto Weber suggests God has unlimited capacity[1] and unrestricted will.[2] God is unrestricted in what he determines within self and outside of self.[3] Presbyterian theologian John M. Frame admits the term omnipotence is not in Scripture,[4] but reasons the concept is Biblical.[5] He deduces that based on the Bible, it is impossible for anything to occur outside of what God has willed to happen.[6] 

(2024 note: Philosophically and theologically, I reason that God's eternal, infinite nature and attributes are never contradictory and/or illogical. By this I mean God cannot cease to exist, or create another infinite God, as examples. Omnipotence would be an aspect of divine, infinite nature)

Sola Scriptura 

Weber reasons the Reformation standard of sola scriptura firmly upheld Reformed views against counter propositions.[7] The Scripture is authoritative because it is the vehicle by which the Holy Spirit speaks, and therefore has divine authority.[8] The Bible is the product of the Christian community that produced it under the guidance of the Holy Spirit.[9] As Anglican Rowan Williams states, ‘Revelation is the statement of God’s autonomy.’[10] God explains who he is and becomes his own ‘alter ego’ as Christ.[11] Roman Catholic theologian Alan Schreck states his Church agrees that the Bible is the inspired word of God,[12] but does not believe that the Bible is the only source of Revelation and spiritual guidance for Christians.[13] A dividing point between Protestants and Catholics comes with Schreck’s idea that God within Catholic thought continues to select certain individuals that teach with God’s authority through the Holy Spirit.[14] Protestant and those within the Reformed camp have, at times throughout history disagreed, with the Biblical and theological interpretations of certain Roman Catholic leaders, in particular the Pope,[15] believed to be inspired by the Holy Spirit.[16]

Christology 

Weber explains that only God could bring peace to God and humanity, and this takes place through Christ.[17] Christ stood completely with human beings and yet was God.[18] Thiessen suggests that ‘no exact psychological analysis of the unique personality of Christ is possible.’[19] Jürgen Moltmann (1993) admits there is a mystery in regard to Christ and his incarnation.[20]  here is a mysterious incarnation of God into a reality that is ‘temporal, decaying, transitory existence in which men live and die.’[21] The eternal presence of God somehow in the incarnation exists among persons as God takes on ‘transitory, mortal being’ in order to become and cause humanity to become ‘intransitory’[22] and immortal, never facing death once again.[23] The New Testament depicts Christ as full deity with full divine power, and at the same time presents him as having the results of human finitude and mortality.[24] His deity should not be asserted in a way that negates his humanity and vice-versa.[25] Christ is equal to the Father in essence and nature as God,[26] and yet as human being he submitted to the Father in order to accomplish his earthly mission. Jesus Christ has a determination to be God, our God, and to be the reconciler of the world.[27]



[1] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).

[2] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).

[3] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).

[4] Frame (2002: 515).

[5] Frame (2002: 515).

[6] Frame (2002: 518). Weber (1955)(1981: 440).

[7] Weber (1955)(1981: 113-114).

[8] Franke (2005: 150).  Lindsell (1976:  28-40).

[9] Franke (2005: 151).  Lindsell (1976:  28-40).

[10] Williams (2007: 116).

[11] Williams (2007: 116).

[12] Schreck (1984: 41). 

[13] Schreck (1984: 42).   Strictly speaking as noted, those in Reformed theology do trust in non-Biblical truths for spiritual guidance.  Calvin admitted this in the context of Scripture and tradition.  Calvin (1543)(1996: 64).   I should also add that any reliance on philosophy and philosophy of religion is not strictly Biblical and I and many  Reformed scholars look to philosophy for truth. 

[14] Schreck (1984: 42). 

[15] Calvin explains, within The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, his opinion that at that point in history the Papacy was beyond Reform.  Calvin (1543)(1996: 17).

[16] Schreck (1984: 42). 

[17] Weber (1955)(1981: 383).

[18] Weber (1955)(1981: 383).

[19] Thiessen (1956: 305).  J.S. Whale explains that Christ is unique and to explain him leaves one in paradoxes.  Whale (1958: 106).

[20] Moltmann (1993: 88).  Christ has two natures in one person and there is an attempt to correlate the human and divine in Christ, but it remains a mystery.  Whale (1958: 105).

[21] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[22] Moltmann (1993: 88).  Lasting forever.

[23] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[24] Franke (2005: 72).

[25] Franke (2005: 72).

[26] Bavinck (1918)(2006 : 276 Volume 2).  Barth (1932-1968: 371). 

[27] Williams (2007: 130).

----

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 2: God and Creation, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 3: Sin and Salvation in Christ, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/calvin/institutes.html 

CALVIN, JOHN (1540)(1973) Romans and Thessalonians, Translated by Ross Mackenzie, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1550)(1978) Concerning Scandals, Translated by John W. Fraser, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1552)(1995) Acts, Translated by Watermark, Nottingham, Crossway Books. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1553)(1952) Job, Translated by Leroy Nixon, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1554)(1965) Genesis, Translated by John King, Edinburgh, The Banner of Truth Trust.

FRAME, JOHN M. (1999) ‘The Bible on the Problem of Evil: Insights from Romans 3:1-8,21-26; 5:1-5; 8:28-39’, IIIM Magazine Online, Volume 1, Number 33, October 11 to October 17, Fern Park, Florida, Third Millennium.

FRAME, JOHN M. (2002) The Doctrine of God, P and R Publishing, Phillipsburg, New Jersey.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005)  The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

GUNDRY, ROBERT H. (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids.

HINDSON, EDWARD E. (1874-1890)(1980) ‘Introduction’ within SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. Dogmatic Theology,  Volume 1, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

LINDSELL, HAROLD (1976) The Battle for the Bible, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.

MOLTMANN, JÜRGEN (1993) The Crucified God, Minneapolis, Fortress Press. 

MOLTMANN, JÜRGEN (1999) ‘Perseverance’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd.

SCHRECK, ALAN (1984) Catholic and Christian, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Servant Books. 

SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. (1874-1890)(1980) Dogmatic Theology,  Volume 1, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. (1874-1890)(1980) Dogmatic Theology,  Volume 2, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

THIESSEN, HENRY C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

WEBER, OTTO (1955)(1981) Foundations of Dogmatics, Volumes 1 and 2, Translated and annotated by Darrell L. Guder, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

WHALE, J.S. (1958) Christian Doctrine, Glasgow, Fontana Books.

WILLIAMS, ROWAN (2000) On Christian Theology, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.

WILLIAMS, ROWAN (2007) Wrestling with Angels, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids. 



[1] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).
[2] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).
[3] Weber (1955)(1981: 440).
[4] Frame (2002: 515).
[5] Frame (2002: 515).
[6] Frame (2002: 518). Weber (1955)(1981: 440).
[7] Weber (1955)(1981: 17).
[8] John Frame recognizes in light of Biblicism that there is still value in traditions, confessions and church history, although he believes in the sufficiency of the Scripture.  Frame (2002: 10). Biblicism is a wrong extreme but Frame desires that Scripture be correctly understood.
[9] Weber (1955)(1981: 17). Weber makes an excellent point as through academic theological blogging, for example,  I have found that some evangelical fundamentalists downplay the use of theology and any scholarship.  They prefer a plain literal read of the Bible and are sceptical of any scholarship that may challenge their views.
[10] Franke (2005: 8).
[11] Franke (2005: 9).
[12] Franke (2005: 9). Franke reasons that, with his approach, existing theological models will not be forced upon the Scripture.
[13] Franke (2005: 9). Although Christian orthodoxy is important Robert H. Gundry points out that the New Testament covers a time period of less than a century, while the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) covers thousands of years of history.  Gundry (1981: iii). Christian doctrine and orthodoxy needs to correctly understand the Hebrew Bible in context and not ‘read’ the New Testament into the original text.
[14] Hindson (1874-1890)(1980: iv).
[15] Hindson (1874-1890)(1980: iv). This is the case in all theological writing and especially in academic writing and research.
[16] Hindson (1874-1890)(1980: iv). Frame (2002: 10).
[17] Scripture is also not to be evaluated in isolation as various Scripture needs to be compared. Erickson (1994: 21).
[18] Shedd (1874-1890)(1980: 4 Volume 1).
[19] Shedd (1874-1890)(1980: 4 Volume 1).
[20] Weber (1955)(1981: 113-114).
[21] Franke (2005: 150). 
[22] Franke (2005: 151). 
[23] Williams (2007: 116).
[24] Williams (2007: 116).

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Reader Polls

Rio de Janeiro-Facebook

Reader Polls is an opportunity to provide feedback for my readers, most of whom wish to remain anonymous, although I know of some via Facebook and Blogger and can deduce others that may be readers, that are not interested in commenting on my blogs or dialogue with me by email in regard to blog articles.

At least at present.

Those that do comment on my blogs and dialogue with me by email have a further opportunity to influence blog content.

Assistance requested and as with the Google/Blogger blog statistics in regard to individual post pageviews, responses will be considered in regard to future blog content.

Thank you very much,

Russ:)

Should this blog feature more Biblical Studies posts?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog feature more Theology posts?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog feature more Philosophy of Religion posts?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog feature more webcam posts?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Are blog comments essential in adding blog content?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Are the world photos essential blog content?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Are world photos preferable to post subject photos as post headers?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Is some satire essential blog content?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog be presented more similarly to a strictly academic journal?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog feature more personal opinion?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Is this blog with the use of citations significantly different than Satire And Theology?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog continue to focus primarily on theological issues such as the nature of God and salvation, theodicy and the problem of evil?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog continue to focus on social, moral issues secondarily?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Should this blog continue to focus on political issues secondarily?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Do you read this blog and Satire And Theology?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Do you check my blog updates via Facebook?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Do you check my blog updates via Google+?
  
pollcode.com free polls 


Is the odd off-blog subjects post appreciated?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

In regard to blog templates, do they appear updated?
  
pollcode.com free polls 

Would a live webcam, roundtable presentation be of interest?
  
pollcode.com free polls 
End

From

Twenty Two Words

Not too many around here it appears...
Agreed. Often annoying.
I can make equal salad at home but not equal pizza...
Ballet works against the stereotype...
Interesting information, but a boring version of Facebook. Even Google+ is less boring.
I disagree, it should be Mcfatastics or Mcflabulouses-Flickr
Same for Canada's Much Music.-Flickr
In the neighbourhood...

Monday, October 14, 2013

Sovereignty Theodicy/Defence & Culture (PhD Edit)

Bora Bora-Facebook

Happy Thanksgiving

My questionnaire data does not demonstrate a complete rejection of Reformed, Calvinistic, sovereignty theodicy, which is not accepted on key points in contrast to the acceptance of free will theodicy.[1]   It can be reasoned that Reformed compatibilistic concepts have been primarily rejected.[2]  With the very important Question 22, if God does not cause evil according to the majority of respondents, the reasonable conclusion would be an acceptance of the idea from free will theodicy that human beings alone cause evil and corruption.[3]  A compatibilistic model, as noted within the work, views both God and humanity as the cause of evil[4] with God as the primary cause,[5] but with sinless motives.[6]  There is also the important non-support of the ideas of God causing human actions, and deciding who shall follow him in election,[7] which are essential within a compatibilistic framework for God to fulfill his purposes and turn certain sinful human beings into members of his everlasting Kingdom.[8]  Sovereignty theodicy is not as publicized as free will theodicy,[9] is not taught as much in post-secondary education, and is not as culturally relevant in Western society as free will concepts, which support libertarianism.[10] 

In order for Reformed concepts of compatibilism and theodicy to gain increased prominence within the Christian Church,[11] sovereignty theodicy needs to be correctly explained, but theoretical theodicy is not sufficient in itself as its practical ramifications must be explained.  A major reason why a sovereignty theodicy explains God wills all things, including evil and sin or the greater good,[12] is that with this and in particular, through the results of the atoning work and resurrection of Christ, God will ultimately rid his creation of the problem of evil.[13]
 



[1] It can reasoned from the results that Reformed theology in the context of theodicy is not dominating Christian theological thought. 
[2] This is significant enough to demonstrate that Reformed theology in regard to theodicy and free will and determinism has been overshadowed by the free will/incompatibilistic research and work of those such as Augustine and Plantinga.
[3] Augustine (421)(1998: Chapter 13: 8).  Plantinga (1982: 184-189).
[4] Erickson (1994: 361).  Calvin (1543)(1996: 37-40).
[5] Erickson (1994: 361).
[6] Calvin (1543)(1996: 37-40).
[7] Whale (1958: 63).  Calvin (1543)(1996: 136).
[8] Calvin mentions in his Acts Commentary that people who were strangers to the Kingdom of God, were purchased by Christ and flourished within.  Calvin (1552)(1995: 415).
[9] This is quite clear from several years of academic research.
[10] Blackburn (1996: 218). 
[11] In particular within Reformed churches.
[12] Cranfield (1992: 204).  Mounce (1995: 187).  Admittedly human beings often greatly struggle to see and understand this theoretical greater good.  Davis (1981: 23).  Roth reasons some evil willed by God is simply and only that and should be repented for by God. Roth (1981: 10). 
[13] Moltmann (1993: 256).  Calvin (1552)(1995: 415).  Feinberg (1994: 141).  Mounce (1990: 369-397).

Bibliography

AUGUSTINE (388-395)(1964) On Free Choice of the Will, Translated by Anna S.Benjamin and L.H. Hackstaff, Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall.

AUGUSTINE (398-399)(1992) Confessions, Translated by Henry Chadwick, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

AUGUSTINE (400-416)(1987)(2004) On the Trinity, Translated by Reverend Arthur West Haddan, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, Series One, Volume 3, Denver, The Catholic Encyclopedia. 

AUGUSTINE (421)(1998) Enchiridion, Translated by J.F. Shaw, Denver, The Catholic Encyclopedia.

AUGUSTINE (426)(1958) The City of God, Translated by Gerald G. Walsh, Garden City, New York, Image Books.

AUGUSTINE (427)(1997) On Christian Doctrine, Translated by D.W. Robertson Jr., Upper Saddle River, N.J., Prentice Hall.

AUGUSTINE (427b)(1997) On Christian Teaching, Translated by R.P.H. Green, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

CALVIN, JOHN (1552)(1995) Acts, Translated by Watermark, Nottingham, Crossway Books.

CRANFIELD, C.E.B. (1992) Romans: A Shorter Commentary, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

DAVIS, STEPHEN T. (1981)(ed.), Encountering Evil, Atlanta, John Knox Press.

FEINBERG. JOHN S. (1986) Predestination and Free Will, David Basinger and Randall Basinger (eds.), Downers Grove, Illinois, InterVarsity Press.

FEINBERG, JOHN S. (1994) The Many Faces of Evil, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House. 

FEINBERG, JOHN S. (2001) No One Like Him, John S. Feinberg (gen.ed.), Wheaton, Illinois, Crossway Books.

MOLTMANN, JÜRGEN (1993) The Crucified God, Minneapolis, Fortress Press. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1995) The New American Commentary: Romans, Nashville, Broadman & Holman Publishers.

PLANTINGA, ALVIN C. (1977)(2002) God, Freedom, and Evil, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

PLANTINGA, ALVIN C. (1982) The Nature of Necessity, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

ROTH, JOHN K. (1981) Encountering Evil, Stephen T. Davis (ed.), Atlanta, John Knox Press. 

WHALE, J.S. (1958) Christian Doctrine, Glasgow, Fontana Books.

Question 22
















Question 22: God does not cause evil

This free will theodicy based question deals with a crucial and original aspect of my PhD thesis and statistical data. I conclude within a sovereignty perspective that God does cause evil and I will explain this concept in this Chapter from both theological and philosophical perspectives from my theoretical research in the Theology and Application section. One hundred and seventy-nine respondents (84%) selected ‘AS/A’ for this question. Only 17 (8%) persons supported my notion by choosing ‘D/DS’.

Additional

Determinism meaning hard determinism and opposed to soft determinism/compatibilism. God is still the cause of all things, but I am acknowledging a limited free will by Adam and Eve. God does not 'cause' as in force or coerce but is the cause of all things as in first cause being infinite and omnipotent.

My backyard...
Autumn, when some trees wear alternate jerseys.



Plitvice Lake, Croatia-Facebook

Monday, October 07, 2013

Some Extrabiblical Evidence For The Existence Of The Historical Jesus Christ

Zaraka, Greece-trekearth

Listening to Gary Habermas lectures and interviews on his website the concept of this short post was created.

From Historian Earle E. Cairns:

In regard to extrabiblical evidence for the existence of the historical Jesus Christ.

Roman and related

Tacitus (55-117) a Roman historian connected the name and origin of Christians with 'Christus' who under Emperor Tiberius was put to death by Procurator Pontius Pilate. Cairns (1981: 45).

Pliny, the propraetor of Bithynia and Pontus in Asia Minor wrote a letter to Emperor Trajan at about 112 for guidance on how he should deal with the Christians. He noted that they 'sing a song to Christ as to a God'. Cairns (1981: 45).

Suetonius in 'Lives of the Twelve Caesars' writes that the Jews were expelled from Rome because of disturbances over 'Chrestos'. Cairns (1981: 45). He is noted to have mentioned the fire in Rome in 64 under Emperor Nero and that Nero inflicted punishment on Christians. McDowell (1999: 121).

Lucian (ca. 125-190) wrote a satirical review of Christians at about 170 and described Christ that was crucified in Palestine after he began 'a new cult'. Cairns (1981: 46). McDowell adds that he 'spoke scornfully of Christ and the Christians'. McDowell (1999: 121).

Jewish

Josephus (37-ca 100) wrote of James the brother of Jesus the so called Christ. There is some debate in regard to the authenticity of Josephus writings. There may have been according to critics 'interpolation by Christians' but Cairns writes that most scholars accept the writing as from Josephus and as original text. What Josephus wrote demonstrates he was not an ally of Christians or Christianity. Cairns (1981: 46).

McDowell mentions that within the Babylonian Talmud it states 'In has been taught: On the of Passover they hanged Yeshu'. McDowell (1999: 123-124). Hanged being a crucifixion reference. McDowell (1999: 123). Jesus and his disciples, five of them are also mentioned. McDowell (1999: 124). In one section Jesus is also called 'Such-an-one is a bastard of an adulteress'. McDowell (1999: 124).

Interesting that McDowell used Gary Habermas as a major source.

Christian

Cairns mentions that there are many Christian 'apocryphal gospels, acts, letters and apocalypses' Cairns (1981: 46). These would depend as in predicate on an historical Christ existing. Cairns (1981: 46).

CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.

MCDOWELL, JOSH (1999) The New Evidence That Demands A Verdict, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

Vancouver