Saturday, November 03, 2007

Theology and Religion


Blue Mountains, Sydney

photo from Richard Cross

Richard's website:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/mr_richard_x/

My dialogue with Rick in the comments in the last article has provided some ideas for this article. We were discussing academic and common evangelical ways of interpreting the word ‘religion’. Religion can be correctly understood in evangelical circles as human attempts to know God, whereas Biblical Christianity originates from God revealing himself to humanity in Scripture. I can agree with this explanation, but since I am completing a PhD at a major secular University, I must be prepared to use academic definitions. I am sharing in small amounts some of my dissertation material on this academic philosophical theology blog.

According to S.A.Nigosian, religion is derived from the Latin religio, but its etymology is disputed. Some scholars have tried to connect religio with other Latin terms such relegere (to reread) relinquere (to relinquish), and religare (to relegate, to unite, to bind together). The last word has often been connected to religio, but overall this is too narrow of an approach. Nigosian (1994: 1). Nigosian notes that the term religion has little significance to non-Western persons, who would view religion as some type of relationship between God and human beings. Nigosian (1994: 1-2). Lewis M. Hopfe explains also that the word religion comes from the Latin religio, which refers to fear or awe one feels when in the presence of a spirit or a god. Hopfe (1991: 3). Hopfe writes that religions often deal with the relationship between the unseen world of spirits, demons, and gods, have a system of myths and attempt to commune and appease these unseen forces, are organized and have places of worship and scripture, have statements about the afterlife, and have some type of following. Hopfe (1991: 7). Nigosian comes up with a definition, which states that religion is the creative activity of the human mind that satisfies inherent spiritual needs. Nigosian (1994: 6). Although I acknowledge these are acceptable academic definitions, and would be suitable for my PhD dissertation and questionnaire, they do not accurately fully describe my philosophical theology. There is definitely an element of Christian theology, which understands human beings as seeking to learn more about God, but within my Reformed perspective this would take place through the guidance of God’s Spirit. It has been stated repeatedly on this blog in several ways that God predestines those who shall follow Christ as in Ephesians 1:4-12, and that God makes the choice to regenerate a certain individual and moulds a person through the work of the Holy Spirit to freely believe. Following Christ is not a human choice primarily, but I do not believe persons follow Christ through compulsion. Calvin (1543)(1996: 68). A person is regenerated by God’s choice and freely believes simultaneously. Therefore in the context of this blog, the term religion may suffice in a limited way to describe Christianity as one theological perspective among many claiming to be true, but in a deeper sense the term religion fails to adequately deal with many aspects of my philosophical theology. It must be remembered that when one is writing academic material there needs to be objectivity used at all times and in certain contexts by classifying Christianity as religion in enables the reader to understand that the writer at least can intellectually grant that many in the world, both scholars and students, view Christianity as merely a religion among many. My writings will of course counter this understanding, but the use of the term religion can allow the Christian theologian to enter Biblical Christianity into the debate among what are deemed as world religions, and then respectfully argue for the truth of Christian theological systems.

My approach in dealing with the term ‘religion’ demonstrates how this blog works. On one hand, the material is academic and slightly watered down from what appears in my PhD, and on the other hand, I attempt to make it as readable and relatable as possible to scholars and students alike who may read and comment on this blog. Satire and theology deals with this material at times as well, but I have opted there to make the articles shorter and with less use of citation. On thekingpin68, however, I am dedicated to this being an academic, philosophical theology blog from which I learn more about theology and related subjects, and hopefully help some others. The tension of remaining true to academic criteria and also being understandable to the average reader will always exist. This will take continued learning for all involved in this blog, for myself and my readers and those who comment. But, 1 Peter 3:15 tells the believer to always be ready to give a defense to everyone that asks, and therefore Christians, both scholars and student alike are compelled to learn everlastingly.

On a side note, I am interested with linking in blog links with others. If anyone is considering placing a link to this blog (and/or satire and theology) on your blog or website, I would seriously considering linking you back.

Cheers

Russ:)

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

HOPFE, LEWIS M. (1991) Religions of the World, New York, Macmillan Publishing Company.

NIGOSIAN, S.A. (1994) World Faiths, New York, St. Martin’s Press.

http://satireandtheology.blogspot.com/2007/11/facebook-quotes-2-post-halloween_01.html

14 comments:

  1. I think the most common understanding of religion would be any kind of faith in a higher power, regardless of whether or not it originates in the human mind. There are probably many Christians who would not call themselves religious (from the evangelical understanding), but whom anyone else would call religious anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another good article, and I admit I must sometimes reread before I can comment. You do have a way of expressing your thoughts to make it clear to your readers, and I believe that there are times in the life of each individual when they will feel the need to turn to God for sustainance, having the faith that there is such a God. When those particular times arise, each individual will know how geat and strong God's love for each individual can be. This has been experienced by me in the past, and these are unforgetable moments. May God bless you in you endeavours.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You do have a way of expressing your thoughts to make it clear to your readers

    Thank you, very much. This is a goal I have while writing this blog.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well I am glad to see I inspired a topic by you. LOL.

    My view or thoughts on religion our like this. Religion is mans attempt at covering his sin by his own hands and getting into heaven with out God. Example, Adam and eve covered their Sin by using figs leaves, God said thats not good enough, so God covered them.

    Every religion in the world either trys to cover them selves with good works or some type of work apart from God. Christians simply allow God to cover them with his shed blood, if A christian trys and adds works they either are only a Christian in name and not for real, or they are really young and do not understand the Bible.

    Christianty is not a religion, it is a relationship with the living God. Rick b

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks, Rick.

    You have made good comments concerning the evangelical understanding of Christianity and religion. Christianity is God's determined plan to save the elect and therefore is not merely a religion among many, but is God's method of saving persons. I do not personally consider myself religious, but as stated in the article understand that academically, Christianity is a world religion.

    Cheers:)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks "thekingpin68" for your comment; I really appreciate it!

    And good luck with your Ph.D!!!! Your basically a Doctor already.

    Take care,

    JME

    ReplyDelete
  7. Your basically a Doctor already.

    My pastor tells me that as well, but I wish my bank account 'knew' it.:)

    Thanks very much, Jimmy, and all the best with your plans.

    ReplyDelete
  8. KingPin said: I do not personally consider myself religious, but as stated in the article understand that academically, Christianity is a world religion.


    The reason why people in general think we are a religion is because they really do not fully understand Christianity.

    It's like Islam, they teach, send your Sons to die for god, yet with Christians it is, God sent His son to Die for us. BIG Difference.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Cheers, Rick.

    I agree that many in our world do not understand Christianity, and many I would add, do not want to. As well, since most persons are not-regenerated they will not want Christianity to be the exclusive way to God, for which they are excluded being outside of Christ. It makes sense then, that Christianity will be considered by non-believers, both scholars and students alike, to be a 'religion' and a way to God, and not the exclusive way of salvation. When writing my questionnaire and dissertation at a secular institution, I am forced to recognize this bias.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "on the other hand, I attempt to make it (...) readable" - and this works for sure - I always like coming over :-)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Thanks Helen.

    I like reading/commenting on your blog as well.:)

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Religion." Good one Russ. Personally I think it's a pretty wide ranging term. We have religious people here in Australia and it's got nothing to do with a spiritual journey. They are religious about their Rugby, Cricket, and Aussie Rules. It might follow that they get on a high and it might be somewhat spiritual if their team wins for the first time in 44 years like Geelong did this year. Today is Melbourne Cup Day and the nation stops for the biggest horse race in Australia. I'm going for a MTB ride and that's spiritual I reckon.
    Anyway just a thought.
    Russell.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Good point, Russell.

    Being religious could be devotion to something other than religion by some definitions.

    Cheers.

    ReplyDelete