Monday, February 10, 2020

Prima facie

Today
BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

Blackburn's definition 

'Prima facie (right, obligation)'. (301). From the Latin defined as on first appearance. 

This was a term that I came across within thousands of pages of theology and philosophy of religion in regards to the problem (s) of evil and theodicy.

An admittedly, very non-exhaustive, 'street take' I put on the term, for memory, at that time, was 'in the face'. 

Blackburn explains that David Ross (1877-1940) used prima facie meaning 'genuine obligations that may yet have to contend with others, and sometimes yield to them'. (301). The example is given that an appointment should be kept but may be missed due to an emergency. (301).

Blackburn explained...the difficulty for a deontological ethic (ethics based on duty or what is right page 100) is to rank prima facie obligations. (301). 

(Note this opposed to more pragmatic results with consequential/consequentialism approaches)

What is evil based on first appearance? What is evil that is actually in the face?

(Non-exhaustive examples)

The biblical Christian could state, abortion on demand, and the secular humanist could state pro-life philosophy. The biblical Christian could state, humanities rejection of the biblical God, while the secular humanist could state it is all religion. 

Seems to me reading through thousands of pages of theology and philosophy of religion texts, within mainly both Christian and secular worldviews, there was and is plenty of room for debating what was and is actually prima facie, prima facie evil (s) and prima facie gratuitous evil (s); and with some level of agreement, how these should be ranked. 

Wednesday, February 05, 2020

The Orthodox Study Bible: Annunciation

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

My review of this academically impressive Bible and Orthodoxy continues (please see archives for other related articles, always featuring the red cover).

Again, for clarity, I am firmly theologically within a Reformed tradition and am a member of an evangelical, Mennonite Brethren Church with some Reformed leanings.

From the Glossary and the Reverend John W. Morris, PhD

Annunciation

Quote

'The visit of the Archangel Gabriel to the Virgin Mary to inform her that she had been chosen to bear Christ, the Son of God. The Feast of the Annunciation is celebrated exactly nine months before Christmas. Mary's Son was no ordinary child, but God's divine Son and Word in human flesh.' (794). The text cites Isaiah 7: 14, Luke 1: 26-28, John 1: 1-14. (794).

At Luke 1 in the text, there is an article 'Mary'. (135). It states: 'For two thousand years the Church has preserved the memory of the Virgin Mary as the prototype for all Christians.' (135).

Quote

'Mary is our model in that she was the first person to receive Jesus Christ.' (135).

Quote

'In obedience to God's clear intention, therefore the Orthodox Church honors Mary in icons, hymns and special feast days. (135).

Quote

'We venerate her-but we do not worship her, for worship belongs to God alone. (135).

Revised from previous review entries...

Do the icons of Orthodoxy border on idolatry? (xvi). 

I can accept the Orthodox claim the icons are never worshipped, only venerated, as in historical characters depicted, shown respect. (xvi). The text explains its view that Orthodoxy is very serious in regards to obeying the second commandment from the Hebrew Bible that (paraphrased) prohibits forms of idolatry, such as the worship of a craved image. (xvi).

I have referenced my Protestant, Reformed different theology in regard to veneration: New American Standard Bible (examples)

Hebrews 9: 15 For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant, so that, since a death has taken place for the redemption of the transgressions that were committed under the first covenant, those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.

Hebrews 12:24 and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood, which speaks better than the blood of Abel.
 ---

In regard to reverence, related to prayer, Jesus Christ, as God-man, via the Trinity, within the Christian Church, is our source of applied atonement and resurrection, and this eliminates the need for any human, finite mode of veneration. My deduction is veneration to the Saints is also a form of mediation in some cases, at least, and this type of mediation is presented in the book of Hebrews as taking place through Jesus Christ that is both God and incarnated perfect man.

Mediation should be directed toward God. Further, as well as God the Son, God the Holy Spirit is also worthy of prayer, veneration and for mediation, this also eliminates the need for Saints in this process.

Romans 8:26-27 New American Standard Bible (NASB) (example) 26 In the same way the Spirit also helps our weakness; for we do not know how to pray as we should, but the Spirit Himself intercedes for us with groanings too deep for words; 27 and He who searches the hearts knows what the mind of the Spirit is, because He intercedes for the [a]saints according to the will of God. Footnotes: Romans 8:27 Or holy ones

Within the Protestant tradition, especially Reformed and Evangelical, I would deduce, Mary the Mother of Jesus Christ is not typically given any special theological priority. She is not often noted as the Virgin Mary, but as Mary, the mother of Jesus. As a biblical, Reformed theologian and philosopher of religion, I honestly cannot see reasonable, biblical, premises that would support a significant Mariology that is listed as a primary or even secondary key doctrine. Mary should simply be respected as a servant of God as would many other historical characters from the Hebrew Bible and New Testament.
---

The Pocket Theological Dictionary describes

Mariology 

Quote

The theological teaching about Mary the Mother of Jesus. (75). This text notes that via tradition (not mainly the New Testament, my add), the Roman Catholic Church has developed certain theology within Mariology that has become dogma. That is essential doctrines. (75).

Primary doctrines.

The Pocket Theological Dictionary explains (paraphrased): These dogmatic affirmations include, non-exhaustively: Mary's immaculate conception (Mary was supernaturally not tainted by original sin, my add), and her perpetual virginity, and continued sinlessness. (75).

Historical Reformed theology and my Reformed theology, reject theology that reasons Mary, the mother of Jesus, was sinless and a perfect human being, in contrast to God the Son, Jesus Christ, that in the New Testament was sinless and perfect as God-man. This type of Mariology is a product of tradition and not the New Testament in context.

Hebrews for example, portrays the God-man, Jesus Christ, as having no human equals in regards to his mediation to fallen, sinful humanity through his death and resurrection, his atoning work and resurrection.

Hebrews 9: 15 For this reason He is the mediator of a new covenant...

Mary, as fully human, and not divine, was mediated for, not a mediator.

I am not making a complete equivalency between the Roman Catholic and Orthodoxy in regard to Mariology, to be clear. They are two separate traditions with similarities and differences. My views are closer to Orthodoxy than Roman Catholic, but again, I am firmly Reformed.
---

GRENZ, STANLEY J., DAVID GURETZKI and CHERITH FEE NORDLING (1999) Pocket Dictionary of Theological Terms, Downers Grove, Ill., InterVarsity Press.

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

Sunday, February 02, 2020

Truth versus

Hopefully discussing the truth, over fancy tea.
I listened to this sermon recently. I will comment briefly on the introductory comments from the message.

Cited

False Doctrine - by Michael Phillips Spiritual Depression - Part 10 of 13 Sermon Notes Galatians 4:15 Jan 27, 2008 am

Link

Cited

Please rank the following five things in order of importance for living the Christian Life. So as to not tip my hand on what I think most important, I'll give them to you in alphabetical order and with a short, neutral description of what I mean by each one of them: 

(My comments)

Activity

Morality 

Niceness 

Sincerity 

Truth 

By activity I mean doing things for Christ, the Church, and the Kingdom. Things like praying, reading the Bible, attending church, putting money in the offering box, witnessing to the lost, helping out at the Rescue Mission, and voting for good causes and candidates. 

(Activity can be for the good or the bad)

By morality I mean living a good life, working hard, paying your bills, being faithful to your spouse, telling the truth, not stealing, cussing, or watching immoral movies.

(Morality and ethics are good, but according to the New Testament, persons are not saved, post-mortem, through morality and ethics; people are not saved by good works, Ephesians 2, for example. People are saved, including being made legally justified, through the imputed righteousness of Jesus Christ, by the applied atoning and resurrection of Jesus Christ by grace alone, through faith alone, which should lead to good works for God, when divine regeneration of persons takes place.)

By niceness I mean being easy to get along with, friendly, helpful, and pleasant. 

(Niceness is generally better to use, but sometimes stating the truth, even in love, at least risks being perceived as not nice. It has been stated that the gospel, the good news, is bad news for those that do not embrace it.)

By sincerity I mean really believing what you believe and trying to live up to it. 

(People can be sincerely right or sincerely wrong and there are degrees of each)

By truth I mean the main doctrines of the Bible. I'm not sure which of the four would be at the top of the list for most believers, but I know very well which one would be at the bottom! Truth.

Cited

And the not-so-good, II Thessalonians 2:12- That they may all be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness. 

I'll put it to you as plainly as I can: Receiving the Truth will promote your salvation, while rejecting or ignoring it will put you in grave danger of not being saved at all. The Truth matters!
---

God reveals himself supernaturally, primarily and as the final authority, through the Hebrew Bible and New Testament books. By definition a reasonable understanding of biblical and theological premises and conclusions that teaches essential doctrines, the nature of God, salvation, sin and humanity, as examples, requires understanding, accepting and applying truth.

Truth is the most important concept of those mentioned and listed in the sermon, in my view. Equally important is love. In other words, divine directed truth and divine directed love.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

BOICE, JAMES, MONTGOMERY (1981) Foundations of the Christian Faith, Downers Grove, IVP Press.

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (2003) What Does God Know and When Does He Know It?, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

Tuesday, January 28, 2020

Questions: Matthew 21: 28-32

Greek Islands: Facebook
Questions with my finalized copy for Easter church devotional series

In regards to Matthew 21: 28-32 

Matthew 21:28-32 English Standard Version (ESV) 28 “What do you think? A man had two sons. And he went to the first and said, ‘Son, go and work in the vineyard today.’ 29 And he answered, ‘I will not,’ but afterward he changed his mind and went. 30 And he went to the other son and said the same. And he answered, ‘I go, sir,’ but did not go. 31 Which of the two did the will of his father?” They said, “The first.” Jesus said to them, “Truly, I say to you, the tax collectors and the prostitutes go into the kingdom of God before you. 32 For John came to you in the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes believed him. And even when you saw it, you did not afterward change your minds and believe him.

Questions 

1. How does conflicting Kingdoms impact us?

(We embrace the gospel Kingdom through Christ, but we are only part of the true Kingdom of God because God has regenerated us (Titus 3), as we are born again (John 3).)

(We are citizen of the Kingdom of God by grace through faith by the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ, for good works, but not by our own works. (Ephesians 1-2))

(We embrace salvation, given to us by God.)

2. What do we practically do with knowledge of conflicting Kingdoms? 

(We prayerfully ask that God will guide us to be humble, obedient citizens that can assist in the growth of other citizens (Christians) and be good witnesses to non-citizens.)

3. Who are we in this story? 

(If we become too judgmental and arrogant in looking down on others that do not confess Jesus, we can be like persons with a false view of God. When we prayerfully, in humility, being saved by grace through faith, act Christ-like, we can be effective Christians with gospel witness.)

4. How should we treat others that are within the false Kingdom?

(We should treat others with love and respect. Living the gospel and presenting it where good situations arise.)

5. How should we act when we are hated for our Kingdom citizenship?

(We can be relatable as human beings that are finite and sinful, as are all human beings that live today. When reasonably possible, we can lovingly explain that we relate with our non-Christian fellow human beings, but that the gospel provides us with forgiveness of sins, through Christ.)  

COURSON, JON (2005) Application Commentary, Thomas Nelson, Nashville.

ELLISON, H.L. (1986) ‘Matthew’, in F.F. Bruce (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

FRANCE, R.T. (1985) Matthew, Grand Rapids, IVP, Eerdmans.

MARSHALL, ALFRED (1975)(1996) The Interlinear KJV-NIV, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

MEYER, HEINRICH, AUGUST, WILHELM (1884-1887) Meyer's Commentary on the New Testament, New York, Funk and Wagnalls.