Predestined (PhD)

Solva, Pembrokeshire, Wales (trekearth.com)



The new coat of arms of the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David. I am emailing them now again, this time higher up the chain, way higher, asking for my official paperwork. This will be the third email, or emails perhaps, in three weeks I have sent.

A certain relative said (paraphrased), 'Why don't you apply for a job there and state that your doctorate was confirmed by email (which it was)'.

Predestined (PhD)

In my mind, the concept of compatibilism, although the term is not used,[1] is implied in Scripture. The subject of predestination for salvation, for example, is a complex theological discussion and could be a topic for a Biblical Greek thesis.[2] However, within Ephesians 1,[3] ‘predestined’ which is προορίσας[4] within Ephesians 1: 5,[5] and in the context is ‘predestined us to adoption as sons through Jesus Christ’[6] and προορισθέντες[7] at Ephesians 1: 11, as in ‘we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to his purpose’[8] appear to support Reformed compatibilist notions. Strong defines proorizw[9] which is the root word connected to the forms of the word in Ephesians 1, as to limit in advance in figurative terms,[10] and to predetermine, determine before, ordain, and predestinate.[11] Bauer defines the root word as meaning to decide before hand, predestine of God and applies this definition to Ephesians 1: 5 and 11.[12] Minimally, there appears reasonable textual support from this verse[13] that could support a Reformed compatibilistic perspective on how God chooses persons for his ultimate culminated Kingdom.

There are incompatibilist, evangelical counters to the Reformed view.[14] Ephesians scholar Francis Foulkes (1989) explains that predestination is not in opposition to human free will.[15] The gospel of grace was offered to all persons,[16] and those persons that accepted the message were elected.[17] Foulkes insists that the human faith required rests totally on God and not in self.[18] Foulkes then shifts the issue to the idea that election is not simply salvation, but also holiness of life.[19] He defines predestined as ‘marked beforehand.’[20] It is understood as a divine, eternal plan.[21] Foulkes presentation is commendable and reasonable and although his definition is similar to that of Strong[22] and Bauer,[23] he appears to downplay a deterministic aspect of the word.[24] I do not agree, but inevitably, even with the use of linguistic sources there is room for debate and I lean toward a compatibilistic understanding based on Ephesians 1.[25] Browning, an Oxford New Testament scholar,[26] also sides with a view similar to Foulkes noting that God has a plan of salvation for humanity and persons may freely accept or reject this plan on a personal basis.[27] Within Reformed theology, election is based on God’s plan and initiative to save the elect,[28] as opposed to primarily foreknowledge[29] of human acceptance of the gospel message within a Reformed, Calvinistic framework.

Schelling also presents a view on predestination[30] that human beings act today as they have always acted since ‘eternity’ and at the beginning of creation.[31] Persons continue to act wickedly because in eternity human beings took a stand in ‘egotism and selfishness.’[32] Within this view, passion and desire which can at times go wrong, represent freedom in the nature of human beings.[33] All persons are born with a ‘dark principle of evil attached to them.’[34] Persons can be good, even with this darkness through ‘divine transmutation.’[35] This non-traditional perspective would view human beings as predestined to commit evil[36] but allows for God to still work good within persons.[37]

I reason that the Bible when taken in proper context,[38] provides some important insights[39] into the logical and gratuitous problems of evil, and I favour the Reformed perspective strongly without negating the other views, including incompatibilism, in an unfair manner. Although I am a theist, I readily admit that atheists too have some good insights[40] at times, as for example Flew[41] and Mackie[42] make some reasonable criticisms of Plantinga’s work as discussed in Chapter Two.

[1] The term being a modern philosophical one.

[2] This is not a Biblical Studies PhD and I was therefore advised to limit my Biblical work within this thesis, but I seek accuracy in my Biblical interpretations.

[3] A key Chapter for Reformed views on compatibilism.

[4] The Greek New Testament (1993: 654).

[5] The Greek New Testament (1993: 654).

[6] The New American Standard Version Bible (1984: 1322).

[7] The Greek New Testament (1993: 655).

[8] The New American Standard Version Bible (1984: 1322).

[9] Strong (1890)(1986: 81).

[10] Strong (1890)(1986: 81).

[11] Strong (1890)(1986: 81).

[12] Bauer (1979: 709).

[13] I realize many other verses could be examined concerning this subject. I provide Ephesians 1 as a prime Reformed example within a limited space allotted for this topic.

[14] Foulkes (1989: 55).

[15] Foulkes (1989: 55).

[16] Foulkes (1989: 55). Browning (1997: 301).

[17] Foulkes (1989: 55). Browning writes that the New Testament does not state that those that reject this offer are damned to hell. Browning (1997: 301).

[18] Foulkes (1989: 55). Frankly, Foulkes does not explain how this works within his incompatibilistic system.

[19] Foulkes (1989: 55). I can agree that God does work out holiness in his people.

[20] Foulkes (1989: 56).

[21] Foulkes (1989: 56).

[22] Strong (1890)(1986: 81).

[23] Bauer (1979: 709).

[24] Foulkes (1989: 55-56).

[25] I can still consider incompatibilistic notions and other perspectives, when needed.

[26] Browning (1997: i). Browning provides an Anglican perspective.

[27] Browning (1997: 301).

[28] Calvin (1543)(1996: 200).

[29] Thiessen (1956: 344).

[30] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66).

[31] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66). Creation is not passive and is dynamic and in constant activity. Gutmann (1845)(1936: xxiii). This non-passive activity included rebellion within Schelling’s view.

[32] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66).

[33] Gutmann (1845)(1936: xxv).

[34] Gutmann (1845)(1936: xxv).

[35] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66).

[36] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66).

[37] Schelling (1845)(1936: 66).

[38] Franke (2005: 9). Shedd (1874-1890)(1980: 4 Volume 1).

[39] Admittedly they are non-exhaustive. This is a major reason why we have discussions in regard to theodicy as God is not crystal clear concerning the issue in Scripture.

[40] I personally relate to many of the objections raised against an all-powerful, good God in this world filled with evil. I simply reason God has perfect motives and a track record in Christ, whereas an atheist would have unbelief. This does not mean we do not share a mutual hatred of much evil and suffering.

[41] Flew (1955: 150-153).

[42] Mackie (1971) in Plantinga (1977)(2002: 32-33). Mackie (1955)(1996: 250-253).

BAUER, W. (1979) A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament, Translated by Eric H. Wahlstrom, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

FLEW, ANTONY (1955) ‘Theology and Falsification’, in Antony Flew and A. MacIntrye (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London, SCM, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

FOULKES, FRANCIS (1989) Ephesians, Grand Rapids, Inter-Varsity Press.

GUTMANN, JAMES (1845)(1936) ‘Introduction’ in SCHELLING, F.W.J. (1845)(1936) Schelling, Of Human Freedom, Translated by James Gutmann, The Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.

MACKIE, J.L. (1955)(1996) ‘Evil and Omnipotence’, in Mind, in Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger (eds.), Philosophy of Religion, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

MACKIE, J.L. (1971)(1977)(2002) ‘Evil and Omnipotence’, in The Philosophy of Religion, in Alvin C. Plantinga, God, Freedom, and Evil, Grand Rapids. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

SCHELLING, F.W.J. (1845)(1936) Schelling, Of Human Freedom, Translated by James Gutmann, The Open Court Publishing Company, Chicago.

SHEDD, WILLIAM G.T. (1874-1890)(1980) Dogmatic Theology, Volume 1, Nashville, Thomas Nelson Publishers.

STRONG, J. (1986) Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible, Pickering, Ontario, Welch Publishing Company.

THE GREEK NEW TESTAMENT (1993) Stuttgart, United Bible Societies.

THIESSEN, H.C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.


Pea green sea, Solva, Wales (trekearth.com)

Divinity student? Fundamentalist? Hmm

The University of Wales, Trinity Saint David

1. Dr. Russ Murray

September 3

This morning via the postgraduate department, my internal reviewer confirmed he agrees with the external reviewer that my post-viva PhD revisions are acceptable and that I have passed the PhD research thesis and am now a Doctor.

I will await the proper paperwork by regular mail, but email confirmation shall suffice for now.

This has been a long process for which I started with the University in 2004 and have gone through three advisors.

But it is a valuable degree with two stamps. The second stamp is from Wales, Trinity Saint David, which is a new University which is in existence by a merger with the University of Wales, Lampeter, and Trinity University College. I am currently with the Lampeter campus (distance learning), but actually started with Wales at Trinity University, although I have not physically been to the campus.

The merger has slowed up the processing of my Doctorate, but I am pleased with my result.

Trinity Saint David link



Rankings related to Wales, Lampeter, my campus.

Wales, Lampeter Rankings link

'May 2009

In the most recent Complete University Guide published in association with The Independent newspaper, the Department of Theology & Religious Studies at the University of Wales Lampeter was ranked 13th in the UK.'

'In December 2008, the Research Institute for Theology & Religious Studies was rated 9th in the UK for its research strength by Research Fortnight magazine in its RAE 2008 Analysis Power Rankings.'

'Then in February (2009), The Guardian newspaper placed the Department in first position in the UK for the number of postgraduate distance learning students.'

The first stamp is from The University of Wales in Cardiff. Wales is a series of accredited Universities, including Trinity Saint David and is affiliated with Cardiff University. With 100, 000 students the University of Wales would be one of the largest Universities in the United Kingdom.

My first advisor at Wales stated it was the second largest in the UK.

My thinking is that Wales, Lampeter has a high ranking on its own, and this should be boosted by the merger. So, with the second stamp from Wales, Trinity Saint David I have done well.

With the Wales first stamp it is less specific to my degree but the size of the institution does carry much credibility.

I started at Manchester, but this degree is just as valuable. I could have spent months working on passing a GRE (general knowledge test) and signed with Cambridge, but for Theology and Philosophy of Religion, although Cambridge is more famous than Wales, I doubt my CV would be boosted by a Cambridge degree over Wales. The level of work would be identical and Wales is very well-known in my field.

My preferences were London, Cambridge, Durham, Oxford, Wales, Edinburgh, Sheffield and Manchester and I received two research degrees from Wales, and so with God's help I succeeded.

University of Wales link



Now I can upgrade my Curriculum Vitae properly and start the process of looking for employment as a professor, worldwide. This will be much work.

Thanks for all the support, and comments appreciated if you feel so led.

2. Divinity student? Fundamentalist? Hmm

August 31

As some of you may have realized, as well as continuing my education in theology, philosophy of religion and Biblical studies, I also dabble with psychology. I actually took some psychology courses for my degrees.

Desiring a diverse education, I emailed a secular psychologist and businessman a few months ago. He was friendly, somewhat helpful, quite intelligent, and claimed to be so, having worked in special capacities for governments. Now, I basically admitted his greater knowledge and intelligence in some areas by writing him and asking for his advice, even though overall, his formal education was less than mine.

But, in many ways, so what, academic degrees represent types of intelligence in certain areas only.

Although he had some good advice, two major red flags came up in our dialogue.

Now please realize I have worked within secular Religious Studies academia for over ten years and so I have developed a sensitivity with certain semantics.

One, although I clearly pointed out, listing my degrees, I was working within a secular University within the fields of Theology and Philosophy of Religion, concerning theodicy and the problem of evil, he stated that I was a 'Divinity' student. This as opposed to acknowledging me as a Theologian, and Philosopher or more accurately a Philosopher of Religion. I also provided my links to my theology blogs.

Importantly for context, our discussion was in regard to relationships and perceived intelligence, including social and academic intelligence and associated success.

My education was not viewed by him as having notable social status.

Please note, I am not being egotistical here, I realize although I am not typical I suppose, I am an average man in many ways. Perhaps most ways. This post is not primarily about me, but about worldviews.

Now, I realize semantics can be tricky, but in my mind anyway, a 'Divinity' student can be a brilliant academic, and certainly there are ones I can learn from. But typically it is someone studying to be a pastor, church worker or perhaps missionary, which are generally less academic endeavours. I did attend Canadian Baptist Seminary at Trinity Western University but did not take the M.DIV degree, but did the MTS degree.

For example from Loyola, at the University of Chicago, it describes their M.DIV degree.

Chicago

'The Master of Divinity (M.Div.), is a comprehensive degree designed to meet the educational needs of persons called to professional ministerial leadership. Those who elect to pursue this Master of Divinity degree are making a major commitment to prepare for pastoral ministry, choosing to join in the adventure of discerning their gifts and preparing themselves for a life of religious leadership in an evolving church and society.'

From my academic experience, I reason this is a typical description of a M.DIV.

I am not criticizing the intellectual ability of persons taking this degree, but this type of degree is not generally as academic as the MTS, or more so secular MPhil or PhD research only degrees.

Did perhaps this psychologist, not know the difference? Quite likely to some degree, but the red flag comes from his overall downplaying of Religious Studies.

Therefore:

My reasoning is that he views even the higher degrees in Religious Studies as simply glorified Divinity degrees. In other words, Theology and Philosophy of Religion are intellectually secondary as academic disciplines.

So, I kindly corrected the gentleman and pointed out his mistake via email.

There was no answer...which is typical in that type of situation.

I am reading too much into his view? Perhaps. Well, let us go to point two.

Two, he stated I needed to change the type of people that I wished to associate with in certain ways. He claimed that I should avoid certain relationships with fundamentalist Christians, in content seemingly as if all Bible-believing Christians were stereotypical American fundamentalists. Within the context he wrote, he labelled the fundamentalists as being naive in certain aspects. He did not state I was a fundamentalist.

Now, I can admit, certainly some fundamentalists will be naive in certain ways, as will some non-fundamentalists, but the red flag came up in basically labelling all Bible-believing Christians as stereotypical fundamentalists.

C.T. McIntire states that fundamentalism is a movement that arose after World War One in the United States which attempted to reaffirm orthodox Protestant theology and defend it against liberal theology. McIntire (1996: 433). Since then the movement has diversified as has its meanings. McIntire (1996: 433). Connections are made to non-academics that are leaders, such as the now late Jerry Falwell, Tim La Haye, Hal Lindsey and Pat Robertson. McIntire (1996: 435).

Now, I can admit that I, and certain Christian persons I could have actual or potential relationships with would to certain degrees share some of the views of American fundamentalism.

But, in reality, I and many of the Christian persons I could have actual or potential relationships with, are not American fundamentalists.

With me for example:

I am not American.
I was not educated in American fundamentalist or Christian institutions.
My early Christian education was via moderate liberal Christian Sunday school.
I am an academic educated in Canadian Christian institutions of a moderate conservative nature and secular British Universities that would be moderately liberal.
I am not culturally an American fundamentalist, but by years of study I am Christian, Reformed, and Evangelical, although also not culturally American Reformed or Evangelical.
My degrees and my writing topics concerning theodicy, the problem of evil, the nature of God, non-conformity to certain aspects of cultural Christianity and the need for critical thinking clearly place me outside of American fundamentalism in many ways.
I am a moderate conservative.

Now, was the psychologist aware of much of this? No, not likely.

Therefore:

The assumption appears to be Theology and Philosophy of Religion Studies are largely at least, based in fundamentalism and that these disciplines and all Religious Studies are intellectually secondary as disciplines.

In the same reply that I dealt with the Divinity issue, I dealt with the fundamentalism issue and of course received no reply.

I am misreading his views? That is possible, yes. But in my time in the UK, I realized sitting in some meetings that North American religious studies of any conservative nature were primarily written-off as fundamentalist and evangelical and therefore academically lightweight.

The kind of work supposed 'Divinity' students would do.

I reason the kind and intelligent psychologist was basically reasoning the same thing.

MCINTIRE, C.T. (1996) ‘Fundamentalism’, in Walter A. Elwell (ed.), Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Books.

End

In this post are ten more of my favourite desktop photos from the last decade plus years.


Grand Canyon, Australia


Anse Couleuvre, France (trekearth.com)


Where is this?


Moezel, Germany (trekearth.com)


Fire Lake, BC (trekearth.com)


The University of Wales, Bangor. Where I earned my MPhil thesis degree. I have never set foot on campus or been in Bangor.


Cha Grande, Brazil (trekearth.com)


Bahia, Honda Bridge, South Florida (trekearth.com)


Maple Ridge, BC (thekingpin68)
My estate is on the right, Mr. Walter T. Franklin's house is down that road heading east.


Maple Ridge, BC (thekingpin68)
From my back window. Sometimes I pray while looking at that crooked Evergreen Tree. I am thinking of me, you, or both of us?;)