Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Pauline Texts: Location II (Non-exhaustive)

Italy: People & Countries, Facebook

Pauline Texts: Location II (Non-exhaustive)

Previously

January 8

Continued

First Thessalonians 

Dates (Earliest Pauline works with Galatians)

1 Thessalonians,  Robert Gundry, 50-51 A.D. (page 364).

2 Thessalonians,  Robert Gundry, 50-51 A.D. (page 364).

Galatians, Robert Gundry, 49 A.D. (page 364).

F. Roy Coad, 48-49 A.D. (page 1416).

Paul wrote the letter from Corinth. Dunnett (42).

Second Thessalonians

Corinth. Dunnett (42).

Galatians

Corinth. Dunnett (55).

Prison Epistles

Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
Philimon

Likely, Rome.

Biblica

Cited

'That Colossians is a genuine letter of Paul (1:1) is usually not disputed. In the early church, all who speak on the subject of authorship ascribe it to Paul. In the 19th century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted in ch. 2 was second-century Gnosticism. But a careful analysis of ch. 2 shows that the heresy referred to there is noticeably less developed than the Gnosticism of leading Gnostic teachers of the second and third centuries. Also, the seeds of what later became the full-blown Gnosticism of the second century were present in the first century and already making inroads into the churches.

Consequently, it is not necessary to date Colossians in the second century at a time too late for Paul to have written the letter. Instead, it is to be dated during Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome, where he spent at least two years under house arrest (see Ac 28:16–31). Some have argued that Paul wrote Colossians from Ephesus or Caesarea, but most of the evidence favors Rome as the place where Paul penned all the Prison Letters (Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians and Philemon). Colossians should be dated c. a.d. 60, in the same year as Ephesians and Philemon (see chart, p. 2261).'
---

Pastoral Epistles

First Timothy
Second Timothy
Titus

Debated locations.

Bible Hub.com: Pastoral Epistles

Cited

Schaff

pp.327-329.

Cited

'The Pauline Authorship.

'There never was a serious doubt as to the Pauline authorship of these Epistles till the nineteenth century, except among a few Gnostics in the second century.'

Cited

'But there are certain internal difficulties which have induced a number of modern critics to assign them all, or at least First Timothy, to a post-Pauline or pseudo-Pauline writer, who either changed and adapted Pauline originals to a later state of the church, or fabricated the whole in the interest of Catholic orthodoxy. In either case, the writer is credited with the best intentions and must not be judged according to the modern standard of literary honesty and literary property.'

Browning opines that the balance of evidence is that the Pastoral Epistles are pseudonymous. (184). As in supposed to be written under a false name.

Cited

Schaff:

'The objections against the Pauline authorship deserve serious consideration, and are as follows: (1) The impossibility of locating these Epistles in the recorded life of Paul; (2) the Gnostic heresy opposed; (3) the ecclesiastical organization implied; (4) the peculiarities of style and temper. If they are not genuine, Second Timothy must be the oldest, as it is least liable to these objections, and First Timothy and Titus are supposed to represent a later development. [1196]'

Cited

'The Pastoral Epistles, like Colossians, oppose the Gnostic heresy (gnosis pseudonumos,1 Tim.6:20) which arose in Asia Minor during his first Roman captivity, and appears more fully developed in Cerinthus, the contemporary of John. This was acknowledged by the early Fathers, Irenaeus and Tertullian, who used these very Epistles as Pauline testimonies against the Gnosticism of their day.'

Cited

'In conclusion, while we cannot be blind to certain difficulties, and may not be able, from want of knowledge of the precise situation of the writer, satisfactorily to explain them, we must insist that the prevailing evidence is in favor of the genuineness of these Epistles....'

Gnosticism may have very well been discussed in Colossians:

Colossians 2:16-19

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

16 Therefore no one is to [a]act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath [b]day— 17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the [c]substance [d]belongs to Christ. 18 Let no one keep [e]defrauding you of your prize by delighting in [f]self-abasement and the worship of the angels, [g]taking his stand on visions he has seen, [h]inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and [i]ligaments, grows with a growth [j]which is from God.

Oxford Biblical Studies Online

Browning

Cited

'Although Gnosticism was most fully manifest in the 2nd cent. CE, traces of it are already evident earlier, and some detect it as the false teaching which the epistle to the Colossians seems to reflect. '

'Along with visionary experiences Gnostics promoted an extreme asceticism and distrust of the material world, so that some scholars regard the epistle’s discouragement of self-abasement and the worship of angels (Col. 2: 18) and the concept of pleroma (Col. 1: 19) as references to Gnosticism. '

Some within scholarship suggest that the views of Judaizers may have been the Colossian heresy.

Possibly a combination of early Gnosticism and forms of Judaism?
---

I have noted previously on my websites that the Apostle Paul may have used a scribe (s) to write some of his later works. This would maintain the texts as obviously humanly different, but also Pauline and reasonably, inspired Scripture.

BIBLICA (2018) Colossians, Colorado Springs.
Biblica. https://www.biblica.com/resources/scholar-notes/niv-study-bible/intro-to-colossians/

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

COAD, F. ROY (1986) 'Galatians' in F.F. Bruce (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring the New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

SCHAFF,  PHILLIP (1882((2018) History of the Christian Church, Volume I,union Theological Seminary, New York. http://biblehub.com/library/schaff/history_of_the_christian_church_volume_i/section_99_the_pastoral_epistles.htm

Tuesday, January 09, 2018

Versus Hyper-Calvinism

North American wilderness (Not my photo)


Versus Hyper-Calvinism

Hyper-Calvinism: Michael Phillips, September 2005: Grace Baptist Church, Fremont, California

Early this morning, I discovered Mr. Phillips' lectures, which I find helpful. I consider myself Reformed and I agree with TULIP, but of course with my own educational background my interpretation is heavily influenced by bible, theology and philosophy of religion. My philosophical takes could lead to some misunderstandings with readers from time to time, I suppose.

I am not a Hyper-Calvinist and never have been. I would have significant disagreement with all the premises noted. I will comment on certain ones. The rest are covered by overall objections.

Further on Hyper-Calvinism from Monergism: Monergism.com

Cited

Most Calvinists reject as deplorable the following hyper-Calvinistic and destructive beliefs: 

- that God is the author of sin and of evil

This is admittedly tricky. I reason theologically and philosophically, God is the first/primary cause of all things, but submitting to Scripture in context, as James states:

James 1:13-15

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted [a]by God”; for God cannot be tempted [b]by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin [c]is accomplished, it brings forth death.

In the context of sin and evil, God as first/primary cause accurately needs to be understood as permitting sin and evil.

This is opposed to God forcing or coercing sin and evil (no human moral responsibility), or even demanding sin and evil (with human responsibility). Fallen human beings as a secondary cause embrace sin and evil. Demonic beings as secondary cause embrace human sin and evil, and indeed their own evil opposed to God.
 
- that men have no will of their own, and secondary causes are of no effect 

Again on this website, in comparison:

Compatibilism/Soft determinism

God is first/primary cause
Humanity is secondary cause

Determinism/Hard determinism

God is first/primary cause
---

I realize that soft determinism is under determinism in a sense, but in my MPhil/PhD and blogging, I have found that at times determinism and hard determinism are synonymously used terms.

- that the number of the elect at any time may be known by men 

- that it is wrong to evangelize 

The Holy Spirit can use calls for evangelism in a regeneration process. Preaching and biblical calls for repentance, for example.

- that assurance of election must be sought prior to repentance and faith

- that men who have once sincerely professed belief are saved regardless of what they later do 

- that God has chosen some races of men and has rejected others 

- that the children of unbelievers dying in infancy are certainly damned 

Within Hyper-Calvinism, this view, which I disagree with, paedobaptism in some cases may be viewed as a requirement for covenant membership and therefore salvation.

- that God does not command everyone to repent - that the sacraments are not means of grace, but obstacles to salvation by faith alone. 

- that the true church is only invisible, and salvation is not connected with the visible church

- that the Scriptures are intended to be interpreted by individuals only and not by the church.

- that no government is to be obeyed which does not acknowledge that Jesus is the Lord, or that Biblical Law is its source of authority

- that the grace of God does not work for the betterment of all men - that saving faith is equivalent to belief in the doctrine of predestination 

- that only Calvinists are Christians (Neo-gnostic Calvinism

Arminianism and Hyper-Calvinism were both among the historical errors battled by Charles Spurgeon, who was himself a 5-point Calvinist. He vigilantly fought these twin errors on both sides of the spectrum. One of Hyper-Calvinism's main errors is to declare that, because of God's sovereignty, we should not evangelize the lost. Spurgeon rejected such nonsense as do the large majority of people who would call themselves Calvinists today (such as R.C. Sproul, John Piper, John MacArthur, Alistair Begg and many others) We believe the doctrine of election should be declared strongly because the Bible does and because man's affections are enslaved to sin. He cannot save himself but needs the effectual working of the Holy Spirit if he is to have ears to hear when we preach the gospel. The preacher casts forth the seed of the gospel (the command to believe) indiscriminately but the Holy Spirit germinates the Word (so to speak) in the hearts of those he intends to save; i.e. those given to the Son by the Father in the eternal covenant made before time (John 6:37, 39, Eph 1, 4). Many Christian missionaries whom most would consider heroes held to the five point of Calvinism: William Carrey (he was opposed by a Hyper-Calvinist), Jonathan Edwards & David Brainard (missionaries to native Americans) just to name 3.

Quote: He cannot save himself but needs the effectual working of the Holy Spirit if he is to have ears to hear when we preach the gospel.  Agreed.

I have found that some within Hyper-Calvinism basically view God's chose of persons in election as arbitrary.

I certainly agree that person's do not save selves or have any work that contribute to salvation. Ephesians 1-2 documents election and salvation by grace through faith, not by works, but for good works, Romans 3 writes that none righteous, no one seeks God, no one does good. Romans 9 explains that God chooses based on his will. not human works or goodness, as good examples.

God through Jesus Christ, does have an everlasting purpose for the elect that he does not have for the non-elect. A human work (or any human ontological quality) does not save anyone, but God works
through the elect with an eternal (God) and everlasting (human) purpose.

Monday, January 08, 2018

Pauline Texts: Location I (Non-exhaustive)

Verona: People & Places/Facebook

Pauline Texts: Location I (Non-exhaustive)

I have presented a previous entry on scholarly views of New Testament chronology.

April 19 2013

Finding reliable information on the reasoned out locations where texts were written, has been a more difficult task. I shall review my academic library and online sources.

This takes much time to research, relative to the article size. Therefore, this will be accomplished in parts, God willing.

Romans

In The International Bible Commentary, Romans, entry Leslie C. Allen writes that during the winter of A.D. 56-57, in Corinth (Ancient Greece, my add).  Romans was probably written. (1316).

Bruce, not surprisingly, in his own Tyndale commentary, takes the same view. (13).

Browning reasons Romans was written in Corinth, probably 56-57 A.D. (325).

First Corinthians

Paul was likely in Ephesus (Ancient Greece, modern Turkey my add), when this letter was written, according to Browning (77). Marsh agrees (1348).

Fee reasons the letter was written in Ephesus at circa A.D. 53-55. (15).

Walter M. Dunnett explains 1 Corinthians was written from Ephesus. (49).

He cites 1 Corinthians 16: 7-9.

1 Corinthians 16:7-9

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

7 For I do not wish to see you now just in passing; for I hope to remain with you for some time, if the Lord permits. 8 But I will remain in Ephesus until Pentecost; 9 for a wide door [a]for effective service has opened to me, and there are many adversaries.

Second Corinthians

David J. A. Clines opines that Paul wrote 2 Corinthians from Macedonia (Ancient Greece, my add). (1389). Dunnet reasons the text probably came from Macedonia. (49).

He cites 2 Corinthians 7: 5-7. (49).

New American Standard Bible

5 For even when we came into Macedonia our flesh had no rest, but we were afflicted on every side: conflicts without, fears within. 6 But God, who comforts the [b]depressed, comforted us by the coming of Titus; 7 and not only by his coming, but also by the comfort with which he was comforted in you, as he reported to us your longing, your mourning, your zeal for me; so that I rejoiced even more.

Also, Dunnet cites, 2 Corinthians 2: 12-13.

My version again from the New American Standard Bible

2 Corinthians 2:12-13

New American Standard Bible

12 Now when I came to Troas for the gospel of Christ and when a door was opened for me in the Lord, 13 I had no rest for my spirit, not finding Titus my brother; but taking my leave of them, I went on to Macedonia.

Biblica

'DATE

The available evidence indicates that the year a.d. 55 is a reasonable estimate for the writing of this letter. From 1Co 16:5–8 it may be concluded that 1 Corinthians was written from Ephesus before Pentecost (in the late spring) and that 2 Corinthians may have been written later that same year before the onset of winter. 2Co 2:13; 7:5 indicate that it was probably written from Macedonia (see chart, p. 2261).'

ALLEN, LESLIE. C, in Bruce, F.F. (ed.), (1986), Romans, The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

BIBLICA (2018) 2 Corinthians, Colorado Springs, Biblica.
https://www.biblica.com/resources/scholar-notes/niv-study-bible/intro-to-2-corinthians/

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

BRUCE, F.F. (ed.), (1986) The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

BRUCE, F.F., (1963)(1996) Romans, Grand Rapids, IVP/Eerdmans.

CLINES, DAVID, J. A. (1986), 2 Corinthians, The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring the New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books.

FEE, GORDON (1987) The First Epistle to the Corinthians, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

MARSH, PAUL W. in Bruce, F.F. (ed.), (1986), First Corinthians, The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

Saturday, January 06, 2018

In Three Minutes: Birds of a Feather, Flock Together, Two

Stirling Castle: Wikipedia

Competency versus birds of a feather, flock together, two

Further in addition to the short and time limited video:

When I stated that someone may not fit in socially, this could mean that a more competent person does not socially relate, and/or a more competent person does not fit into social rules.

Relating socially is different than relating based on social rules. It is possible a person could relate socially, but not be acceptable based on social rules. The rejection of this type of person is ethically and philosophically problematic. It is also theologically problematic with strong Hebrew Bible and New Testament ethics on good human character being essential for proper human relationships. For example, the high ethical standards for overseers in 1 Timothy and Titus. As well, the Book of James demands a high level of ethics as it informs the believer not to favour the rich person over those that are not wealthy.

In the audio/video, I state that being relatable is often more important than being more competent. This does not imply agreement in each context...