Monday, March 20, 2023

Bullets: Brief philosophical reply to Bruce Arthur

Bullets: Brief philosophical reply to Bruce Arthur

• Image from IconsDB 

 • I have listened to Bruce Arthur over the years and appreciate much of his hockey commentary. 

• A brief philosophical reply to... 


• The LGBTQ community and Brian Burke deserved better from James Reimer: By Bruce Arthur Columnist Sun., March 19, 2023 
--- 

• Quoting Arthur: 'I feel bad for James Reimer. He’s had a decent NHL career, especially for someone from the tiny town of Morweena, Man. He was a sheltered evangelical Mennonite kid whose belief in Scripture was so profound that he would apologize to someone for saying unkind things about them in private; things that person would never have known about had Reimer not apologized. In his own words, Reimer believes in loving everyone. We should all aspire to that. But Reimer can’t quite get there, and it’s a shame.'

• Bruce, based on this story, how can you reasonably opine that Reimer is...

a) Sheltered?

b) Not loving everyone?

• Bruce, from the start here, philosophically, a person does not have to agree with the worldview and/or philosophy of another person, to love that person.

• As well, loving people with different worldviews and philosophies is a very New Testament perspective as well, as Jesus stated:

• English Standard Version (ESV) Matthew 5: 44 But I say to you, Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you...

• Quoting Reimer: “But the counter side, or the other side, is I just can’t publicly or personally endorse something that goes against my beliefs. That’s kind of where I’m at so far.” 

• Right. One should not publicly ethically and morally endorse a view he/she is opposed to.

• Quoting Arthur: 'Hockey is for everyone, they say, and in the NHL that includes bigots and it can’t be helped, or won’t, depending.'


• Quoting: Bigot: a person who has very strong, unreasonable beliefs or opinions about race, religion or politics and who will not listen to or accept the opinions of anyone who disagrees

• Bruce, who here is viewing the opinions of others as unreasonable?



• Quoting Reimer: “I strongly believe that every person has value and worth, and the LGBTQIA+ community, like all others, should be welcomed in all aspects of the game of hockey,” the statement concludes.

• But Bruce, based on your article, you seem displeased with Reimer publicly embracing his Christian worldview on this issue.

• Philosophically, Reimer here is not being a bigot.



• Quoting Arthur: Religion has been used as a skirt for bigotry for an awfully long time, and if you want to selectively pick from Biblical teachings, you’re allowed.

• Bruce, if you knew the Hebrew Bible and New Testament reasonably well, you would know that Reimer is taking a contextual, biblical, theological, philosophical, position.

• Add poor biblical reasoning to poor philosophical reasoning, on this issue, Bruce.

• Quoting Arthur: Jesus, of course, never mentioned homosexuality and preferred to hang out with society’s marginalized people, but some people choose a different version of their faith. Again, that’s their right.

• Bruce re: to selectively pick from Biblical teachings...

• Jesus chose Saul/Paul as an Apostle in Acts, Chapter 9.

• Paul is the key theological apostle in the New Testament...

• Sanctioned by God the Son (the resurrected Jesus Christ), God the Father and God the Holy Spirit, the Apostle Paul stated that homosexuality was sinful.
 
• From my website archives below...

• As I noted in my previous article on this subject, Romans 1:26-27 discusses the issue of homosexuality. James D.G. Dunn states that Paul's attitude to homosexual practice is unambiguous. Dunn (1988: 74). For Paul this practice is a passion not worthy of respect and is unnatural. Dunn (1988: 74). 

 • Cranfield notes from the Biblical text an abandonment of natural intercourse with the opposite sex, for same sex intercourse. Cranfield writes that Paul is explaining that homosexual acts are contrary to nature and the creator's intention. Cranfield (1992: 35). It is perversion that is condemned. Cranfield (1992: 36). 

• Mounce states that Paul views homosexual practice as shameful, unnatural, indecent, and a perversion. Mounce (1995: 82). Mounce traces it back to the Old Testament condemnation in Leviticus 18:22. Mounce (1995: 82-33). Mounce further writes that in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, Paul notes that homosexual offenders will not be allowed to enter the Kingdom of God. Mounce (1995: 82-83). These offenders are 'soft ones' who allow themselves to be used as women. Mounce (1995: 83). Mounce makes the very reasonable deduction that there is no room for the allowance in the Christian Church of homosexual practice since it is clearly condemned in both Testaments. Mounce (1995: 82-83). 

• Quoting Arthur: Indeed, Reimer’s confused explanation of how he couldn’t wear an Islamic-themed jersey despite being a friend of former Leafs teammate Nazem Kadri showed a man who has chosen a fundamental and fundamentalist insularity.

• No Bruce, Reimer is not confused here.

• Reimer is a man that is demonstrating philosophical and religious, worldview consistency and integrity.

• Reimer is not obliged to wear any jersey that embraces a philosophy and/or religious worldview, such as Islam, that he does not agree with it.

 • Obviously, a person can be friends with someone of another worldview without embracing that worldview.

• The gospel message includes the theology that divine regeneration (John 3, Titus 3, 1 Peter 1) enlightens the human being. 

• All humanity being universally sinful, homosexual or not.

• In regeneration to instead embrace the applied atoning and resurrection work of Jesus Christ for salvation, while turning from sin, by grace through faith, alone.

---

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 2: God and Creation, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 3: Sin and Salvation in Christ, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book II, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College.

CALVIN, JOHN (1539)(1998) The Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book IV, Translated by Henry Beveridge, Grand Rapids, The Christian Classic Ethereal Library, Wheaton College. 

CALVIN, JOHN (1543)(1996) The Bondage and Liberation of the Will, Translated by G.I. Davies, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

CRANFIELD, C.E.B. (1992) Romans: A Shorter Commentary, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

DUNN, JAMES D.G. (1988) Romans, Dallas, Word Books 

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids.

KIERKEGAARD, SOREN (1847-1848)(1955)(1966) On Authority and Revelation, Translated by Walter Lowrie, New York, Harper and Row, Publishers, Incorporated.

KIERKEGAARD, SOREN (1848-1849)(1961) Christian Discourses & The Lilies of the Field and The Birds of the Air & Three Discourses at The Communion on Fridays, Translated by Walter Lowrie, New York, Oxford University Press. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1995) The New American Commentary: Romans, Nashville, Broadman & Holman Publishers.

MURRAY, JOHN (1937-1966)(1977) Collected Writings of John Murray, Vol. 2: Select Lectures in Systematic Theology, Edinburgh, The Banner of Truth Trust. 

THIESSEN, HENRY C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

WEBER, OTTO (1955)(1981) Foundations of Dogmatics, Volumes 1 and 2, Translated and annotated by Darrell L. Guder, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

Posted by at No comments:

Saturday, March 11, 2023

Jürgen Moltmann (PhD Edit)

Barcelona-trekearth

Jürgen Moltmann (PhD Edit)

Originally published on June 13, 2013, this article was missing the footnotes. To repair, I tried copying and pasting today and with the first few attempts there were no footnotes, but eventually I found a fix. This article features PhD Edits citing Jürgen Moltmann from my Doctoral thesis. 

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter  

The Incarnation 

Jürgen Moltmann (1993) admits there is a mystery in regard to Christ and his incarnation.[1]  There is a mysterious incarnation of God into a reality that is ‘temporal, decaying, transitory existence in which men live and die.’[2]  The eternal presence of God somehow in the incarnation exists among persons as God takes on ‘transitory, mortal being’ in order to become and cause humanity to become ‘intransitory’[3] and immortal, never facing death once again.[4]  The New Testament depicts Christ as full deity with full divine power, and at the same time presents him as having the results of human finitude and mortality.[5]  His deity should not be asserted in a way that negates his humanity and vice-versa.[6]  Christ is equal to the Father in essence and nature as God,[7] and yet as human being he submitted to the Father in order to accomplish his earthly mission. Jesus Christ has a determination to be God, our God, and to be the reconciler of the world.[8] According to Moltmann, through the history of the crucified and risen Christ, lies the consummation of the Kingdom of God that sets things free and provides them with meaning.[9] Moltmann (1993) explains that Jesus Christ is the image of the invisible God[10] and is of one substance with God, not being created.[11]  For Moltmann, Jesus was the eternal presence of God among humanity.[12]

Atheism 

Jürgen Moltmann reasons that metaphysical atheism sees an unjust and absurd world where the problem of evil is triumphant.[13]  The atheist does not view God as showing favour to the world,[14] but views reality as one of nothingness.[15]  Moltmann explains that philosophical arguments for the existence of God will not convince these atheists because the devil is a more plausible cause of this evil world than is God.[16]  Motlmann’s explanation of metaphysical atheism could challenge Feinberg’s claim that God would not annihilate the world because God has good ultimate purposes to fulfill.[17]   These complaints tie in with Griffin’s idea that the Calvinist God would be immoral or amoral if he existed because of the evil within creation.[18]  The atheistic critic may claim there is no evidence that God, contrary to Feinberg’s notion, has eventual good plans for his creation,[19] but Moltmann writes Christ in his work on the cross shows that God’s being is in suffering and suffering is in God’s being.[20]  The idea that God is love is demonstrated through Christ’s work on the cross.[21]  Moltmann makes a fine point as ultimately if Feinberg’s claim concerning God’s future good plans make any sense, God must be shown within his creation to have acted in a positive loving way[22] to rid the creation of the problem of evil and the atoning work of Christ, and the resurrection is reasonable explanation of God’s plans. 

The Resurrection

Jürgen Moltmann writes that as the crucified one, the risen Christ is available for humanity.[23] Moltmann explains to some the resurrection of Christ is a counter to the abandonment of humanity of God while Christ was on the cross.[24]  For certain observers Christ’s resurrection for all turns them from atheism.[25]  This may be because the historical resurrection of Christ would be viewed as God actually participating in the world to remedy the problem of evil.[26]  God would not only be judging the world as he did on the cross,[27] but actually bringing about resolution to the problem of evil through Christ[28] and from a human perspective this makes a belief and trust in the Biblical God reasonable and worthwhile.  Moltmann writes that after the resurrection the risen Christ appeared to his followers in order to guarantee that the glory of God and his creation would occur in the not too distance future.[29] 

Moltmann writes that the resurrection message of the early Christian community was the anticipation of what was to come.[30]  The resurrection of Christ created the hope for the eventual world of a new righteousness.[31]  In the new heaven and new earth, the life of the believer will be transformed in completion.[32]  Believers will share the likeness of God,[33] and this will be a life of moral perfection. 

Symbols

According to Eric Vossen (1993), Jürgen Moltmann, has had major influence in the development of theodicy concepts and symbols.[34]  Moltmann appears to be commenting on this issue when he asks if the fatal problems of modern humanity will be apprehended and solved with critical interaction with the gospel,[35] or will other sources, that are less problematic, be sought.[36]  It seems that Christian ministers and leaders must provide theoretically sound explanations for evil and suffering, and provide practical ways for the God of the Bible to be of comfort.[37]  As sufferers seek the power of the gospel, these persons must have something tangible to rely on for support.[38]  If Christianity and the gospel is seen as theoretically and practically corrupt and useless,[39] then the Church may be rejected as an option for providing the explanation for evil and suffering.[40] 

___________________________________

[1] Moltmann (1993: 88). Christ has two natures in one person and there is an attempt to correlate the human and divine in Christ, but it remains a mystery. Whale (1958: 105).

[2] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[3] Moltmann (1993: 88).  Lasting forever.

[4] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[5] Franke (2005: 72).

[6] Franke (2005: 72).

[7] Bavinck (1918)(2006 : 276 Volume 2).  Barth (1932-1968: 371). 

[8] Williams (2007: 130).

[9] Moltmann (1993: 338).

[10] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[11] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[12] Moltmann (1993: 88).

[13] Moltmann (1993: 219-220).  Suffering is not undone.  Phillips (2005: 273).

[14] Moltmann (1993: 219-220).  Phillips (2005: 273).

[15] Moltmann (1993: 219-220).

[16] Moltmann (1993: 220-221).  And because these arguments are not empirically based.  Flew (1983)(1996: 92). 

[17] Feinberg (1994: 131).

[18] Griffin (1976: 116-130).

[19] Flew (1983)(1996: 92). 

[20] Moltmann (1993: 227).

[21] Moltmann (1993: 227).

[22] Moltmann (1993: 227).

[23] Moltmann (1993: 195).

[24] Moltmann (1993: 195).

[25] Moltmann (1993: 195).

[26] Others such as Darrow, Phillips, and Flew would be very skeptical of this concept.  Phillips (2005: 247-275).  Darrow (1928)(1973: 266-267).  Flew (1983)(1996: 92).  If one does not believe in the resurrection of Christ, God’s key witness to the world that he wishes to save it from the problem of evil is gone.  The remedy to sin and death would be non-existent and therefore concepts of a perfected world far-fetched.

[27] Moltmann (1993: 195).

[28] Moltmann (1993: 195).

[29] Moltmann (1993: 178).

[30] Moltmann (1993: 177). 

[31] Moltmann (1993: 177).

[32] Mounce (1990: 388). 

[33] Mounce (1990: 388). 

[34] Vossen (1993: 21).

[35] Moltmann (1993: 9).

[36] Moltmann (1993: 9).

[37] Ballard and Pritchard (2001: 5).  Pattison in Woodward and Pattison (2000)(2007: 137).

[38] Browning (1985)(2005: 2).

[39] Moltmann (1993: 9).

[40] Moltmann (1993: 9).

 __________________________________

BARTH, KARL (1932-1968) Church Dogmatics,  The Doctrine of the Word of God: Volume 1, Part One, Translated by J.W. Edwards, Rev. O. Bussey, and Rev. Harold Knight, Edinburgh, T. and T. Clark. 

BARTH, KARL (1932-1968) Church Dogmatics, The Doctrine of Creation: Volumes 1 and 3.  Translated by J.W. Edwards, Rev. O. Bussey, and Rev. Harold Knight, Edinburgh, T. and T. Clark. 

BARTH, KARL (1932-1968) Church Dogmatics, The Doctrine of God: Volume 2, First Half -Volume, Translated by J.W. Edwards, Rev. O. Bussey, and Rev. Harold Knight, Edinburgh, T. and T. Clark. 

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 2: God and Creation, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

BAVINCK, HERMAN (1918)(2006) Reformed Dogmatics Volume 3: Sin and Salvation in Christ, John Bolt (gen.ed.), Translated by John Vriend, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

DARROW, CLARENCE (1928)(1973) ‘The Myth of the Soul’, in The Forum, October, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press.

DARROW, CLARENCE (1932)(1973) ‘The Delusion of Design and Purpose’, in The Story of My Life,  October, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press. 

DAVIES, BRIAN (1999) ‘Impassibility’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, p. 288. Kent, SCM Press Ltd. 

FEINBERG, JOHN S. (1994) The Many Faces of Evil, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House. 

FLEW, ANTONY (1955) ‘Theology and Falsification’, in Antony Flew and A. MacIntrye (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, London, SCM, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press. 

FLEW, ANTONY (1983)(1996) ‘The Falsification Challenge’, in Antony Flew and A. MacIntrye (eds.), New Essays in Philosophical Theology, in Michael Peterson, William Hasker, Bruce Reichenbach, and David Basinger (eds.), Philosophy of Religion, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

FLEW, ANTONY, R.M. HARE, AND BASIL MITCHELL (1996) ‘The Debate on the Rationality of Religious Belief’, in L.P. Pojman (ed.),Philosophy, The Quest for Truth, New York, Wadsworth Publishing Company. 

FLEW, ANTONY AND A.MACINTRYE (1999) ‘Philosophy of Religion’, in Alan Richardson and  John Bowden (eds.), A New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd. 

GRIFFIN, DAVID RAY (1976) God, Power, and Evil, Philadelphia, The Westminster Press. 

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

MOLTMANN, JÜRGEN (1993) The Crucified God, Minneapolis, Fortress Press. 

MOLTMANN, JÜRGEN (1999) ‘Perseverance’, in Alan Richardson and John Bowden (eds.), New Dictionary of Christian Theology, Kent, SCM Press Ltd. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

PHILLIPS, D.Z. (1981) Encountering Evil, Stephen T. Davis (ed.),  Atlanta, John Knox Press. 

PHILLIPS, D.Z. (2005)  The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God, Fortress Press, Minneapolis. 

VOSSEN, H.J.M. ERIC (1993) ‘Images of God and Coping with Suffering’, Translated by S. Ralston, in Journal of Empirical Theology, Volume 6, pp. 19-38. Kampen, The Netherlands, Journal of Empirical Theology.

WHALE, J.S. (1958) Christian Doctrine, Glasgow, Fontana Books.
Posted by at 31 comments:

Friday, January 20, 2023

Briefly on jersey boycotts: Philosophical comments

Briefly on jersey boycotts: Philosophical comments

Photo: Capture from ESPN

Citations in italics


NHL player's boycott of team's Pride night tribute 'disrespectful' to gay community: agent

Philosophically, I suppose that in regards to job security and job harmony, there can be a pragmatic debate on whether or not each player should agree to wear each and every themed uniform in the warmups.

Ivan Provorov's actions show league not 'safe environment' for players to come out, agent Bayne Pettinger says 

I am not a hockey insider and so I cannot reasonably opine on this point from the agent. However, within society, overall, I do not think that one player's boycott in this context, creates an unsafe environment for those within the LGBTQ+ community. Clearly the LGBTQ+ community has significant societal support in 2023 within the western world. Especially from within government, the media, academia and the corporate world.

A hockey agent says an NHL player's refusal to take part in his team's LGBTQ+ Pride Night warmup is an indication that more work needs to be done to make the sport more inclusive.

To the agent...

Sir, the western world is still at this point a democracy. There is never 100% public (or private) agreement on any issue. Public agreement should not be socially forced or coerced, as long as legally, reasonably, law and order is maintained within a democracy. In the west, we can eventually, favour forms of tyranny and dictatorship and make it seem like everyone agrees on every key societal issue, at least. But this will just force real disagreement into forms of silence. It will not eliminate all disagreement.

Philadelphia Flyers defenceman Ivan Provorov did not participate in pre-game warmups Tuesday night when the team wore Pride-themed jerseys and used sticks wrapped in rainbow Pride tape.  He cited his Russian Orthodox religion as the reason. "I respect everybody's choices," Provorov said after the game. "My choice is to stay true to myself and my religion. That's all I'm going to say."' '

Again, in regards to job security and job harmony, pragmatically, I will state that there can be a philosophical, ethical debate on whether or not each player should agree to wear each and every themed uniform in the warmups. However, I think this player has every right to hold to his Russian Orthodox religious views. His views which do not personally support the Pride event, also do not prohibit the event from occurring, whatsoever. As well, public support for the event still exists.

'Bayne Pettinger, a Toronto-based NHLPA certified player agent who came out as gay in 2020, said he was disappointed by Provorov's decision to use his platform for "essentially a protest" that sends a message to hockey fans and his teammates who did take part in the warmup. "[It] just says that, 'Hey, it's making it about me,'" Pettinger told CBC's All Points West. "I found it selfish and frankly disrespectful towards the the gay community."

The player has the right to be concerned with self, as we all do, within the context of a democracy and within reasonable law and order. The issue is also about the player's rights and freedoms. In a democracy the player should not have to agree with every idea and political cause that the agent, or anyone else holds to.

Pettinger agrees that more conversations are needed. "I'm a strong believer that no one is born to hate another group or religion or race, that's taught," he said. "We can't put ourselves in Provorov's shoes of how he was raised and his beliefs. We can only try to educate and humanize."

Sir, I do not personally hold to Russian Orthodoxy, Greek Orthodoxy, or any form of Eastern Orthodoxy. However, I have studied Orthodoxy, especially through the use of...

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy,Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

To the agent...

More conversations?

Are these somewhat at least, open-minded conversations, or are these actually desired indoctrinations into your way of thinking?

There is nothing in what the hockey player did to suggest 'hate', whatsoever. What exists is a worldview difference in regards to him publicly wearing a Pride uniform in support of the LGBTQ+ community. 

Sir, since you disagree with this player's stance. Does this therefore mean you hate Russian Orthodoxy? Do you hate his worldview?

Reason actually tells us that differing views on an issue, including this issue, and different worldviews, do not necessarily imply or indicate 'hate', by either side.

Why is it not simply reasonable to disagree on an issue?

Educate? 

Alright, let us become more educated...

Sir, are you educated in the beliefs of Russian Orthodoxy? We in the west, see LGBTQ+ education all around us.

Does Orthodoxy have any philosophical, intellectual merit? Can you opine with knowledge? Has the player simply been raised with these beliefs, or has he actually researched them? Is his understanding reasonable?

Again, I am not an adherent of any form of Eastern Orthodoxy, but although I have a biblical Christian worldview within the Reformed Christian tradition; I certainly do not assume that those within Russian Orthodoxy, by default, dehumanize outsiders. 

In this case, the hockey player expressed his Russian Orthodox religion as the reason for non-support of the Pride jersey. 

"I respect everybody's choices," Provorov said after the game. "My choice is to stay true to myself and my religion. That's all I'm going to say."' '

The player showed respect for  a different view and worldview, although within disagreement. This is not hatred. This is not dehumanizing, whatsoever.


Associated Press 

PHILADELPHIA -- Flyers coach John Tortorella defended Russian defenseman Ivan Provorov's decision to cite religious beliefs as his reason to boycott the team's pregame Pride celebration. "Provy did nothing wrong," Tortorella said Thursday. "Just because you don't agree with his decision doesn't mean he did anything wrong."

Well-stated...

Posted by at No comments:

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

Happy 2023: Brief bullets on career/confidence

• Hotel del mar by @the_line_visualization [IG] January 4 2023, from LinkedIn

• Quite the hotel...
---

• Besides basic training, I now have two main work disciplines completed, course wise.

• I am now quite good at the first discipline, and I am improving with the second.

• It is a good career, as with government there are various departments I could transfer to, as I gain experience and status.

• This is completing over 60 self-directed online courses since late September...

• And then the real, career work is the actual, real data processing.

• Time will tell whether I relocate eventually.

• Most likely, not a permeant relocation, but work travel, as I am in good financial shape with my condominium, etcetera, by God's grace.
---

• In regards to the TikTok video below, IMHO, a significant reason there are so many negatives with romantic relationships in 2023, particularity in the western world, is the philosophical idea of what we 'deserve'.

• I do not deserve a potential wife with a PhD, because I have a PhD.

• I do not deserve a potential wife that is significantly blessed within some academic discipline.

• No one deserves a potential romantic partner based on his/her youth, looks and overall attractiveness.

• No one deserves a potential romantic partner based on age, lack of looks and lack of overall attractiveness.

• Clearly with the attitudes of many in today's western world, much of his/her worldview embraces the idea that a person should seek out, and only be presented with, what they deserve, romantically.

• To be presented with less than what is supposedly deserve, can be viewed as an offence.

• This can be a shunning offence...

• However, based on a New Testament worldview, as the regenerate (John 2, Titus 2, 1 Peter 1) are saved by grace through alone (Ephesians 1-2 as example), everyone is a universally sinful person (Romans, Galatians, Hebrews, as examples).

• Each and every person is not deserving of God's blessing of abundant life.

• Certainly, would not, a good romantic partner be an aspect of abundant life?

• I suggest that any concept of 'deserve' should be dropped within romantic considerations.

• Instead within the gospel, a single person without a gift of contentment (1 Corinthians 7) should seek mutual spiritual, intellectual and romantic/physical attraction.

• In other words, reasonably, prayerfully, within the Christian community, but not perfectly, the spiritual, intellectual and romantic/physical needs are mutually met.

• I suggest, that people considered for a potential romantic relationship under the philosophical, worldview umbrella of what we 'deserve' would at times differ VASTLY, from people considered within the concepts of significant, but not perfect, mutual, spiritual, intellectual and romantic/physical attraction.


• The young woman speaking on the TikTok video.

• (Paraphrased) Sometimes short guys have too much confidence. 

• Typically, most men, even under six feet tall would still be taller than she appears.

• To be blunt, she is an average, at best, looking young adult woman.

• Her attitude is very unattractive, IMHO.

• In regards to male confidence...

• Many men lack confidence that a western woman will choose him romantically.

• The female 'group think' mentality is a negative consideration for a man...

• This however, does not necessarily equate to a man that is overall, lacking confidence.

• The presenter, confidently presents his material.

• The presenter, confidently makes some good points.

• The man seemingly has some significant value (I know little about him).
---

• A person's overall value, as a Christian, or potential husband or wife, is not measured by what a person deserves.

• But instead, by the significance of any mutual attraction.

• Love (and equally truth) is key here as opposed to a market value dating approach...

• Galatians 5:14 NASB2020 For the whole Law is fulfilled in one word, in the statement, “YOU SHALL LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF.” NASB2020: New American Standard Bible - NASB

Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)