Wednesday, April 15, 2020

You are welcome

This pandemic is an ideal time to call, email or message people and suggest that you would ‘love’ to get together with them, but obviously cannot at this time and probably cannot for months.

When this pandemic ends, you can suggest that you wanted to get together earlier but are now too busy because you have urgent post-pandemic, apocalyptic life catch up to do.

This probably provides days, weeks, months, or years, 'buffer', depending on the person or persons under consideration.

 You are welcome.

@Bobby Buff

---

Sigh...it goes on and on.

Facebook has in error blocked my second Blogger website, Satire Und Theology from posting entries on my Facebook business page, Russell Norman Murray, PhD. Facebook falsely claims I violated community standards with a recent entry where Kenneth Copeland is on a YouTube video stating...

Quote: The Devil's tryin' to give me the flu

Further, the Blogger entry and the associated Facebook entry contained the following comments from me:

Presumptive theology in regards to God, Satanic beings and humanity, and making money in the process.
---

Obviously, my entry was not supporting Kenneth Copeland's claim.

I have made four requests from Facebook for clarification regarding community standards. No reply.

Therefore I publish this entry on this website that can be posted on my Facebook business page.

Tuesday, April 14, 2020

Safety issues at this lab

Stock photo
I heard this story on CNN today

I chose a less clear title to avoid another possible censorship blunder from Facebook Community Standards.

Washington Post: By Josh Rogin Columnist covering foreign policy and national security April 14, 2020, at 3:00 a.m. PDT

Cited

Global Opinions

State Department cables warned of safety issues at Wuhan lab studying bat coronaviruses

Cited

Two years before the novel coronavirus pandemic upended the world, U.S. Embassy officials visited a Chinese research facility in the city of Wuhan several times and sent two official warnings back to Washington about inadequate safety at the lab, which was conducting risky studies on coronaviruses from bats. The cables have fueled discussions inside the U.S. government about whether this or another Wuhan lab was the source of the virus — even though conclusive proof has yet to emerge.

I acknowledge that coronavirus (es) is (are) found in nature...

COVID-19 coronavirus epidemic has a natural origin: March 17, 2020: Scripps Research Institute

Cited

Possible origins of the virus 

Based on their genomic sequencing analysis, Andersen and his collaborators concluded that the most likely origins for SARS-CoV-2 followed one of two possible scenarios. 

In one scenario, the virus evolved to its current pathogenic (capable of causing disease, my add) state through natural selection in a non-human host and then jumped to humans.

Cited

In the other proposed scenario, a non-pathogenic (not capable of causing diseases, my add) version of the virus jumped from an animal host into humans and then evolved to its current pathogenic state within the human population.

Back to the Washington Post article...

Cited

In January 2018, the U.S. Embassy in Beijing took the unusual step of repeatedly sending U.S. science diplomats to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which had in 2015 become China’s first laboratory to achieve the highest level of international bioresearch safety (known as BSL-4). WIV issued a news release in English about the last of these visits, which occurred on March 27, 2018. The U.S. delegation was led by Jamison Fouss, the consul general in Wuhan, and Rick Switzer, the embassy’s counselor of environment, science, technology and health. Last week, WIV erased that statement from its website, though it remains archived on the Internet.

'Last week, WIV erased that statement from its website, though it remains archived on the Internet.'

Why was this key visit from the US Embassy, science diplomats and the related statement erased by WIV?

Cited

What the U.S. officials learned during their visits concerned them so much that they dispatched two diplomatic cables categorized as Sensitive But Unclassified back to Washington. The cables warned about safety and management weaknesses at the WIV lab and proposed more attention and help. The first cable, which I obtained, also warns that the lab’s work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic. 

Cited

'During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, they noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory,” states the Jan. 19, 2018, cable...'

There was a lack of trained technicians and investigators...

Cited

As many have pointed out, there is no evidence that the virus now plaguing the world was engineered; scientists largely agree it came from animals. But that is not the same as saying it didn’t come from the lab, which spent years testing bat coronaviruses in animals, said Xiao Qiang, a research scientist at the School of Information at the University of California at Berkeley.

I accept as presently reasonable and probable, there is no significant evidence that COVID-19 was engineered in some way by Chinese scientists, as the scientific consensus is that it came from animals within nature.

A level of scientific engineering of COVID-19, as China is a Communist country, in competition with western democratic nations, especially economically, is not beyond a reasonable possibility.

To be clear, this is opposed to a reasonable probability.

I will side with scientists that state, based on present evidence, that COVID-19, being within nature and animals, was not a specifically, designed virus and weapon of sorts to disrupt the world economy; and western economies. With a significant number of deaths being part of the plan.

Cited

There are similar concerns about the nearby Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention lab, which operates at biosecurity level 2, a level significantly less secure than the level-4 standard claimed by the Wuhan Insititute of Virology lab, Xiao said. That’s important because the Chinese government still refuses to answer basic questions about the origin of the novel coronavirus while suppressing any attempts to examine whether either lab was involved.

Granted, China is a totalitarian country under Communism, with heavy government use of propaganda, but the lack of transparency is a red flag. Why cannot the truth be told?

Cited

As my colleague David Ignatius noted, the Chinese government’s original story — that the virus emerged from a seafood market in Wuhan — is shaky. Research by Chinese experts published in the Lancet in January showed the first known patient, identified on Dec. 1, had no connection to the market, nor did more than one-third of the cases in the first large cluster. Also, the market didn’t sell bats.

A shaky origins story. The true origins of the virus would, it appears, may make China publicly look bad, regardless of the actual truth. Possibly, being scientifically incompetent in regards to their research of COVID-19 in the Wuhan lab under review.

Cited

The Chinese government, meanwhile, has put a total lockdown on information related to the virus origins. Beijing has yet to provide U.S. experts with samples of the novel coronavirus collected from the earliest cases. The Shanghai lab that published the novel coronavirus genome on Jan. 11 was quickly shut down by authorities for “rectification.” Several of the doctors and journalists who reported on the spread early on have disappeared.

Doctors and journalists that have disappeared. What truth is so sensitive to this dictatorship to resort to such extreme measures?

End
---

Tweak Town: Chinese phone operators lose 21 million subscribers over COVID-19 coronavirus outbreak by Anthony Garreffa | Mar 29, 2020, at 07:07 pm CDT

Sunday, April 12, 2020

The Trinity & Easter: Briefly

The Trinity & Easter: Briefly

April 12, 2020

Searching my website archives, I have not previously presented this section of my Doctoral thesis as the original block paragraph. Theologically, the Trinity is essential for Jesus Christ’s death on the cross leading to his atoning and resurrection work applied to regenerated, enlightened, justified believers. The Trinity is relevant to this and every Easter that celebrates the risen Christ.

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter

Franke reasons the Trinity is a method of self-disclosure of God to and within creation.[1]  It is centrally concerned with the coming of Christ and his work, and the work of the Holy Spirit and the concept of everlasting life for believers.[2]  Jesus Christ in his atoning work was not only a man,[3] although he did take upon himself full humanity.[4]  His atoning death was that of a God- man[5] that can save those that a mere man or creature could not.[6]  The Trinity, therefore, takes on philosophical importance within human salvation.[7]  Both Christ’s humanity and deity played central roles in his atoning work[8] and resurrection.[9]

BOWMAN, ROBERT M. (1990) Why You Should Believe in the Trinity, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

HUGHES, PHILIP, EDGCUMBE (1990) A Commentary On The Epistle To The Hebrews, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

SCHRECK, ALAN (1984) Catholic and Christian, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Servant Books.

THIESSEN, HENRY C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.  



[1] Franke (2005: 65). 
[2] Franke (2005: 65).
[3] Christ was incarnate and not a creature created by God.  Bowman (1990: 19).
[4] Bowman (1990: 19).  Thiessen (1956: 299).  Hughes (1990: 55).
[5] Bowman (1990: 19).  Christ remained an incarnated true man even as he was resurrected immortal.  Hughes (1990: 55).
[6] Bowman (1990: 19-20).  A mere human being could not accomplish the mission and work Christ did. Schreck (1984: 16).
[7] Bowman (1990: 19-20).
[8] Bowman (1990: 19-20).
[9] Hughes (1990: 55).

Bad hair months?




Bad hair months?

Pops is really starting to look like Bernie Sanders...

Also, as like in the 1970s, when I was little, my hair is starting to bother me when I can feel it on my forehead. More time needs to be spent with the tap and a comb.

I could go to the 'summer dome' route, similar to 'permanent domes' such as my big brother, in Arizona, Chuckles the Red Skull and John the Rage, but I choose not to. I certainly would look even more like Marvel's Kingpin at that point.
---

This is generally, not my preferred type of post for this website.

Facebook has in error blocked my second Blogger website, Satire Und Theology from posting entries on my Facebook business page, Russell Norman Murray, PhD. Facebook falsely claims I violated community standards with a recent entry where Kenneth Copeland is on a YouTube video stating...

Quote: The Devil's tryin' to give me the flu

Further, the Blogger entry and the associated Facebook entry contained the following comments from me:

Presumptive theology in regards to God, Satanic beings and humanity, and making money in the process.
---

Obviously, my entry was not supporting Kenneth Copeland's claim.

I have made four requests from Facebook for clarification regarding community standards. No reply.

Therefore I publish this entry on this website in order to post on my Facebook business page.