Sunday, April 12, 2020

The Trinity & Easter: Briefly

The Trinity & Easter: Briefly

April 12, 2020

Searching my website archives, I have not previously presented this section of my Doctoral thesis as the original block paragraph. Theologically, the Trinity is essential for Jesus Christ’s death on the cross leading to his atoning and resurrection work applied to regenerated, enlightened, justified believers. The Trinity is relevant to this and every Easter that celebrates the risen Christ.

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter

Franke reasons the Trinity is a method of self-disclosure of God to and within creation.[1]  It is centrally concerned with the coming of Christ and his work, and the work of the Holy Spirit and the concept of everlasting life for believers.[2]  Jesus Christ in his atoning work was not only a man,[3] although he did take upon himself full humanity.[4]  His atoning death was that of a God- man[5] that can save those that a mere man or creature could not.[6]  The Trinity, therefore, takes on philosophical importance within human salvation.[7]  Both Christ’s humanity and deity played central roles in his atoning work[8] and resurrection.[9]

BOWMAN, ROBERT M. (1990) Why You Should Believe in the Trinity, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

HUGHES, PHILIP, EDGCUMBE (1990) A Commentary On The Epistle To The Hebrews, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

SCHRECK, ALAN (1984) Catholic and Christian, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Servant Books.

THIESSEN, HENRY C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.  



[1] Franke (2005: 65). 
[2] Franke (2005: 65).
[3] Christ was incarnate and not a creature created by God.  Bowman (1990: 19).
[4] Bowman (1990: 19).  Thiessen (1956: 299).  Hughes (1990: 55).
[5] Bowman (1990: 19).  Christ remained an incarnated true man even as he was resurrected immortal.  Hughes (1990: 55).
[6] Bowman (1990: 19-20).  A mere human being could not accomplish the mission and work Christ did. Schreck (1984: 16).
[7] Bowman (1990: 19-20).
[8] Bowman (1990: 19-20).
[9] Hughes (1990: 55).

Bad hair months?




Bad hair months?

Pops is really starting to look like Bernie Sanders...

Also, as like in the 1970s, when I was little, my hair is starting to bother me when I can feel it on my forehead. More time needs to be spent with the tap and a comb.

I could go to the 'summer dome' route, similar to 'permanent domes' such as my big brother, in Arizona, Chuckles the Red Skull and John the Rage, but I choose not to. I certainly would look even more like Marvel's Kingpin at that point.
---

This is generally, not my preferred type of post for this website.

Facebook has in error blocked my second Blogger website, Satire Und Theology from posting entries on my Facebook business page, Russell Norman Murray, PhD. Facebook falsely claims I violated community standards with a recent entry where Kenneth Copeland is on a YouTube video stating...

Quote: The Devil's tryin' to give me the flu

Further, the Blogger entry and the associated Facebook entry contained the following comments from me:

Presumptive theology in regards to God, Satanic beings and humanity, and making money in the process.
---

Obviously, my entry was not supporting Kenneth Copeland's claim.

I have made four requests from Facebook for clarification regarding community standards. No reply.

Therefore I publish this entry on this website in order to post on my Facebook business page.

Saturday, April 11, 2020

The Orthodox Study Bible: Easter

Happy Easter!

The Orthodox Study Bible, New Testament and Psalms, (1993) Saint Athanasius Orthodox Academy, Thomas Nelson Publishers, Nashville, Tennessee.

From this Bible's Glossary and Reverend John W. Morris, Ph.D.

Easter

Cited

'The Feast of the Resurrection of Christ, also known as Pascha (from the Hebrew word for Passover). Christ proclaimed Himself as the true Passover and offered Himself as a sacrifice. Orthodox Christians celebrate Easter according to the decree of the Council of Nicea in A.D. 325: the first Sunday following the first full moon following the spring equinox following the Jewish Passover. Thus, Orthodox Easter is often one, four or five weeks after the western Easter.' (797).

W.R.F Browning explains that Easter became the early celebration of the Christian Church. (108). By the third century, 'it was preceded by a night vigil.' (108). At dawn, converts were baptized and all present in the Church received communion. (108). Browning writes that there was no 'Good Friday' celebration until the fourth century. (108).

Historian, Earle E. Cairns explains that the 'Easter Controversy' arose in the middle of the second century over the question of what the proper date to celebrate Easter was. (103). The Church in the East (Orthodoxy as discussed in this article, my add) held that Easter should be celebrated on the fourteenth day of Nisan, which is the date of Passover according to the Jewish calendar. (103).

Quote:

'The Eastern and Western segments of the church could not arrive at any agreement until the Council of Nicea in 325, when the viewpoint of the Western Church was adopted.' (103).

Opinion

Within my Reformed tradition, I am far less concerned with historical dates for Easter, from Church history and the history and traditions of churches; and more concerned with the historicity of the New Testament in regards to the atoning and resurrection of Jesus Christ, for his chosen persons (Ephesians 1, Romans 8-9), leading to the eventual resurrection of those who believe in him (1 Corinthians 15, Revelation 20-22).

Edited from

2010 Theodicy and Practical Theology: PhD thesis, the University of Wales, Trinity Saint David, Lampeter

Jesus Christ the person is held in extremely high regard as is his ministry, atoning work and resurrection, and his person and work cannot be separated in importance. Franke (2005: 72). The New Testament not only demonstrates the witness of the redeeming act of God in Christ but is also the summation of the man that is the word of God. Hughes (1990: 38). Erickson writes that Scripture teaches the resurrection of those who believe in Christ. Erickson (1994: 1194). He also reasons it is likely that unbelievers too will be raised, Erickson (1994: 1194), although this concept is not as clearly explained as is the idea of the raising of those who trust in Christ. Erickson (1994: 1200). 

(See Mounce and his Revelation commentary cited)

Sunday, October 11, 2009: The final battles of Revelation

Thiessen bases the traditional Christian belief in physical resurrection in the texts from both Testaments and describes the resurrection bodies as both physical and spiritual in nature. Thiessen (1956: 491). Whale writes that the resurrection is not to be considered an addition to the Christian faith, but is the Christian faith. Whale (1958: 69).

The resurrection can be denied outright by critics. Darrow (1928)(1973: 266-267). Phillips provides a negative atheistic critique of eschatological Christian concepts in his Chapter, ‘Last things.’ Phillips (2005: 247-275). Phillips reasons that there is not actual hope for persons after death in another realm. Phillips (2005: 248).

This would appear empirically true in one sense as resurrections typically are non-existent, but if the Biblical resurrection is true, there is hope for those in Christ. The resurrected Christ was empirically viewed within documented Scripture. However, if one does not believe in the resurrection of Christ, God’s key witness through historical documented Scripture to the world that he wishes to save it from the problem of evil is gone. The remedy to sin and death would be non-existent and therefore concepts of a perfected world far-fetched.

Edited from:

2003 The Problem of Evil: Anglican and Baptist Perspectives: MPhil thesis, Bangor University

Church Father Irenaeus stated concerning Christ’s work defeating death: For it behoved Him who was to destroy sin, and redeem man under the power of death, that He should Himself be made that very same thing which He was, that is, man; who had been drawn by sin into bondage, but was held by death so that sin should be destroyed by man, and man should go forth from death. Irenaeus. (ca. 130-200 AD) Book III, Chapter 18, Section 7. (Note: There does not seem to be a historical date to indicate when Irenaeus wrote this work. It is estimated that he wrote the work near the end of the second century.)

Easter Island: Pixabay
BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Oxford Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.

DARROW, CLARENCE (1928)(1973) ‘The Myth of the Soul’, in The Forum, October, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press.

DARROW, CLARENCE (1932)(1973) ‘The Delusion of Design and Purpose’, in The Story of My Life, October, in Paul Edwards and Arthur Pap (eds.), A Modern Introduction To Philosophy, New York, The Free Press.

ERICKSON, MILLARD (1994) Christian Theology, Grand Rapids, Baker Book House. 

ERICKSON, MILLARD (2003) What Does God Know and When Does He Know It?, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

FRANKE, JOHN R. (2005) The Character of Theology, Baker Academic, Grand Rapids. 

IRENAEUS. (c 175-185)(1998) ‘Against Heresies’, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, Denver, The Catholic Encyclopedia.

IRENAEUS. (c 175-185)(2005) Against Heresies, in The Catholic Encyclopedia, Denver, The Catholic Encyclopedia.

IRENAEUS (c 185)(2005) Proof of Apostolic Preaching, Translated by J. Armitage Robinson, London, The Macmillan CO.

PHILLIPS, D.Z. (1981) Encountering Evil, Stephen T. Davis (ed.), Atlanta, John Knox Press. 

MOUNCE, ROBERT H. (1990) The Book of Revelation, Grand Rapids, William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

PHILLIPS, D.Z. (2005) The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God, Fortress Press, Minneapolis. 

THIESSEN, HENRY C. (1956) Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology, Grand Rapids, Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company.

WHALE, J.S. (1958) Christian Doctrine, Glasgow, Fontana Books.

Wednesday, April 08, 2020

Baculum, Argumentum Ad II/Appeal to Force

Granville Street 1901
Facebook
Preface

This fallacy was previously discussed in 2016 from British Philosopher, Pirie.

Tuesday, January 05, 2016 Baculum, Argumentum Ad

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

'When reason fails you, appeal to the rod.' (46). Pirie lists Soviet leader, Joseph Stalin as a classic adherent. (47). This fallacious approach uses force as a means of persuasion as the argument would be lost without it. (46).

The threat of force does not have to be in the form of physical violence. (46). This fallacy occurs when 'unpleasant consequences are promised for failing to comply with the speaker's wishes'. (46). The author reasons that irrelevant material is brought into an argument. (46). The argument is largely abandoned and instead, forceful persuasion is used and depended on. There is a 'breakdown and subversion of reason'. (46). 

Baculum, Argumentum Ad II/Appeal to Force

Logically Fallacious

References: {apa} Jason, G. (1987). The nature of the argumentum ad baculum. Philosophia, 17(4), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381067 {/apa}

Cited

argumentum ad baculum (also known as: argument to the cudgel, appeal to the stick) 

Description: When force, coercion, or even a threat of force is used in place of a reason in an attempt to justify a conclusion. 

Logical Form: If you don’t accept X as true, I will hurt you. 

Cited

Jordan: Dad, why do I have to spend my summer at Jesus camp? 

Dad: Because if you don’t, you will spend your entire summer in your room with nothing but your Bible! 

Explanation: Instead of a reason, dad gave Jordan a description of a punishment that would happen. 

Exception: If the force, coercion, or threat of force is not being used as a reason but as a fact or consequence, then it would not be fallacious, especially when a legitimate reason is given with the “threat”, direct or implied.

This fallacy might be used by a person or entity when as Prie noted, reason fails.

The use of this fallacy could occur for several reasons but, non-exhaustively, it could be used as...

1. X provides a sound argument with a true premise (s) and a true conclusion, that is rejected by Y.

2. X provides a less than a sound argument, that is rejected by Y.

X then resorts to the use of fallacy under review.
---

A valid deductive argument can have 

False premises and a true conclusion (FT)

False premises and a false conclusion (FF)

True premises and a true conclusion (TT)

However

True premises and a false conclusion (TF) is invalid. Valid arguments with all true premises are called sound arguments. The conclusion also being true.

BLACKBURN, SIMON (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 

CONWAY DAVID A. AND RONALD MUNSON (1997) The Elements of Reasoning, Wadsworth Publishing Company, New York.

PIRIE, MADSEN (2006)(2015) How To Win Every Argument, Bloomsbury, London.

Google+
Hollywood Reporter

Cited

Stephen Colbert will be a guest on TBS' Conan on Tuesday night — and Conan O'Brien will also be a guest on CBS' The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. The two late-night hosts will appear on one another's shows, sharing a video chat they conducted earlier in the day.

Throughout my adult life, I have watched late-night talk shows occasionally. However, last night and early this morning, I came across this discussion on television, cited above, which took place on one show and then the other. On one network and then another, simultaneously for a time in the Metropolitan Vancouver market. From both homes.

Not only celebrities are recording programs from home, but so are many people involved in media in this COVID-19 pandemic. We also see this with some pastors preaching from home.

Philosophically, it is a sometimes strange new combination of the public and the private. With future pandemics as significantly possible, this could be a trend...