Friday, January 12, 2018

False prophecy and theological isolation

I saw one of these false prophecy signs  in this area in 2011.

False prophecy and theological isolation

Matthew 24: 34-41

New American Standard Bible

(NASB)

34"Truly I say to you, (AS) this generation will not pass away until all these things take place. 

35"(AT)Heaven and earth will pass away, but My words will not pass away.

36"But (AU) of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.

37"For the (AV) coming of the Son of Man will be (AW) just like the days of Noah.

38"For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, (AX) marrying and giving in marriage, until the day that (AY)Noah entered the ark,

39and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away; so will the (AZ) coming of the Son of Man be.

40"Then there will be two men in the field; one will be taken and one will be left.

41"(BA) Two women will be grinding at the (BB) mill; one will be taken and one will be left. Also in Matthew 24: 24, Jesus warned against false Christs and false prophets that would show great signs and wonders, and if possible even mislead the elect.

Camping: Michael Phillips May 22, 2011, Grace Baptist Church, Fremont, California

Proverbs 18:1

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

18 He who separates himself seeks his own desire, He [a]quarrels against all sound wisdom.

Mr. Phillips lectures that Harold Camping's (now the late Harold Camping) theological isolation was a central problem with his public doctrines.

At Columbia Bible College (1991-1995, my Bachelor of Arts) one of the key practical, theological tenets was that the bible and theology should be studied and developed in Christian community.

Mr. Phillips states that Camping was very good with chapter and verse knowledge of the bible. May I opine, that chapter and verse Scriptural knowledge without a reasonable, open-minded review of biblical context, with the use of biblical, theological and academic tools can lead to false, heretical and cultic doctrines and theology.

(Yes, there are scholarly persons with false theology and philosophy as well)

A reasonable interpretation is more important than chapter and verse knowledge.

May I further opine that a reasonable use of bible reading, commentaries and biblical, theological, and academic tools is more important than biblical memorization. Although, remembering Scripture is also vital.

I agree with Phillips (paraphrased), there is a difference for interpretation between:

1. Bible only

&

2. Bible as the final authority

The second and correct premise allows for bible interpretation and the use of biblical tools, theological tools, even philosophy of religion tools, and other academic tools.

The first premise allows for an interpretation of the bible, without any outside corrective.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Constantine & Church-State

Lake Como, Italy (Not my photo)

Constantine: Michael Phillips 1990, Grace Baptist Church, Fremont, California

Constantine (circa 274-288 A.D. to 337 A.D.)

Another fine lecture from Mr. Phillips. In the audio lecture he calls Constantine 'a Judas' and Mr. Phillips demonstrates the historical error on various levels, of a church-state union.

Loyalty to a church-state, religious, political union takes legal priority over following one's own conscience, including one that has a primary commitment to the New Testament, Kingdom of God (John 18, 18:36). The speaker is critical of both the Roman Catholic Church and Protestant movements, historically for supporting church-state unions.

As noted in previous entries:

In the era, church-state connections meant the politicization of the church in many contexts starting with favour for the church from Constantine (ca. 274-337) and eventually the development of the Roman Catholic Church in the West and the Greek Orthodox Church in the East, and the Schism of 1054. Cairns (1981: 205).

Politicization of the church may have protected it from persecution but there was the danger of State influence in church matters with a church-state union and this often effects the integrity of the Biblical and New Testament message and theology.

Cairns states between 313 and 590 the Old Catholic church became the Roman Catholic Church in which the bishop of Rome won primacy over other bishops. Cairns (1981: 157). At the same time church ritual also became more elaborate. Cairns (1981: 157).

I do not trust politicians and bureaucrats, or religious leaders, within a sinful, fallen realm, to accurately and reasonably administer theonomy (Biblical and/or religious law) within theocracy. (Religion-State rule). Jesus Christ stated his Kingdom was not of this world (John 18), and I support theocracy when ruled by the perfect and holy God.

CAIRNS, EARLE E. (1981) Christianity Through The Centuries, Grand Rapids, Zondervan Publishing House.

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Pauline Texts: Location II (Non-exhaustive)

Italy: People & Countries, Facebook

Pauline Texts: Location II (Non-exhaustive)

Previously

January 8

Continued

First Thessalonians 

Dates (Earliest Pauline works with Galatians)

1 Thessalonians,  Robert Gundry, 50-51 A.D. (page 364).

2 Thessalonians,  Robert Gundry, 50-51 A.D. (page 364).

Galatians, Robert Gundry, 49 A.D. (page 364).

F. Roy Coad, 48-49 A.D. (page 1416).

Paul wrote the letter from Corinth. Dunnett (42).

Second Thessalonians

Corinth. Dunnett (42).

Galatians

Corinth. Dunnett (55).

Prison Epistles

Ephesians
Philippians
Colossians
Philimon

Likely, Rome.

Biblica

Cited

'That Colossians is a genuine letter of Paul (1:1) is usually not disputed. In the early church, all who speak on the subject of authorship ascribe it to Paul. In the 19th century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted in ch. 2 was second-century Gnosticism. But a careful analysis of ch. 2 shows that the heresy referred to there is noticeably less developed than the Gnosticism of leading Gnostic teachers of the second and third centuries. Also, the seeds of what later became the full-blown Gnosticism of the second century were present in the first century and already making inroads into the churches.

Consequently, it is not necessary to date Colossians in the second century at a time too late for Paul to have written the letter. Instead, it is to be dated during Paul’s first imprisonment in Rome, where he spent at least two years under house arrest (see Ac 28:16–31). Some have argued that Paul wrote Colossians from Ephesus or Caesarea, but most of the evidence favors Rome as the place where Paul penned all the Prison Letters (Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians and Philemon). Colossians should be dated c. a.d. 60, in the same year as Ephesians and Philemon (see chart, p. 2261).'
---

Pastoral Epistles

First Timothy
Second Timothy
Titus

Debated locations.

Bible Hub.com: Pastoral Epistles

Cited

Schaff

pp.327-329.

Cited

'The Pauline Authorship.

'There never was a serious doubt as to the Pauline authorship of these Epistles till the nineteenth century, except among a few Gnostics in the second century.'

Cited

'But there are certain internal difficulties which have induced a number of modern critics to assign them all, or at least First Timothy, to a post-Pauline or pseudo-Pauline writer, who either changed and adapted Pauline originals to a later state of the church, or fabricated the whole in the interest of Catholic orthodoxy. In either case, the writer is credited with the best intentions and must not be judged according to the modern standard of literary honesty and literary property.'

Browning opines that the balance of evidence is that the Pastoral Epistles are pseudonymous. (184). As in supposed to be written under a false name.

Cited

Schaff:

'The objections against the Pauline authorship deserve serious consideration, and are as follows: (1) The impossibility of locating these Epistles in the recorded life of Paul; (2) the Gnostic heresy opposed; (3) the ecclesiastical organization implied; (4) the peculiarities of style and temper. If they are not genuine, Second Timothy must be the oldest, as it is least liable to these objections, and First Timothy and Titus are supposed to represent a later development. [1196]'

Cited

'The Pastoral Epistles, like Colossians, oppose the Gnostic heresy (gnosis pseudonumos,1 Tim.6:20) which arose in Asia Minor during his first Roman captivity, and appears more fully developed in Cerinthus, the contemporary of John. This was acknowledged by the early Fathers, Irenaeus and Tertullian, who used these very Epistles as Pauline testimonies against the Gnosticism of their day.'

Cited

'In conclusion, while we cannot be blind to certain difficulties, and may not be able, from want of knowledge of the precise situation of the writer, satisfactorily to explain them, we must insist that the prevailing evidence is in favor of the genuineness of these Epistles....'

Gnosticism may have very well been discussed in Colossians:

Colossians 2:16-19

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

16 Therefore no one is to [a]act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a Sabbath [b]day— 17 things which are a mere shadow of what is to come; but the [c]substance [d]belongs to Christ. 18 Let no one keep [e]defrauding you of your prize by delighting in [f]self-abasement and the worship of the angels, [g]taking his stand on visions he has seen, [h]inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, 19 and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and [i]ligaments, grows with a growth [j]which is from God.

Oxford Biblical Studies Online

Browning

Cited

'Although Gnosticism was most fully manifest in the 2nd cent. CE, traces of it are already evident earlier, and some detect it as the false teaching which the epistle to the Colossians seems to reflect. '

'Along with visionary experiences Gnostics promoted an extreme asceticism and distrust of the material world, so that some scholars regard the epistle’s discouragement of self-abasement and the worship of angels (Col. 2: 18) and the concept of pleroma (Col. 1: 19) as references to Gnosticism. '

Some within scholarship suggest that the views of Judaizers may have been the Colossian heresy.

Possibly a combination of early Gnosticism and forms of Judaism?
---

I have noted previously on my websites that the Apostle Paul may have used a scribe (s) to write some of his later works. This would maintain the texts as obviously humanly different, but also Pauline and reasonably, inspired Scripture.

BIBLICA (2018) Colossians, Colorado Springs.
Biblica. https://www.biblica.com/resources/scholar-notes/niv-study-bible/intro-to-colossians/

BROWNING, W.R.F. (1997) Dictionary of the Bible, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

COAD, F. ROY (1986) 'Galatians' in F.F. Bruce (ed.), The International Bible Commentary, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

DUNNETT, WALTER M. (2001) Exploring the New Testament, Wheaton, Crossway Books. 

GUNDRY, ROBERT (1981) A Survey of the New Testament, Grand Rapids, Zondervan.

SCHAFF,  PHILLIP (1882((2018) History of the Christian Church, Volume I,union Theological Seminary, New York. http://biblehub.com/library/schaff/history_of_the_christian_church_volume_i/section_99_the_pastoral_epistles.htm

Tuesday, January 09, 2018

Versus Hyper-Calvinism

North American wilderness (Not my photo)


Versus Hyper-Calvinism

Hyper-Calvinism: Michael Phillips, September 2005: Grace Baptist Church, Fremont, California

Early this morning, I discovered Mr. Phillips' lectures, which I find helpful. I consider myself Reformed and I agree with TULIP, but of course with my own educational background my interpretation is heavily influenced by bible, theology and philosophy of religion. My philosophical takes could lead to some misunderstandings with readers from time to time, I suppose.

I am not a Hyper-Calvinist and never have been. I would have significant disagreement with all the premises noted. I will comment on certain ones. The rest are covered by overall objections.

Further on Hyper-Calvinism from Monergism: Monergism.com

Cited

Most Calvinists reject as deplorable the following hyper-Calvinistic and destructive beliefs: 

- that God is the author of sin and of evil

This is admittedly tricky. I reason theologically and philosophically, God is the first/primary cause of all things, but submitting to Scripture in context, as James states:

James 1:13-15

New American Standard Bible (NASB)

13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted [a]by God”; for God cannot be tempted [b]by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin [c]is accomplished, it brings forth death.

In the context of sin and evil, God as first/primary cause accurately needs to be understood as permitting sin and evil.

This is opposed to God forcing or coercing sin and evil (no human moral responsibility), or even demanding sin and evil (with human responsibility). Fallen human beings as a secondary cause embrace sin and evil. Demonic beings as secondary cause embrace human sin and evil, and indeed their own evil opposed to God.
 
- that men have no will of their own, and secondary causes are of no effect 

Again on this website, in comparison:

Compatibilism/Soft determinism

God is first/primary cause
Humanity is secondary cause

Determinism/Hard determinism

God is first/primary cause
---

I realize that soft determinism is under determinism in a sense, but in my MPhil/PhD and blogging, I have found that at times determinism and hard determinism are synonymously used terms.

- that the number of the elect at any time may be known by men 

- that it is wrong to evangelize 

The Holy Spirit can use calls for evangelism in a regeneration process. Preaching and biblical calls for repentance, for example.

- that assurance of election must be sought prior to repentance and faith

- that men who have once sincerely professed belief are saved regardless of what they later do 

- that God has chosen some races of men and has rejected others 

- that the children of unbelievers dying in infancy are certainly damned 

Within Hyper-Calvinism, this view, which I disagree with, paedobaptism in some cases may be viewed as a requirement for covenant membership and therefore salvation.

- that God does not command everyone to repent - that the sacraments are not means of grace, but obstacles to salvation by faith alone. 

- that the true church is only invisible, and salvation is not connected with the visible church

- that the Scriptures are intended to be interpreted by individuals only and not by the church.

- that no government is to be obeyed which does not acknowledge that Jesus is the Lord, or that Biblical Law is its source of authority

- that the grace of God does not work for the betterment of all men - that saving faith is equivalent to belief in the doctrine of predestination 

- that only Calvinists are Christians (Neo-gnostic Calvinism

Arminianism and Hyper-Calvinism were both among the historical errors battled by Charles Spurgeon, who was himself a 5-point Calvinist. He vigilantly fought these twin errors on both sides of the spectrum. One of Hyper-Calvinism's main errors is to declare that, because of God's sovereignty, we should not evangelize the lost. Spurgeon rejected such nonsense as do the large majority of people who would call themselves Calvinists today (such as R.C. Sproul, John Piper, John MacArthur, Alistair Begg and many others) We believe the doctrine of election should be declared strongly because the Bible does and because man's affections are enslaved to sin. He cannot save himself but needs the effectual working of the Holy Spirit if he is to have ears to hear when we preach the gospel. The preacher casts forth the seed of the gospel (the command to believe) indiscriminately but the Holy Spirit germinates the Word (so to speak) in the hearts of those he intends to save; i.e. those given to the Son by the Father in the eternal covenant made before time (John 6:37, 39, Eph 1, 4). Many Christian missionaries whom most would consider heroes held to the five point of Calvinism: William Carrey (he was opposed by a Hyper-Calvinist), Jonathan Edwards & David Brainard (missionaries to native Americans) just to name 3.

Quote: He cannot save himself but needs the effectual working of the Holy Spirit if he is to have ears to hear when we preach the gospel.  Agreed.

I have found that some within Hyper-Calvinism basically view God's chose of persons in election as arbitrary.

I certainly agree that person's do not save selves or have any work that contribute to salvation. Ephesians 1-2 documents election and salvation by grace through faith, not by works, but for good works, Romans 3 writes that none righteous, no one seeks God, no one does good. Romans 9 explains that God chooses based on his will. not human works or goodness, as good examples.

God through Jesus Christ, does have an everlasting purpose for the elect that he does not have for the non-elect. A human work (or any human ontological quality) does not save anyone, but God works
through the elect with an eternal (God) and everlasting (human) purpose.